Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Segwang Kim
dblp:220/3735
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2678-9858ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 38% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Weakly Supervised Semantic Parsing with Execution-based Spurious Program Filtering · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
weakly supervised semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Weakly Supervised Semantic Parsing with Execution-based Spurious Program Filtering · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Sequence-to-grid Module for Learning Symbolic Rules · AAAI 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
symbolic rule learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Sequence-to-grid Module for Learning Symbolic Rules · AAAI 2021 |
Automata and formal languages › descriptional complexity
automata complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Number Sequence Prediction Problems for Evaluating Computational Powers of Neural Networks · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Weakly Supervised Semantic Parsing with Execution-based Spurious Program Filtering · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › expressive power
computational power of neural networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Number Sequence Prediction Problems for Evaluating Computational Powers of Neural Networks · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural turing machine · 0.8LSTM · 0.8GRU · 0.8CNN · 0.8representation learning · 0.7program execution · 0.7majority vote · 0.7seq2grid · 0.5resnet · 0.5TextCNN · 0.5Stack-RNN · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Weakly Supervised Semantic Parsing with Execution-based Spurious Program FilteringabstractThe problem of spurious programs is a longstanding challenge when training a semantic parser from weak supervision.To eliminate such programs that have wrong semantics but correct denotation, existing methods focus on exploiting similarities between examples based on domain-specific knowledge.In this paper, we propose a domain-agnostic filtering mechanism based on program execution results.Specifically, for each program obtained through the search process, we first construct a representation that captures the program's semantics as execution results under various inputs.Then, we run a majority vote on these representations to identify and filter out programs with significantly different semantics from the other programs.In particular, our method is orthogonal to the program search process so that it can easily augment any of the existing weakly supervised semantic parsing frameworks.Empirical evaluations on the Natural Language Visual Reasoning and WIKITABLEQUESTIONS demonstrate that applying our method to the existing semantic parsers induces significantly improved performances.Code is available at https://github.com/klee972/exec-filter. Kangil Lee 0001, Segwang Kim, Kyomin Jung |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2021 | Neural Sequence-to-grid Module for Learning Symbolic RulesabstractLogical reasoning tasks over symbols, such as learning arithmetic operations and computer program evaluations, have become challenges to deep learning. In particular, even state-of-the-art neural networks fail to achieve \textit{out-of-distribution} (OOD) generalization of symbolic reasoning tasks, whereas humans can easily extend learned symbolic rules. To resolve this difficulty, we propose a neural sequence-to-grid (seq2grid) module, an input preprocessor that automatically segments and aligns an input sequence into a grid. As our module outputs a grid via a novel differentiable mapping, any neural network structure taking a grid input, such as ResNet or TextCNN, can be jointly trained with our module in an end-to-end fashion. Extensive experiments show that neural networks having our module as an input preprocessor achieve OOD generalization on various arithmetic and algorithmic problems including number sequence prediction problems, algebraic word problems, and computer program evaluation problems while other state-of-the-art sequence transduction models cannot. Moreover, we verify that our module enhances TextCNN to solve the bAbI QA tasks without external memory. Segwang Kim, Hyoungwook Nam, Joonyoung Kim 0003, Kyomin Jung |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Number Sequence Prediction Problems for Evaluating Computational Powers of Neural NetworksabstractInspired by number series tests to measure human intelligence, we suggest number sequence prediction tasks to assess neural network models’ computational powers for solving algorithmic problems. We define the complexity and difficulty of a number sequence prediction task with the structure of the smallest automaton that can generate the sequence. We suggest two types of number sequence prediction problems: the number-level and the digit-level problems. The number-level problems format sequences as 2-dimensional grids of digits and the digit-level problems provide a single digit input per a time step. The complexity of a number-level sequence prediction can be defined with the depth of an equivalent combinatorial logic, and the complexity of a digit-level sequence prediction can be defined with an equivalent state automaton for the generation rule. Experiments with number-level sequences suggest that CNN models are capable of learning the compound operations of sequence generation rules, but the depths of the compound operations are limited. For the digitlevel problems, simple GRU and LSTM models can solve some problems with the complexity of finite state automata. Memory augmented models such as Stack-RNN, Attention, and Neural Turing Machines can solve the reverse-order task which has the complexity of simple pushdown automaton. However, all of above cannot solve general Fibonacci, Arithmetic or Geometric sequence generation problems that represent the complexity of queue automata or Turing machines. The results show that our number sequence prediction problems effectively evaluate machine learning models’ computational capabilities. Hyoungwook Nam, Segwang Kim, Kyomin Jung |
AAAI | 2 |