Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Aday

dblp:220/2498 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
0.312018
MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.312018
MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018
Software testing › fuzzing › system software fuzzing
kernel fuzzing
0.112018
MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation · USENIX Security Symposium 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace distillation · 0.7coverage-guided fuzzing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Efficient Repair of Polluted Machine Learning Systems via Causal Unlearning
abstract
Machine learning systems, though being successful in many real-world applications, are known to remain prone to errors and attacks. A major attack, called data pollution, injects maliciously crafted training data samples into the training set, causing the system to learn an incorrect model and subsequently misclassify testing samples. A natural solution to a data pollution attack is to remove the polluted data from the training set and relearn a clean model. Unfortunately, the training set of a real-world machine learning system can contain millions of samples; it is thus hopeless for an administrator to manually inspect all of them to weed out the polluted ones.
Yinzhi Cao, Alexander Fangxiao Yu, Andrew Aday, Eric Stahl, Jon Merwine
AsiaCCS3
2018 MoonShine: Optimizing OS Fuzzer Seed Selection with Trace Distillation
Shankara Pailoor, Andrew Aday, Suman Jana
USENIX Security Symposium2