Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias Lindemann
dblp:220/5444
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3653-0161ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 24% Language models and text generation · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 77% Programming languages and type systems · 23% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
1.6 | 4 | 2024 | Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent Permutations · ACL (1) 2023 Compositional Semantic Parsing across Graphbanks · ACL (1) 2019 AMR dependency parsing with a typed semantic algebra · ACL (1) 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
causal world model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › language-based planning
LLM-based planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
intermediate pre-training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic Transformations · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic Transformations · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by Simulation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
structural inductive bias |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by Simulation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
systematic generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by Simulation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent Permutations · ACL (1) 2023 |
Compilers and program optimization
parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fast semantic parsing with well-typedness guarantees · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semantic graph parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Compositional Semantic Parsing across Graphbanks · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | AMR dependency parsing with a typed semantic algebra · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
chunking |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic Transformations · EMNLP 2024 |
Programming languages and type systems
type systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Fast semantic parsing with well-typedness guarantees · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.5large language model · 0.9causal representation learning · 0.9simulation of finite state transducers · 0.8pre-training · 0.8attention analysis · 0.8seq2seq · 0.7regularized linear program · 0.7backpropagation through solver · 0.7transition-based parsing · 0.4a* search · 0.4BERT embeddings · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Language Agents Meet Causality - Bridging LLMs and Causal World ModelsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown great promise in planning and reasoning applications. These tasks demand robust systems, which arguably require a causal understanding of the environment. While LLMs can acquire and reflect common sense causal knowledge from their pretraining data, this information is often incomplete, incorrect, or inapplicable to a specific environment. In contrast, causal representation learning (CRL) focuses on identifying the underlying causal structure within a given environment. We propose a framework that integrates CRLs with LLMs to enable causally-aware reasoning and planning. This framework learns a causal world model, with causal variables linked to natural language expressions. This mapping provides LLMs with a flexible interface to process and generate descriptions of actions and states in text form. Effectively, the causal world model acts as a simulator that the LLM can query and interact with. We evaluate the framework on causal inference and planning tasks across temporal scales and environmental complexities. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, with the causally-aware method outperforming LLM-based reasoners, especially for longer planning horizons. John Gkountouras, Matthias Lindemann, Phillip Lippe, Efstratios Gavves, Ivan Titov 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by SimulationabstractStrong inductive biases enable learning from little data and help generalization outside of the training distribution.Popular neural architectures such as Transformers lack strong structural inductive biases for seq2seq NLP tasks on their own.Consequently, they struggle with systematic generalization beyond the training distribution, e.g. with extrapolating to longer inputs, even when pre-trained on large amounts of text.We show how a structural inductive bias can be efficiently injected into a seq2seq model by pre-training it to simulate structural transformations on synthetic data.Specifically, we inject an inductive bias towards Finite State Transducers (FSTs) into a Transformer by pretraining it to simulate FSTs given their descriptions.Our experiments show that our method imparts the desired inductive bias, resulting in improved systematic generalization and better few-shot learning for FST-like tasks.Our analysis shows that fine-tuned models accurately capture the state dynamics of the unseen underlying FSTs, suggesting that the simulation process is internalized by the fine-tuned model. 1 Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan Titov 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic TransformationsabstractModels need appropriate inductive biases to effectively learn from small amounts of data and generalize systematically outside of the training distribution.While Transformers are highly versatile and powerful, they can still benefit from enhanced structural inductive biases for seq2seq tasks, especially those involving syntactic transformations, such as converting active to passive voice or semantic parsing.In this paper, we propose to strengthen the structural inductive bias of a Transformer by intermediate pre-training to perform synthetically generated syntactic transformations of dependency trees given a description of the transformation.Our experiments confirm that this helps with fewshot learning of syntactic tasks such as chunking, and also improves structural generalization for semantic parsing.Our analysis shows that the intermediate pre-training leads to attention heads that keep track of which syntactic transformation needs to be applied to which token, and that the model can leverage these attention heads on downstream tasks. 1 Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan Titov 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent PermutationsabstractSeq2seq models have been shown to struggle with compositional generalization in semantic parsing, i.e. generalizing to unseen compositions of phenomena that the model handles correctly in isolation.We phrase semantic parsing as a two-step process: we first tag each input token with a multiset of output tokens.Then we arrange the tokens into an output sequence using a new way of parameterizing and predicting permutations.We formulate predicting a permutation as solving a regularized linear program and we backpropagate through the solver.In contrast to prior work, our approach does not place a priori restrictions on possible permutations, making it very expressive.Our model outperforms pretrained seq2seq models and prior work on realistic semantic parsing tasks that require generalization to longer examples.We also outperform non-tree-based models on structural generalization on the COGS benchmark.For the first time, we show that a model without an inductive bias provided by trees achieves high accuracy on generalization to deeper recursion depth. 1 Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan Titov 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Compositional Generalisation with Structured Reordering and Fertility LayersabstractSeq2seq models have been shown to struggle with compositional generalisation, i.e. generalising to new and potentially more complex structures than seen during training.Taking inspiration from grammar-based models that excel at compositional generalisation, we present a flexible end-to-end differentiable neural model that composes two structural operations: a fertility step, which we introduce in this work, and a reordering step based on previous work (Wang et al., 2021).To ensure differentiability, we use the expected value of each step, which we compute using dynamic programming.Our model outperforms seq2seq models by a wide margin on challenging compositional splits of realistic semantic parsing tasks that require generalisation to longer examples.It also compares favourably to other models targeting compositional generalisation. 1 Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan Titov 0001 |
EACL | 1 |
| 2020 | Normalizing Compositional Structures Across GraphbanksabstractThe emergence of a variety of graph-based meaning representations (MRs) has sparked an important conversation about how to adequately represent semantic structure.MRs exhibit structural differences that reflect different theoretical and design considerations, presenting challenges to uniform linguistic analysis and cross-framework semantic parsing.Here, we ask the question of which design differences between MRs are meaningful and semantically-rooted, and which are superficial.We present a methodology for normalizing discrepancies between MRs at the compositional level (Lindemann et al., 2019), finding that we can normalize the majority of divergent phenomena using linguistically-grounded rules.Our work significantly increases the match in compositional structure between MRs and improves multi-task learning (MTL) in a low-resource setting, serving as a proof of concept for future broad-scale cross-MR normalization. Lucia Donatelli, Jonas Groschwitz, Matthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Pia Weißenhorn |
COLING | 3 |
| 2020 | Fast semantic parsing with well-typedness guaranteesabstractAM dependency parsing is a linguistically principled method for neural semantic parsing with high accuracy across multiple graphbanks. It relies on a type system that models semantic valency but makes existing parsers slow. We describe an A* parser and a transition-based parser for AM dependency parsing which guarantee well-typedness and improve parsing speed by up to 3 orders of magnitude, while maintaining or improving accuracy. Matthias Lindemann, Jonas Groschwitz, Alexander Koller |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Compositional Semantic Parsing across GraphbanksabstractMost semantic parsers that map sentences to graph-based meaning representations are handdesigned for specific graphbanks.We present a compositional neural semantic parser which achieves, for the first time, competitive accuracies across a diverse range of graphbanks.Incorporating BERT embeddings and multi-task learning improves the accuracy further, setting new states of the art on DM, PAS, PSD, AMR 2015 and EDS. Matthias Lindemann, Jonas Groschwitz, Alexander Koller |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | AMR dependency parsing with a typed semantic algebraabstractJonas Groschwitz, Matthias Lindemann, Meaghan Fowlie, Mark Johnson, Alexander Koller. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018. Jonas Groschwitz, Matthias Lindemann, Meaghan Fowlie, Mark Johnson 0001, Alexander Koller |
ACL (1) | 2 |