Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Beauchene

dblp:220/7622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 65% Parallel and multicore computing · 28% High-performance computing · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
hard real-time scheduling
0.312018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming runtimes
0.312018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
parallel real-time task scheduling
0.312018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.312018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018
High-performance computing
barrier elimination
0.112018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018
Parallel and multicore computing
synchronization
0.112018
Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems · HPDC 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resource throttling · 0.3per-hardware-thread scheduling · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Low-Bit Quantization and Quantization-Aware Training for Small-Footprint Keyword Spotting
abstract
In this paper, we investigate novel quantization approaches to reduce memory and computational footprint of deep neural network (DNN) based keyword spotters (KWS). We propose a new method for KWS offline and online quantization, which we call dynamic quantization, where we quantize DNN weight matrices column-wise, using each column's exact individual min-max range, and the DNN layers' inputs and outputs are quantized for every input audio frame individually, using the exact min-max range of each input and output vector. We further apply a new quantization-aware training approach that allows us to incorporate quantization errors into KWS model during training. Together, these approaches allow us to significantly improve the performance of KWS in 4-bit and 8-bit quantized precision, achieving the end-to-end accuracy close to that of full precision models while reducing the models' on-device memory footprint by up to 80%.
Yuriy Mishchenko, Yusuf Goren, Ming Sun 0007, Chris Beauchene, Spyridon Matsoukas, Oleg Rybakov, Shiv Vitaladevuni
ICMLA4
2018 Hard real-time scheduling for parallel run-time systems
abstract
High performance parallel computing demands careful synchronization, timing, performance isolation and control, as well as the avoidance of OS and other types of noise. The employment of soft real-time systems toward these ends has already shown considerable promise, particularly for distributed memory machines. As processor core counts grow rapidly, a natural question is whether similar promise extends to the node. To address this question, we present the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of a hard real-time scheduler specifically for high performance parallel computing on shared memory nodes built on x64 processors, such as the Xeon Phi. Our scheduler is embedded in a kernel framework that is already specialized for high performance parallel run-times and applications, and that meets the basic requirements needed for a real-time OS (RTOS). The scheduler adds hard real-time threads both in their classic, individual form, and in a group form in which a group of parallel threads execute in near lock-step using only scalable, per-hardware-thread scheduling. On a current generation Intel Xeon Phi, the scheduler is able to handle timing constraints down to resolution of ∼13,000 cycles (∼10 μs), with synchronization to within ∼4,000 cycles (∼3 μs) among 255 parallel threads. The scheduler isolates a parallel group and is able to provide resource throttling with commensurate application performance. We also show that in some cases such fine-grain control over time allows us to eliminate barrier synchronization, leading to performance gains, particularly for fine-grain BSP workloads.
Peter A. Dinda, Jinghang Wang, Chris Beauchene, Conor Hetland
HPDC4