Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roshanak Mohammadivojdan

dblp:222/0577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › hardware obfuscation › logic obfuscation
logic locking
1.222023
HLock+: A Robust and Low-Overhead Logic Locking at the High-Level Language · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language · DAC 2021
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.722023
HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language · DAC 2021
HLock+: A Robust and Low-Overhead Logic Locking at the High-Level Language · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Hardware security and side channels › hardware obfuscation › logic obfuscation › logic locking
SAT-resistant logic locking
0.712023
HLock+: A Robust and Low-Overhead Logic Locking at the High-Level Language · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Hardware security and side channels
intellectual property protection
0.512021
HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language · DAC 2021
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
security-aware high-level synthesis
0.512021
HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language · DAC 2021
Hardware security and side channels › integrated circuit security
integrated circuit supply chain security
0.112021
HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language · DAC 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal analysis · 2.3point function locking · 1.3optimization algorithm · 1.3machine learning-based attack · 1.0SAT attack · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 HLock+: A Robust and Low-Overhead Logic Locking at the High-Level Language
abstract
With the emergence of the horizontal business model in the semiconductor industry, numerous hardware security concerns have been emerged, including intellectual property (IP) theft, malicious functionality insertion, and IC overproduction. To combat these threats, logic locking has been introduced as one of the most prominent countermeasures, and advances in logic locking have led the most recent techniques toward higher levels of abstractions, i.e., register transfer language (RTL) or high-level languages (C/C++). In this article, we propose HLock+, a robust logic locking framework at the high-level design language. HLock+ consists of two main parts to achieve multiple goals: 1) Locking in HLock+ is based on a formal analysis over design specifications, assets, and critical operations to determine locking points in the design to provide the best solution in terms of desired attack resiliency (e.g., SAT attacks), and locking key size and 2) we integrate the formal analysis with a point function locking technique, in which the locking candidates have been chosen by an optimization algorithm helping us to boost the efficiency of the approach with the given area, power, and performance constraints. Furthermore, the proposed framework ensures a dynamic/automatic locking solution based on a set of specifications, and it is well suited for large-scale designs. Apart from having lesser development/verification efforts, HLock+ at high-level language will be followed by high-level synthesis (HLS) and RTL synthesis, which provides superior uniform distribution and optimum output corruptibility. We show that HLock+ provides potent robustness against de-obfuscation attacks, e.g., SAT and machine-learning-based attacks, while the overhead is kept low.
Md Rafid Muttaki, Roshanak Mohammadivojdan, Hadi Mardani Kamali, Mark Tehranipoor, Farimah Farahmandi
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2021 HLock: Locking IPs at the High-Level Language
abstract
The introduction of the horizontal business model for the semiconductor industry has introduced trust issues for the integrated circuit supply chain. The most common vulnerabilities related to intellectual properties can be caused by untrusted third-party vendors and malicious foundries. Various techniques have been proposed to lock the design at the gate-level or RTL before sending it to the untrusted foundry for fabrication. However, such techniques have been proven to be easily broken using SAT attacks and machine learning-based attacks. In this paper, we propose HLock, a framework for ensuring hardware protection in the form of locking at the high-level description of the design. Our approach includes a formal analysis of design specifications, assets, and critical operations to determine points in which locking keys are inserted. The locked design is then synthesized using high-level synthesis, which has become an integral part of modern IP design due to its advantages on lesser development and verification efforts. The locking at the higher abstraction with the combination of multiple syntheses shows that HLock delivers superior performance considering attack resiliency (i.e., SAT attack, removal attacks, machine learning-based attacks) and overheads compared to conventional locking techniques. Additionally, HLock provides a dynamic/automatic locking solution for any high-level abstraction design based on performance constraints, attack resiliency, power, and area overheads as well as locking key size, and it is well suited for large-scale designs.
Md Rafid Muttaki, Roshanak Mohammadivojdan, Mark Tehranipoor, Farimah Farahmandi
DAC2