Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mehran Bozorgi

dblp:22/8315 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
exploit prediction
0.112010
Beyond heuristics: learning to classify vulnerabilities and predict exploits · KDD 2010
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
vulnerability classification
0.112010
Beyond heuristics: learning to classify vulnerabilities and predict exploits · KDD 2010
Systems and software security
vulnerability management
0.112010
Beyond heuristics: learning to classify vulnerabilities and predict exploits · KDD 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text mining · 0.1feature extraction · 0.1classifier training · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Beyond heuristics: learning to classify vulnerabilities and predict exploits
abstract
The security demands on modern system administration are enormous and getting worse. Chief among these demands, administrators must monitor the continual ongoing disclosure of software vulnerabilities that have the potential to compromise their systems in some way. Such vulnerabilities include buffer overflow errors, improperly validated inputs, and other unanticipated attack modalities. In 2008, over 7,400 new vulnerabilities were disclosed--well over 100 per week. While no enterprise is affected by all of these disclosures, administrators commonly face many outstanding vulnerabilities across the software systems they manage. Vulnerabilities can be addressed by patches, reconfigurations, and other workarounds; however, these actions may incur down-time or unforeseen side-effects. Thus, a key question for systems administrators is which vulnerabilities to prioritize. From publicly available databases that document past vulnerabilities, we show how to train classifiers that predict whether and how soon a vulnerability is likely to be exploited. As input, our classifiers operate on high dimensional feature vectors that we extract from the text fields, time stamps, cross references, and other entries in existing vulnerability disclosure reports. Compared to current industry-standard heuristics based on expert knowledge and static formulas, our classifiers predict much more accurately whether and how soon individual vulnerabilities are likely to be exploited.
Mehran Bozorgi, Lawrence K. Saul, Stefan Savage, Geoffrey M. Voelker
KDD1