EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oliver T. Fackler
dblp:220/1580
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2982-4209ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
bioimage analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | VisuStatR: visualizing motility and morphology statistics on images in R · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
live cell imaging analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | VisuStatR: visualizing motility and morphology statistics on images in R · Bioinform. 2022 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
object tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Recurrent Neural Network for Particle Tracking in Microscopy Images Using Future Information, Track Hypotheses, and Multiple Detections · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object tracking
particle tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Recurrent Neural Network for Particle Tracking in Microscopy Images Using Future Information, Track Hypotheses, and Multiple Detections · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Recurrent Neural Network for Particle Tracking in Microscopy Images Using Future Information, Track Hypotheses, and Multiple Detections · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
track hypotheses · 0.9recurrent neural network · 0.9multiple detection assignment · 0.9statistical visualization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | VisuStatR: visualizing motility and morphology statistics on images in RabstractMOTIVATION: Live-cell microscopy has become an essential tool for analyzing dynamic processes in various biological applications. Thereby, high-throughput and automated tracking analyses allow the simultaneous evaluation of large numbers of objects. However, to critically assess the influence of individual objects on calculated summary statistics, and to detect heterogeneous dynamics or possible artifacts, such as misclassified or -tracked objects, a direct mapping of gained statistical information onto the actual image data would be necessary. RESULTS: We present VisuStatR as a platform independent software package that allows the direct visualization of time-resolved summary statistics of morphological characteristics or motility dynamics onto raw images. The software contains several display modes to compare user-defined summary statistics and the underlying image data in various levels of detail. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: VisuStatR is a free and open-source R-package, containing a user-friendly graphical-user interface and is available via GitHub at https://github.com/grrchrr/VisuStatR/ under the MIT+ license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Christoph Harmel, Samy Sid Ahmed, Robin Koch, Jana Tünnermann, Tania Distler, Andrea Imle, Luca Giorgetti, Emanuel Bahn, Oliver T. Fackler, Frederik Graw |
Bioinform. | 9 |
| 2021 | Data fusion and smoothing for probabilistic tracking of viral structures in fluorescence microscopy images
Christian Ritter, Thomas Wollmann, Andrea Imle, Barbara Müller, Oliver T. Fackler, Ralf Bartenschlager, Karl Rohr |
Medical Image Anal. | 6 |
| 2020 | A Recurrent Neural Network for Particle Tracking in Microscopy Images Using Future Information, Track Hypotheses, and Multiple DetectionsabstractAutomatic tracking of particles in time-lapse fluorescence microscopy images is essential for quantifying the dynamic behavior of subcellular structures and virus structures. We introduce a novel particle tracking approach based on a deep recurrent neural network architecture that exploits past and future information in both forward and backward direction. Assignment probabilities are determined jointly across multiple detections, and the probability of missing detections is computed. In addition, existence probabilities are determined by the network to handle track initiation and termination. For correspondence finding, track hypotheses are propagated to future time points so that information at later time points can be used to resolve ambiguities. A handcrafted similarity measure and handcrafted motion features are not necessary. Manually labeled data is not required for network training. We evaluated the performance of our approach using image data of the Particle Tracking Challenge as well as real fluorescence microscopy image sequences of virus structures. It turned out that the proposed approach outperforms previous methods. Roman Spilger, Andrea Imle, Barbara Müller, Oliver T. Fackler, Ralf Bartenschlager, Karl Rohr |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 5 |
| 2019 | FAMoS: A Flexible and dynamic Algorithm for Model Selection to analyse complex systems dynamicsabstractMost biological systems are difficult to analyse due to a multitude of interacting components and the concomitant lack of information about the essential dynamics. Finding appropriate models that provide a systematic description of such biological systems and that help to identify their relevant factors and processes can be challenging given the sheer number of possibilities. Model selection algorithms that evaluate the performance of a multitude of different models against experimental data provide a useful tool to identify appropriate model structures. However, many algorithms addressing the analysis of complex dynamical systems, as they are often used in biology, compare a preselected number of models or rely on exhaustive searches of the total model space which might be unfeasible dependent on the number of possibilities. Therefore, we developed an algorithm that is able to perform model selection on complex systems and searches large model spaces in a dynamical way. Our algorithm includes local and newly developed non-local search methods that can prevent the algorithm from ending up in local minima of the model space by accounting for structurally similar processes. We tested and validated the algorithm based on simulated data and showed its flexibility for handling different model structures. We also used the algorithm to analyse experimental data on the cell proliferation dynamics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that were cultured under different conditions. Our analyses indicated dynamical changes within the proliferation potential of cells that was reduced within tissue-like 3D ex vivo cultures compared to suspension. Due to the flexibility in handling various model structures, the algorithm is applicable to a large variety of different biological problems and represents a useful tool for the data-oriented evaluation of complex model spaces. Michael Gabel, Tobias Hohl, Andrea Imle, Oliver T. Fackler, Frederik Graw |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |