Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Aday
dblp:220/2498
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018 |
Software testing › fuzzing › system software fuzzing
kernel fuzzing |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trace distillation · 0.7coverage-guided fuzzing · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Efficient Repair of Polluted Machine Learning Systems via Causal UnlearningabstractMachine learning systems, though being successful in many real-world applications, are known to remain prone to errors and attacks. A major attack, called data pollution, injects maliciously crafted training data samples into the training set, causing the system to learn an incorrect model and subsequently misclassify testing samples. A natural solution to a data pollution attack is to remove the polluted data from the training set and relearn a clean model. Unfortunately, the training set of a real-world machine learning system can contain millions of samples; it is thus hopeless for an administrator to manually inspect all of them to weed out the polluted ones. Yinzhi Cao, Alexander Fangxiao Yu, Andrew Aday, Eric Stahl, Jon Merwine |
AsiaCCS | 3 |
| 2018 | MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation
Shankara Pailoor, Andrew Aday, Suman Jana |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |