Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oliver Scheel

dblp:220/4022 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3084-6675ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Autonomous driving · 51% Motion planning and robot control · 19% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 11%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
prediction and planning
0.722019
Attention-based Lane Change Prediction · ICRA 2019
Situation Assessment for Planning Lane Changes: Combining Recurrent Models and Prediction · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Autonomous driving › autonomous vehicle testing
closed-loop evaluation
0.512021
SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
driving simulation
0.512021
SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.512021
What data do we need for training an AV motion planner? · ICRA 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning evaluation
0.512021
SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations · ICRA 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data requirements
0.512021
What data do we need for training an AV motion planner? · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Autonomous driving › maneuver anticipation
lane change prediction
0.412019
Attention-based Lane Change Prediction · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.312018
Situation Assessment for Planning Lane Changes: Combining Recurrent Models and Prediction · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.112021
What data do we need for training an AV motion planner? · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.5markov process · 0.5imitation learning · 0.5deep neural network · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.4sampling-based planning · 0.3long short-term memory · 0.3local optimization · 0.3intelligent driver model · 0.3bidirectional recurrent neural network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Recurrent Models for Lane Change Prediction and Situation Assessment
abstract
Predicting future events accurately is a task of great importance for autonomous vehicles. In this work we focus on lane change events. For this, we propose a novel attention mechanism on top of recurrent neural networks for the prediction task, which improves performance and yields more interpretable models. As critical corner cases are often not considered and reflected in traditional prediction metrics, we additionally introduce a new scenario-based evaluation scheme, which we posit be considered for further maneuver prediction works. Prediction and planning tasks often are correlated, usually sharing input representations and differing in expected outputs and their subsequent consideration. Here, we detail a supporting layer for planning tasks, which analyzes situations w.r.t. their suitability for lane changes and can serve as decision-making support for any planning algorithm. Exploitation of similarities between this task and the aforementioned prediction problem further improves performance of the prediction task, as well as labelling quality of the assessment task. Additionally, we extend our evaluation to urban scenarios, showcasing the generalizability of our proposed prediction models.
Oliver Scheel, Naveen Shankar Nagaraja, Loren Arthur Schwarz, Nassir Navab, Federico Tombari
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.1
2021 SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations
abstract
In this work we present a simple end-to-end trainable machine learning system capable of realistically simulating driving experiences. This can be used for verification of self-driving system performance without relying on expensive and time-consuming road testing. In particular, we frame the simulation problem as a Markov Process, leveraging deep neural networks to model both state distribution and transition function. These are trainable directly from the existing raw observations without the need of any handcrafting in the form of plant or kinematic models. All that is needed is a dataset of historical traffic episodes. Our formulation allows the system to construct never seen scenes that unfold realistically reacting to the self-driving car’s behaviour. We train our system directly from 1,000 hours of driving logs and measure both realism, reactivity of the simulation as the two key properties of the simulation. At the same time we apply the method to evaluate performance of a recently proposed state-of-the-art ML planning system [1] trained from human driving logs. We discover this planning system is prone to previously unreported causal confusion issues that are difficult to test by non-reactive simulation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that directly merges highly realistic data-driven simulations with a closed loop evaluation for self-driving vehicles. We make the data, code, and pre-trained models publicly available to further stimulate simulation development.
Luca Bergamini, Yawei Ye, Oliver Scheel, Chih Hu, Luca Del Pero, Blazej Osinski, Hugo Grimmett, Peter Ondruska
ICRA3
2021 What data do we need for training an AV motion planner?
abstract
We investigate what grade of sensor data is required for training an imitation-learning-based AV planner on human expert demonstration. Machine-learned planners [1] are very hungry for training data, which is usually collected using vehicles equipped with the same sensors used for autonomous operation [1]. This is costly and non-scalable. If cheaper sensors could be used for collection instead, data availability would go up, which is crucial in a field where data volume requirements are large and availability is small. We present experiments using up to 1000 hours worth of expert demonstration and find that training with 10x lower-quality data outperforms 1x AV-grade data in terms of planner performance (see Fig. 1). The important implication of this is that cheaper sensors can indeed be used. This serves to improve data access and democratize the field of imitation-based motion planning. Alongside this, we perform a sensitivity analysis of planner performance as a function of perception range, field-of-view, accuracy, and data volume, and reason about why lower-quality data still provide good planning results.
Lukas Platinsky, Stefanie Speichert, Blazej Osinski, Oliver Scheel, Yawei Ye, Hugo Grimmett, Luca Del Pero, Peter Ondruska
ICRA5
2019 Attention-based Lane Change Prediction
Oliver Scheel, Naveen Shankar Nagaraja, Loren Arthur Schwarz, Nassir Navab, Federico Tombari
ICRA1
2018 Situation Assessment for Planning Lane Changes: Combining Recurrent Models and Prediction
abstract
We introduce an extension of the Dubins Traveling Salesman Problem with Neighborhoods into the 3D space in which a fixed-wing aerial vehicle is requested to visit a set of target regions while the vehicle motion constraints are satisfied, i.e., the minimum turning radius and maximum climb and dive angles. The primary challenge is to address both the combinatorial optimization part of finding the sequence of target visits and the continuous optimization part of the final trajectory determination. Due to its high complexity, we propose to address both parts of the problem separately by a decoupled approach in which the sequence is determined by a new distance function designed explicitly for the utilized 3D Dubins Airplane model. The final trajectory is then found by a local optimization which improves the solution quality. The proposed approach provides significantly better solutions than using Euclidean distance in the sequencing part of the problem. Moreover, the found solutions are of the competitive quality to the sampling-based algorithm while its computational requirements are about two orders of magnitude lower.
Oliver Scheel, Loren Arthur Schwarz, Nassir Navab, Federico Tombari
ICRA1
2018 Situation Assessment for Planning Lane Changes: Combining Recurrent Models and Prediction
abstract
One of the greatest challenges towards fully autonomous cars is the understanding of complex and dynamic scenes. Such understanding is needed for planning of maneuvers, especially those that are particularly frequent such as lane changes. While in recent years advanced driver-assistance systems have made driving safer and more comfortable, these have mostly focused on car following scenarios, and less on maneuvers involving lane changes. In this work we propose a situation assessment algorithm for classifying driving situations with respect to their suitability for lane changing. For this, we propose a deep learning architecture based on a Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network, which uses Long Short-Term Memory units, and integrates a prediction component in the form of the Intelligent Driver Model. We prove the feasibility of our algorithm on the publicly available NGSIM datasets, where we outperform existing methods.
Oliver Scheel, Loren Arthur Schwarz, Nassir Navab, Federico Tombari
ICRA1