EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shichong Peng
dblp:221/4790
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-8404-6392ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 62% 3D vision · 10% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Rendering · 68% Computer animation and physical simulation · 18% Geometric modeling and processing · 5% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › maximum likelihood learning
implicit maximum likelihood estimation |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Adaptive IMLE for Few-shot Pretraining-free Generative Modelling · ICML 2023 CHIMLE: Conditional Hierarchical IMLE for Multimodal Conditional Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2022 Multimodal Image Synthesis with Conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › multimodal generation
multimodal image synthesis |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | CHIMLE: Conditional Hierarchical IMLE for Multimodal Conditional Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2022 Multimodal Image Synthesis with Conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation › data-efficient image generation
few-shot image generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rejection Sampling IMLE: Designing Priors for Better Few-Shot Image Synthesis · ECCV (21) 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
prior design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rejection Sampling IMLE: Designing Priors for Better Few-Shot Image Synthesis · ECCV (21) 2024 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › animation generation
dynamic scene interpolation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation · CVPR 2024 |
Rendering
neural rendering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation · CVPR 2024 |
Rendering › point-based rendering
point cloud rendering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation · CVPR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
adaptive training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive IMLE for Few-shot Pretraining-free Generative Modelling · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
mode coverage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive IMLE for Few-shot Pretraining-free Generative Modelling · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › point set representation
point cloud representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PAPR: Proximity Attention Point Rendering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Rendering
differentiable rendering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PAPR: Proximity Attention Point Rendering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Rendering
point-based rendering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PAPR: Proximity Attention Point Rendering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
conditional image synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CHIMLE: Conditional Hierarchical IMLE for Multimodal Conditional Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape deformation
non-rigid deformation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation · CVPR 2024 |
Computational photography and imaging › 3d vision
scene geometry reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PAPR: Proximity Attention Point Rendering · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | CHIMLE: Conditional Hierarchical IMLE for Multimodal Conditional Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
implicit maximum likelihood estimation · 2.6regularization · 1.5proximity attention point rendering · 1.5proximity attention · 1.3feature-based color prediction · 1.3differentiable rendering · 1.3hierarchical generation · 1.1rejection sampling · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.7conditional implicit maximum likelihood estimation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PAPR Up-Close: Close-Up Neural Point Rendering Without HolesabstractPoint-based representations have recently gained popularity in neural rendering. While they offer many advantages, rendering them from close-up views often results in holes. In splatting-based neural point renderers, these are caused by gaps between different splats, which cause many rays to not intersect with any splat when viewed close-up. A different line of work uses attention to estimate each ray's intersection by interpolating between nearby points. Our work builds on one such method, known as Proximity Attention Point Rendering (PAPR), which learns parsimonious and geometrically accurate point representations. While in principle PAPR can fill holes by learning to interpolate between nearby points appropriately, PAPR also produces holes when rendering close-up, as the intersection point is often predicted incorrectly. We analyze this phenomenon and propose two novel solutions: a method for dynamically selecting nearby points to a ray for interpolation, and a robust attention method that better generalizes to local point configuration around unseen rays. These significantly reduce the prevalence of holes and other artifacts in close-up rendering compared to recent neural point renderers. Yanshu Zhang, Chirag Vashist, Shichong Peng, Ke Li 0011 |
3DV | 3 |
| 2024 | PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene InterpolationabstractWe propose the problem of point-level 3D scene interpolation, which aims to simultaneously reconstruct a 3D scene in two states from multiple views, synthesize smooth point-level interpolations between them, and render the scene from novel viewpoints, all without any supervision between the states. The primary challenge is on achieving a smooth transition between states that may involve significant and non-rigid changes. To address these challenges, we introduce “PAPR in Motion”, a novel approach that builds upon the recent Proximity Attention Point Rendering (PAPR) technique, which can deform a point cloud to match a significantly different shape and render a visually coherent scene even after non-rigid deformations. Our approach is specifically designed to maintain the temporal consistency of the geometric structure by introducing various regularization techniques for PAPR. The result is a method that can effectively bridge large scene changes and produce visually coherent and temporally smooth interpolations in both geometry and appearance. Evaluation across diverse motion types demonstrates that “PAPR in Motion” outperforms the leading neural renderer for dynamic scenes. For more results and code, please visit our project website at https://niopeng.github.io/PAPR-in-Motion/. Shichong Peng, Yanshu Zhang, Ke Li 0011 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | Rejection Sampling IMLE: Designing Priors for Better Few-Shot Image Synthesis
Chirag Vashist, Shichong Peng, Ke Li 0011 |
ECCV (21) | 2 |
| 2023 | Adaptive IMLE for Few-shot Pretraining-free Generative ModellingabstractDespite their success on large datasets, GANs have been difficult to apply in the few-shot setting, where only a limited number of training examples are provided. Due to mode collapse, GANs tend to ignore some training examples, causing overfitting to a subset of the training dataset, which is small in the first place. A recent method called Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (IMLE) is an alternative to GAN that tries to address this issue. It uses the same kind of generators as GANs but trains it with a different objective that encourages mode coverage. However, the theoretical guarantees of IMLE hold under a restrictive condition that the optimal likelihood at all data points is the same. In this paper, we present a more generalized formulation of IMLE which includes the original formulation as a special case, and we prove that the theoretical guarantees hold under weaker conditions. Using this generalized formulation, we further derive a new algorithm, which we dub Adaptive IMLE, which can adapt to the varying difficulty of different training examples. We demonstrate on multiple few-shot image synthesis datasets that our method significantly outperforms existing methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/mehranagh20/AdaIMLE. Mehran Aghabozorgi, Shichong Peng, Ke Li 0011 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | PAPR: Proximity Attention Point RenderingabstractLearning accurate and parsimonious point cloud representations of scene surfaces from scratch remains a challenge in 3D representation learning. Existing point-based methods often suffer from the vanishing gradient problem or require a large number of points to accurately model scene geometry and texture. To address these limitations, we propose Proximity Attention Point Rendering (PAPR), a novel method that consists of a point-based scene representation and a differentiable renderer. Our scene representation uses a point cloud where each point is characterized by its spatial position, influence score, and view-independent feature vector. The renderer selects the relevant points for each ray and produces accurate colours using their associated features. PAPR effectively learns point cloud positions to represent the correct scene geometry, even when the initialization drastically differs from the target geometry. Notably, our method captures fine texture details while using only a parsimonious set of points. We also demonstrate four practical applications of our method: zero-shot geometry editing, object manipulation, texture transfer, and exposure control. More results and code are available on our project website at https://zvict.github.io/papr/. Yanshu Zhang, Shichong Peng, Alireza Moazeni, Ke Li 0011 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | CHIMLE: Conditional Hierarchical IMLE for Multimodal Conditional Image SynthesisabstractA persistent challenge in conditional image synthesis has been to generate diverse output images from the same input image despite only one output image being observed per input image. GAN-based methods are prone to mode collapse, which leads to low diversity. To get around this, we leverage Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (IMLE) which can overcome mode collapse fundamentally. IMLE uses the same generator as GANs but trains it with a different, non-adversarial objective which ensures each observed image has a generated sample nearby. Unfortunately, to generate high-fidelity images, prior IMLE-based methods require a large number of samples, which is expensive. In this paper, we propose a new method to get around this limitation, which we dub Conditional Hierarchical IMLE (CHIMLE), which can generate high-fidelity images without requiring many samples. We show CHIMLE significantly outperforms the prior best IMLE, GAN and diffusion-based methods in terms of image fidelity and mode coverage across four tasks, namely night-to-day, 16x single image super-resolution, image colourization and image decompression. Quantitatively, our method improves Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) by 36.9% on average compared to the prior best IMLE-based method, and by 27.5% on average compared to the best non-IMLE-based general-purpose methods. More results and code are available on the project website at https://niopeng.github.io/CHIMLE/. Shichong Peng, Alireza Moazeni, Ke Li 0011 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Multimodal Image Synthesis with Conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Ke Li 0011, Shichong Peng, Jitendra Malik |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2018 | Gender, confidence, and mark prediction in CS examinationsabstractA common refrain heard by instructors of CS1 courses is ``I'm sure I did better than that" or ``I have no idea how I got that mark". Sometimes differences in a student's expected and reported marks may be due to a mistake on the part of the grader of the work, but more often than not this is an indicator that a student is not accurately assessing their own level of achievement on a piece of work. This may be an issue of capability (some students may lack the tools to assess what they have done correctly or incorrectly?) or one of confidence (some students are certain they are making mistakes even if they have done everything correctly). Regardless of the source of the gap between predicted and reported grades, it is an important skill for students to be able to accurately assess their own capabilities and performance. Brian Harrington 0001, Shichong Peng, Xiaomeng Jin, Minhaz Khan |
ITiCSE | 2 |