Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muhammad Moiz Arif

dblp:220/2880 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
performance testing
0.312018
Empirical study on the discrepancy between performance testing results from virtual and physical environments · ICSE 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.112018
Empirical study on the discrepancy between performance testing results from virtual and physical environments · ICSE 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization
virtual machine
0.112018
Empirical study on the discrepancy between performance testing results from virtual and physical environments · ICSE 2018
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Empirical study on the discrepancy between performance testing results from virtual and physical environments
abstract
Large software systems often undergo performance tests to ensure their capability to handle expected loads. These performance tests often consume large amounts of computing resources and time since heavy loads need to be generated. Making it worse, the ever evolving field requires frequent updates to the performance testing environment. In practice, virtual machines (VMs) are widely exploited to provide flexible and less costly environments for performance tests. However, the use of VMs may introduce confounding overhead (e.g., a higher than expected memory utilization with unstable I/O traffic) to the testing environment and lead to unrealistic performance testing results. Yet, little research has studied the impact on test results of using VMs in performance testing activities.
Muhammad Moiz Arif, Weiyi Shang, Emad Shihab
ICSE1
2018 Empirical study on the discrepancy between performance testing results from virtual and physical environments
Muhammad Moiz Arif, Weiyi Shang, Emad Shihab
Empir. Softw. Eng.1