Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johan Dovland
dblp:22/5956
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › type systems › subtyping
behavioral subtyping |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Lazy Behavioral Subtyping · FM 2008 |
Programming languages and type systems › specification language
specification inheritance |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Lazy Behavioral Subtyping · FM 2008 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Verifying traits: an incremental proof system for fine-grained reuseabstractAbstract Traits have been proposed as a more flexible mechanism than class inheritance for structuring code in object-oriented programming, to achieve fine-grained code reuse. A trait originally developed for one purpose can be adapted and reused in a completely different context. Formalizations of traits have been extensively studied, and implementations of traits have started to appear in programming languages. So far, work on formally establishing properties of trait-based programs has mostly concentrated on type systems. This paper presents the first deductive proof system for a trait-based object-oriented language. If a specification of a trait can be given a priori, covering all actual usage of that trait, our proof system is modular as each trait is analyzed only once. However, imposing such a restriction may in many cases unnecessarily limit traits as a mechanism for flexible code reuse. In order to reflect the flexible reuse potential of traits, our proof system additionally allows new specifications to be added to a trait in anincrementalway which does not violate established proofs. We formalize and show the soundness of the proof system. Ferruccio Damiani, Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Ina Schaefer |
Formal Aspects Comput. | 2 |
| 2012 | Tracking Behavioral Constraints during Object-Oriented Software Evolution
Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Ingrid Chieh Yu |
ISoLA (1) | 1 |
| 2012 | Compositional Reasoning about Shared Futures
Crystal Chang Din, Johan Dovland, Olaf Owe |
SEFM | 2 |
| 2012 | A transformational proof system for delta-oriented programmingabstractDelta-oriented programming is a modular, yet flexible technique to implement software product lines. To efficiently verify the specifications of all possible product variants of a product line, it is usually infeasible to generate all product variants and to verify them individually. To counter this problem, we propose a transformational proof system in which the specifications in a delta module describe changes to previous specifications. Our approach allows each delta module to be verified in isolation, based on symbolic assumptions for calls to methods which may be in other delta modules. When product variants are generated from delta modules, these assumptions are instantiated by the actual guarantees of the methods in the considered product variant and used to derive the specifications of this product variant. Ferruccio Damiani, Olaf Owe, Johan Dovland, Ina Schaefer, Einar Broch Johnsen, Ingrid Chieh Yu |
SPLC (2) | 3 |
| 2011 | Verifying traits: a proof system for fine-grained reuseabstractTraits have been proposed as a more flexible mechanism for code structuring in object-oriented programming than class inheritance, for achieving fine-grained code reuse. A trait originally developed for one purpose can be modified and reused in a completely different context. Formalizations of traits have been extensively studied, and implementations of traits have started to appear in programming languages. However, work on formally establishing properties of trait-based programs has so far mostly concentrated on type systems. This paper proposes the first deductive proof system for a trait-based object-oriented language. If a specification for a trait can be given a priori, covering all actual usage of that trait, our proof system is modular as each trait is analyzed only once. In order to reflect the flexible reuse potential of traits, our proof system additionally allows new specifications to be added to a trait in an incremental way which does not violate established proofs. We formalize and show the soundness of the proof system. Ferruccio Damiani, Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Ina Schaefer |
FTfJP@ECOOP | 2 |
| 2011 | Incremental reasoning with lazy behavioral subtyping for multiple inheritance
Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Martin Steffen |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 1 |
| 2009 | Incremental Reasoning for Multiple Inheritance
Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Martin Steffen |
IFM | 1 |
| 2008 | Lazy Behavioral Subtyping
Johan Dovland, Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Martin Steffen |
FM | 1 |