Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jasmine Stone

dblp:221/2700 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0690-0141ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
gaussian process factor analysis
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
scalable variational inference
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience
0.512021
Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-gaussian noise model · 1.0automatic relevance determination · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models
abstract
Latent variable models are ubiquitous in the exploratory analysis of neural population recordings, where they allow researchers to summarize the activity of large populations of neurons in lower dimensional ‘latent’ spaces. Existing methods can generally be categorized into (i) Bayesian methods that facilitate flexible incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainty estimation, but which typically do not scale to large datasets; and (ii) highly parameterized methods without explicit priors that scale better but often struggle in the low-data regime. Here, we bridge this gap by developing a fully Bayesian yet scalable version of Gaussian process factor analysis (bGPFA), which models neural data as arising from a set of inferred latent processes with a prior that encourages smoothness over time. Additionally, bGPFA uses automatic relevance determination to infer the dimensionality of neural activity directly from the training data during optimization. To enable the analysis of continuous recordings without trial structure, we introduce a novel variational inference strategy that scales near-linearly in time and also allows for non-Gaussian noise models appropriate for electrophysiological recordings. We apply bGPFA to continuous recordings spanning 30 minutes with over 14 million data points from primate motor and somatosensory cortices during a self-paced reaching task. We show that neural activity progresses from an initial state at target onset to a reach- specific preparatory state well before movement onset. The distance between these initial and preparatory latent states is predictive of reaction times across reaches, suggesting that such preparatory dynamics have behavioral relevance despite the lack of externally imposed delay periods. Additionally, bGPFA discovers latent processes that evolve over slow timescales on the order of several seconds and contain complementary information about reaction time. These timescales are longer than those revealed by methods which focus on individual movement epochs and may reflect fluctuations in e.g. task engagement.
Kristopher T. Jensen, Ta-Chu Kao, Jasmine Stone, Guillaume Hennequin
NeurIPS3
2018 Community-based benchmarking improves spike rate inference from two-photon calcium imaging data
abstract
In recent years, two-photon calcium imaging has become a standard tool to probe the function of neural circuits and to study computations in neuronal populations. However, the acquired signal is only an indirect measurement of neural activity due to the comparatively slow dynamics of fluorescent calcium indicators. Different algorithms for estimating spike rates from noisy calcium measurements have been proposed in the past, but it is an open question how far performance can be improved. Here, we report the results of the spikefinder challenge, launched to catalyze the development of new spike rate inference algorithms through crowd-sourcing. We present ten of the submitted algorithms which show improved performance compared to previously evaluated methods. Interestingly, the top-performing algorithms are based on a wide range of principles from deep neural networks to generative models, yet provide highly correlated estimates of the neural activity. The competition shows that benchmark challenges can drive algorithmic developments in neuroscience.
Philipp Berens, Jeremy Freeman, Thomas Deneux, Nicolay Chenkov, Thomas McColgan, Artur Speiser, Jakob H. Macke, Srinivas C. Turaga, Patrick J. Mineault, Peter Rupprecht, Stephan Gerhard, Rainer W. Friedrich, Johannes Friedrich, Liam Paninski, Marius Pachitariu, Kenneth D. Harris, Ben Bolte, Timothy A. Machado, Dario Ringach, Jasmine Stone, Luke E. Rogerson, Nicolas J. Sofroniew, Jacob Reimer, Emmanouil Froudarakis, Thomas Euler, Miroslav Román Rosón, Lucas Theis, Andreas S. Tolias, Matthias Bethge
PLoS Comput. Biol.20