Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

So Nakashima

dblp:220/4097 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-5287-7475ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Approximation and online algorithms · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.412020
Lineage EM algorithm for inferring latent states from cellular lineage trees · Bioinform. 2020
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.412019
Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
greedy algorithm
0.412019
Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.412019
Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices · AAAI 2019
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.112019
Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices · AAAI 2019
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
subspace selection
0.112019
Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

greedy algorithm · 0.8DR-submodular maximization · 0.8latent variable estimation · 0.4expectation-maximization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Lineage EM algorithm for inferring latent states from cellular lineage trees
abstract
SUMMARY: Phenotypic variability in a population of cells can work as the bet-hedging of the cells under an unpredictably changing environment, the typical example of which is the bacterial persistence. To understand the strategy to control such phenomena, it is indispensable to identify the phenotype of each cell and its inheritance. Although recent advancements in microfluidic technology offer us useful lineage data, they are insufficient to directly identify the phenotypes of the cells. An alternative approach is to infer the phenotype from the lineage data by latent-variable estimation. To this end, however, we must resolve the bias problem in the inference from lineage called survivorship bias. In this work, we clarify how the survivorship bias distorts statistical estimations. We then propose a latent-variable estimation algorithm without the survivorship bias from lineage trees based on an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, which we call lineage EM algorithm (LEM). LEM provides a statistical method to identify the traits of the cells applicable to various kinds of lineage data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of LEM is available at https://github.com/so-nakashima/Lineage-EM-algorithm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
So Nakashima, Yuki Sughiyama, Tetsuya J. Kobayashi
Bioinform.1
2019 Subspace Selection via DR-Submodular Maximization on Lattices
abstract
The subspace selection problem seeks a subspace that maximizes an objective function under some constraint. This problem includes several important machine learning problems such as the principal component analysis and sparse dictionary selection problem. Often, these problems can be (exactly or approximately) solved using greedy algorithms. Here, we are interested in why these problems can be solved by greedy algorithms, and what classes of objective functions and constraints admit this property.In this study, we focus on the fact that the set of subspaces forms a lattice, then formulate the problems as optimization problems on lattices. Then, we introduce a new class of functions on lattices, directional DR-submodular functions, to characterize the approximability of problems. We prove that the principal component analysis, sparse dictionary selection problem, and these generalizations are monotone directional DRsubmodularity functions. We also prove the “quantum version” of the cut function is a non-monotone directional DR submodular function. Using these results, we propose new solvable feature selection problems (generalized principal component analysis and quantum maximum cut problem), and improve the approximation ratio of the sparse dictionary selection problem in certain instances.We show that, under several constraints, the directional DRsubmodular function maximization problem can be solved efficiently with provable approximation factors.
So Nakashima, Takanori Maehara
AAAI1