Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Beauchene
dblp:220/7622
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 65% Parallel and multicore computing · 28% High-performance computing · 6% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
hard real-time scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming runtimes |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
parallel real-time task scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
High-performance computing
barrier elimination |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing
synchronization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
resource throttling · 0.3per-hardware-thread scheduling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Low-Bit Quantization and Quantization-Aware Training for Small-Footprint Keyword SpottingabstractIn this paper, we investigate novel quantization approaches to reduce memory and computational footprint of deep neural network (DNN) based keyword spotters (KWS). We propose a new method for KWS offline and online quantization, which we call dynamic quantization, where we quantize DNN weight matrices column-wise, using each column's exact individual min-max range, and the DNN layers' inputs and outputs are quantized for every input audio frame individually, using the exact min-max range of each input and output vector. We further apply a new quantization-aware training approach that allows us to incorporate quantization errors into KWS model during training. Together, these approaches allow us to significantly improve the performance of KWS in 4-bit and 8-bit quantized precision, achieving the end-to-end accuracy close to that of full precision models while reducing the models' on-device memory footprint by up to 80%. Yuriy Mishchenko, Yusuf Goren, Ming Sun 0007, Chris Beauchene, Spyridon Matsoukas, Oleg Rybakov, Shiv Vitaladevuni |
ICMLA | 4 |
| 2018 | Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systemsabstractHigh performance parallel computing demands careful synchronization, timing, performance isolation and control, as well as the avoidance of OS and other types of noise. The employment of soft real-time systems toward these ends has already shown considerable promise, particularly for distributed memory machines. As processor core counts grow rapidly, a natural question is whether similar promise extends to the node. To address this question, we present the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of a hard real-time scheduler specifically for high performance parallel computing on shared memory nodes built on x64 processors, such as the Xeon Phi. Our scheduler is embedded in a kernel framework that is already specialized for high performance parallel run-times and applications, and that meets the basic requirements needed for a real-time OS (RTOS). The scheduler adds hard real-time threads both in their classic, individual form, and in a group form in which a group of parallel threads execute in near lock-step using only scalable, per-hardware-thread scheduling. On a current generation Intel Xeon Phi, the scheduler is able to handle timing constraints down to resolution of ∼13,000 cycles (∼10 μs), with synchronization to within ∼4,000 cycles (∼3 μs) among 255 parallel threads. The scheduler isolates a parallel group and is able to provide resource throttling with commensurate application performance. We also show that in some cases such fine-grain control over time allows us to eliminate barrier synchronization, leading to performance gains, particularly for fine-grain BSP workloads. Peter A. Dinda, Jinghang Wang, Chris Beauchene, Conor Hetland |
HPDC | 4 |