Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dieter Galea
dblp:221/6895
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
biomedical named entity recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolite identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
tandem mass spectrometry |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised machine learning · 0.7cross-validation · 0.7fragmentation pattern matching · 0.3fingerprint matching · 0.3database search · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognitionabstractMotivation: Recognition of biomedical entities from scientific text is a critical component of natural language processing and automated information extraction platforms. Modern named entity recognition approaches rely heavily on supervised machine learning techniques, which are critically dependent on annotated training corpora. These approaches have been shown to perform well when trained and tested on the same source. However, in such scenario, the performance and evaluation of these models may be optimistic, as such models may not necessarily generalize to independent corpora, resulting in potential non-optimal entity recognition for large-scale tagging of widely diverse articles in databases such as PubMed. Results: Here we aggregated published corpora for the recognition of biomolecular entities (such as genes, RNA, proteins, variants, drugs and metabolites), identified entity class overlap and performed leave-corpus-out cross validation strategy to test the efficiency of existing models. We demonstrate that accuracies of models trained on individual corpora decrease substantially for recognition of the same biomolecular entity classes in independent corpora. This behavior is possibly due to limited generalizability of entity-class-related features captured by individual corpora (model 'overtraining') which we investigated further at the orthographic level, as well as potential annotation standard differences. We show that the combined use of multi-source training corpora results in overall more generalizable models for named entity recognition, while achieving comparable individual performance. By performing learning-curve-based power analysis we further identified that performance is often not limited by the quantity of the annotated data. Availability and implementation: Compiled primary and secondary sources of the aggregated corpora are available on: https://github.com/dterg/biomedical_corpora/wiki and https://bitbucket.org/iAnalytica/bioner. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Dieter Galea, Ivan Laponogov, Kirill A. Veselkov |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2018 | ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometryabstractMotivation: High-resolution mass spectrometry permits simultaneous detection of thousands of different metabolites in biological samples; however, their automated annotation still presents a challenge due to the limited number of tailored computational solutions freely available to the scientific community. Results: Here, we introduce ChemDistiller, a customizable engine that combines automated large-scale annotation of metabolites using tandem MS data with a compiled database containing tens of millions of compounds with pre-calculated 'fingerprints' and fragmentation patterns. Our tests using publicly and commercially available tandem MS spectra for reference compounds show retrievals rates comparable to or exceeding the ones obtainable by the current state-of-the-art solutions in the field while offering higher throughput, scalability and processing speed. Availability and implementation: Source code freely available for download at https://bitbucket.org/iAnalytica/chemdistillerpython. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ivan Laponogov, Noureddin Sadawi, Dieter Galea, Reza Mirnezami, Kirill A. Veselkov |
Bioinform. | 3 |