Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johann Brehmer
dblp:220/5763
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network performance modeling · 50% Physical-layer communications · 50% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Lorentz-Equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformers for High-Energy Physics · NeurIPS 2024 Geometric Algebra Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Physical-layer communications › channel estimation
channel prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable and Learnable Wireless Simulation with Geometric Transformers · ICLR 2025 |
Network performance modeling › network simulation
wireless network simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable and Learnable Wireless Simulation with Geometric Transformers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lorentz-Equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformers for High-Energy Physics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
riemannian flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lorentz-Equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformers for High-Energy Physics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDGI: Equivariant Diffusion for Planning with Embodied Agents · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
e(3) equivariant model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometric Algebra Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDGI: Equivariant Diffusion for Planning with Embodied Agents · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDGI: Equivariant Diffusion for Planning with Embodied Agents · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometric Algebra Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDGI: Equivariant Diffusion for Planning with Embodied Agents · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
causal representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Weakly supervised causal representation learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
latent variable causal models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Weakly supervised causal representation learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Weakly supervised causal representation learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lorentz-Equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformers for High-Energy Physics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › object modeling › geometric modeling
geometric representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Geometric Algebra Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Geometric Algebra Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
geometric algebra transformer · 3.3equivariant neural network · 1.7flow matching · 1.5transformer · 0.7geometric algebra · 0.7equivariance · 0.7diffusion model · 0.7classifier guidance · 0.7intervention · 0.6identifiability · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentiable and Learnable Wireless Simulation with Geometric TransformersabstractModelling the propagation of electromagnetic wireless signals is critical for designing modern communication systems. Wireless ray tracing simulators model signal propagation based on the 3D geometry and other scene parameters, but their accuracy is fundamentally limited by underlying modelling assumptions and correctness of parameters. In this work, we introduce Wi-GATr, a fully-learnable neural simulation surrogate designed to predict the channel observations based on scene primitives (e. g., surface mesh, antenna position and orientation). Recognizing the inherently geometric nature of these primitives, Wi-GATr leverages an equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformer that operates on a tokenizer specifically tailored for wireless simulation. We evaluate our approach on a range of tasks (i. e., signal strength and delay spread prediction, receiver localization, and geometry reconstruction) and find that Wi-GATr is accurate, fast, sample-efficient, and robust to symmetry-induced transformations. Remarkably, we find our results also translate well to the real world: Wi-GATr demonstrates more than 35% lower error than hybrid techniques, and 70% lower error than a calibrated wireless tracer. Thomas M. Hehn, Markus Peschl, Tribhuvanesh Orekondy, Arash Behboodi, Johann Brehmer |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2024 | Euclidean, Projective, Conformal: Choosing a Geometric Algebra for Equivariant TransformersabstractThe Geometric Algebra Transformer (GATr) is a versatile architecture for geometric deep learning based on projective geometric algebra. We generalize this architecture into a blueprint that allows one to construct a scalable transformer architecture given any geometric (or Clifford) algebra. We study versions of this architecture for Euclidean, projective, and conformal algebras, all of which are suited to represent 3D data, and evaluate them in theory and practice. The simplest Euclidean architecture is computationally cheap, but has a smaller symmetry group and is not as sample-efficient, while the projective model is not sufficiently expressive. Both the conformal algebra and an improved version of the projective algebra define powerful, performant architectures. Pim de Haan, Taco Cohen, Johann Brehmer |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2024 | Lorentz-Equivariant Geometric Algebra Transformers for High-Energy PhysicsabstractExtracting scientific understanding from particle-physics experiments requires solving diverse learning problems with high precision and good data efficiency. We propose the Lorentz Geometric Algebra Transformer (L-GATr), a new multi-purpose architecture for high-energy physics. L-GATr represents high-energy data in a geometric algebra over four-dimensional space-time and is equivariant under Lorentz transformations, the symmetry group of relativistic kinematics. At the same time, the architecture is a Transformer, which makes it versatile and scalable to large systems. L-GATr is first demonstrated on regression and classification tasks from particle physics. We then construct the first Lorentz-equivariant generative model: a continuous normalizing flow based on an L-GATr network, trained with Riemannian flow matching. Across our experiments, L-GATr is on par with or outperforms strong domain-specific baselines. Jonas Spinner, Victor Bresó, Pim de Haan, Tilman Plehn, Jesse Thaler, Johann Brehmer |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | EDGI: Equivariant Diffusion for Planning with Embodied AgentsabstractEmbodied agents operate in a structured world, often solving tasks with spatial, temporal, and permutation symmetries. Most algorithms for planning and model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) do not take this rich geometric structure into account, leading to sample inefficiency and poor generalization. We introduce the Equivariant Diffuser for Generating Interactions (EDGI), an algorithm for MBRL and planning that is equivariant with respect to the product of the spatial symmetry group SE(3), the discrete-time translation group ℤ, and the object permutation group Sₙ. EDGI follows the Diffuser framework by Janner et al. (2022) in treating both learning a world model and planning in it as a conditional generative modeling problem, training a diffusion model on an offline trajectory dataset. We introduce a new SE(3) × ℤ × Sₙ-equivariant diffusion model that supports multiple representations. We integrate this model in a planning loop, where conditioning and classifier guidance let us softly break the symmetry for specific tasks as needed. On object manipulation and navigation tasks, EDGI is substantially more sample efficient and generalizes better across the symmetry group than non-equivariant models. Johann Brehmer, Joey Bose, Pim de Haan, Taco Cohen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Geometric Algebra TransformerabstractProblems involving geometric data arise in physics, chemistry, robotics, computer vision, and many other fields. Such data can take numerous forms, for instance points, direction vectors, translations, or rotations, but to date there is no single architecture that can be applied to such a wide variety of geometric types while respecting their symmetries. In this paper we introduce the Geometric Algebra Transformer (GATr), a general-purpose architecture for geometric data. GATr represents inputs, outputs, and hidden states in the projective geometric (or Clifford) algebra, which offers an efficient 16-dimensional vector-space representation of common geometric objects as well as operators acting on them. GATr is equivariant with respect to E(3), the symmetry group of 3D Euclidean space. As a Transformer, GATr is versatile, efficient, and scalable. We demonstrate GATr in problems from n-body modeling to wall-shear-stress estimation on large arterial meshes to robotic motion planning. GATr consistently outperforms both non-geometric and equivariant baselines in terms of error, data efficiency, and scalability. Johann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Sönke Behrends, Taco Cohen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Weakly supervised causal representation learningabstractLearning high-level causal representations together with a causal model from unstructured low-level data such as pixels is impossible from observational data alone. We prove under mild assumptions that this representation is however identifiable in a weakly supervised setting. This involves a dataset with paired samples before and after random, unknown interventions, but no further labels. We then introduce implicit latent causal models, variational autoencoders that represent causal variables and causal structure without having to optimize an explicit discrete graph structure. On simple image data, including a novel dataset of simulated robotic manipulation, we demonstrate that such models can reliably identify the causal structure and disentangle causal variables. Johann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Phillip Lippe, Taco Cohen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationabstractWe introduce manifold-learning flows (ℳ-flows), a new class of generative models that simultaneously learn the data manifold as well as a tractable probability density on that manifold. Combining aspects of normalizing flows, GANs, autoencoders, and energy-based models, they have the potential to represent data sets with a manifold structure more faithfully and provide handles on dimensionality reduction, denoising, and out-of-distribution detection. We argue why such models should not be trained by maximum likelihood alone and present a new training algorithm that separates manifold and density updates. In a range of experiments we demonstrate how ℳ-flows learn the data manifold and allow for better inference than standard flows in the ambient data space. Johann Brehmer, Kyle Cranmer |
NeurIPS | 1 |