Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henry Elder

dblp:220/4138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 93% Question answering and dialogue systems · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.922020
How to Make Neural Natural Language Generation as Reliable as Templates in Task-Oriented Dialogue · EMNLP (1) 2020
Shape of Synth to Come: Why We Should Use Synthetic Data for English Surface Realization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
surface realization
0.412020
Shape of Synth to Come: Why We Should Use Synthetic Data for English Surface Realization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
synthetic data
0.412020
Shape of Synth to Come: Why We Should Use Synthetic Data for English Surface Realization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.112020
How to Make Neural Natural Language Generation as Reliable as Templates in Task-Oriented Dialogue · EMNLP (1) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

template-based generation · 0.4data augmentation · 0.4BLEU evaluation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Shape of Synth to Come: Why We Should Use Synthetic Data for English Surface Realization
abstract
The Surface Realization Shared Tasks of 2018 and 2019 were Natural Language Generation shared tasks with the goal of exploring approaches to surface realization from Universal-Dependency-like trees to surface strings for several languages.In the 2018 shared task there was very little difference in the absolute performance of systems trained with and without additional, synthetically created data, and a new rule prohibiting the use of synthetic data was introduced for the 2019 shared task.Contrary to the findings of the 2018 shared task, we show, in experiments on the English 2018 dataset, that the use of synthetic data can have a substantial positive effect -an improvement of almost 8 BLEU points for a previously state-of-the-art system.We analyse the effects of synthetic data, and we argue that its use should be encouraged rather than prohibited so that future research efforts continue to explore systems that can take advantage of such data.
Henry Elder, Robert Burke, Alexander O'Connor, Jennifer Foster
ACL1
2020 How to Make Neural Natural Language Generation as Reliable as Templates in Task-Oriented Dialogue
abstract
Neural Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems are well known for their unreliability.To overcome this issue, we propose a data augmentation approach which allows us to restrict the output of a network and guarantee reliability.While this restriction means generation will be less diverse than if randomly sampled, we include experiments that demonstrate the tendency of existing neural generation approaches to produce dull and repetitive text, and we argue that reliability is more important than diversity for this task.The system trained using this approach scored 100% in semantic accuracy on the E2E NLG Challenge dataset, the same as a template system.
Henry Elder, Alexander O'Connor, Jennifer Foster
EMNLP (1)1
2018 E2E NLG Challenge Submission: Towards Controllable Generation of Diverse Natural Language
abstract
In natural language generation (NLG), the task is to generate utterances from a more abstract input, such as structured data.An added challenge is to generate utterances that contain an accurate representation of the input, while reflecting the fluency and variety of human-generated text.In this paper, we report experiments with NLG models that can be used in task oriented dialogue systems.We explore the use of additional input to the model to encourage diversity and control of outputs.While our submission does not rank highly using automated metrics, qualitative investigation of generated utterances suggests the use of additional information in neural network NLG systems to be a promising research direction.
Henry Elder, Sebastian Gehrmann, Alexander O'Connor, Qun Liu 0001
INLG1
2018 End-to-End Content and Plan Selection for Data-to-Text Generation
abstract
Learning to generate fluent natural language from structured data with neural networks has become an common approach for NLG.This problem can be challenging when the form of the structured data varies between examples.This paper presents a survey of several extensions to sequence-to-sequence models to account for the latent content selection process, particularly variants of copy attention and coverage decoding.We further propose a training method based on diverse ensembling to encourage models to learn distinct sentence templates during training.An empirical evaluation of these techniques shows an increase in the quality of generated text across five automated metrics, as well as human evaluation.
Sebastian Gehrmann, Falcon Z. Dai, Henry Elder, Alexander M. Rush
INLG3