Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Rajiv Sambharya

dblp:220/3395 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 57% Optimization for machine learning · 43%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer
1.622025
Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.122025
Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
1.122025
Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Mathematical optimization › optimization
warm-start optimization
0.812024
Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.312025
Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical learning theory · 1.7sample convergence bound · 1.7neural network · 1.5fixed-point iteration · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers
abstract
We introduce a data-driven approach to analyze the performance of continuous optimization algorithms using generalization guarantees from statistical learning theory. We study classical and learned optimizers to solve families of parametric optimization problems. We build generalization guarantees for classical optimizers, using a sample convergence bound, and for learned optimizers, using the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC)-Bayes framework. To train learned optimizers, we use a gradient-based algorithm to directly minimize the PAC-Bayes upper bound. Numerical experiments in signal processing, control, and meta-learning showcase the ability of our framework to provide strong generalization guarantees for both classical and learned optimizers given a fixed budget of iterations. For classical optimizers, our bounds which hold with high probability are much tighter than those that worst-case guarantees provide. For learned optimizers, our bounds outperform the empirical outcomes observed in their non-learned counterparts.
Rajiv Sambharya, Bartolomeo Stellato
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2024 Learning to Warm-Start Fixed-Point Optimization Algorithms
abstract
We introduce a machine-learning framework to warm-start fixed-point optimization algorithms. Our architecture consists of a neural network mapping problem parameters to warm starts, followed by a predefined number of fixed-point iterations. We propose two loss functions designed to either minimize the fixed-point residual or the distance to a ground truth solution. In this way, the neural network predicts warm starts with the end-to-end goal of minimizing the downstream loss. An important feature of our architecture is its flexibility, in that it can predict a warm start for fixed-point algorithms run for any number of steps, without being limited to the number of steps it has been trained on. We provide PAC-Bayes generalization bounds on unseen data for common classes of fixed-point operators: contractive, linearly convergent, and averaged. Applying this framework to well-known applications in control, statistics, and signal processing, we observe a significant reduction in the number of iterations and solution time required to solve these problems, through learned warm starts.
Rajiv Sambharya, Georgina Hall, Brandon Amos, Bartolomeo Stellato
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1