Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Miguel Martinez-Alvarez

dblp:22/8482 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 10 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 66% Data mining · 34%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.322013
Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013
Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.322013
Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013
Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.212013
Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary · SIGIR 2013
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis
0.112012
Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
sentiment classification
0.112012
Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews · SIGIR 2012
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.112011
Descriptive modelling of text classification and its integration with other IR tasks · SIGIR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sentence removal · 0.2divergence · 0.2cosine similarity · 0.2subjectivity detection · 0.1sentence extraction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Recognising Summary Articles
M-Dyaa Albakour, Udo Kruschwitz, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez
ECIR (1)4
2018 A Data Collection for Evaluating the Retrieval of Related Tweets to News Articles
Axel Suarez, M-Dyaa Albakour, David P. A. Corney, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, José Esquivel
ECIR4
2017 On the Long-Tail Entities in News
José Esquivel, M-Dyaa Albakour, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, David P. A. Corney, Samir Moussa
ECIR3
2016 First International Workshop on Recent Trends in News Information Retrieval (NewsIR'16)
Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Udo Kruschwitz, Gabriella Kazai, Frank Hopfgartner, David P. A. Corney, Ricardo Campos 0001, M-Dyaa Albakour
ECIR1
2015 Signal: Advanced Real-Time Information Filtering
Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Udo Kruschwitz, Wesley Hall, Massimo Poesio
ECIR1
2013 Document Difficulty Framework for Semi-automatic Text Classification
Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Alejandro Bellogín, Thomas Roelleke
DaWaK1
2013 Extractive summarisation via sentence removal: condensing relevant sentences into a short summary
abstract
Many on-line services allow users to describe their opinions about a product or a service through a review. In order to help other users to find out the major opinion about a given topic, without the effort to read several reviews, multi-document summarisation is required. This research proposes an approach for extractive summarisation, supporting different scoring techniques, such as cosine similarity or divergence, as a method for finding representative sentences. The main contribution of this paper is the definition of an algorithm for sentence removal, developed to maximise the score between the summary and the original document. Instead of ranking the sentences and selecting the most important ones, the algorithm iteratively removes unimportant sentences until a desired compression rate is reached. Experimental results show that variations of the sentence removal algorithm provide good performance.
Marco Bonzanini, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Thomas Roelleke
SIGIR2
2012 Semi-automatic Document Classification: Exploiting Document Difficulty
Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Sirvan Yahyaei, Thomas Roelleke
ECIR1
2012 Opinion summarisation through sentence extraction: an investigation with movie reviews
abstract
In on-line reviews, authors often use a short passage to describe the overall feeling about a product or a service. A review as a whole can mention many details not in line with the overall feeling, so capturing this key passage is important to understand the overall sentiment of the review. This paper investigates the use of extractive summarisation in the context of sentiment classification. The aim is to find the summary sentence, or the short passage, which gives the overall sentiment of the review, filtering out potential noisy information. Experiments on a movie review data-set show that subjectivity detection plays a central role in building summaries for sentiment classification. Subjective extracts carry the same polarity of the full text reviews, while statistical and positional approaches are not able to capture this aspect.
Marco Bonzanini, Miguel Martinez-Alvarez, Thomas Roelleke
SIGIR2
2011 Descriptive modelling of text classification and its integration with other IR tasks
abstract
Nowadays, Information Retrieval (IR) systems have to deal with multiple sources of data available in different formats. Datasets can consist of complex and heterogeneous objects with relationships between them. In addition, information needs can vary wildly and they can include different tasks. As a result, the importance of flexibility in IR systems is rapidly growing. This fact is specially important in environments where the information required at different moments is very different and its utility may be contingent on timely implementation. In these cases, how quickly a new problem is solved is as important as how well you solve it.
Miguel Martinez-Alvarez
SIGIR1