Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yannick Ponte

dblp:222/1194 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312018
IRevalOO: An Object Oriented Framework for Retrieval Evaluation · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection evaluation
0.312018
IRevalOO: An Object Oriented Framework for Retrieval Evaluation · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation
retrieval effectiveness
0.112018
IRevalOO: An Object Oriented Framework for Retrieval Evaluation · SIGIR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object-oriented design · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 IRevalOO: An Object Oriented Framework for Retrieval Evaluation
abstract
We propose IRevalOO, a flexible Object Oriented framework that (i) can be used as-is as a replacement of the widely adopted trec\_eval software, and (ii) can be easily extended (or "instantiated'', in framework terminology) to implement different scenarios of test collection based retrieval evaluation. Instances of IRevalOO can provide a usable and convenient alternative to the state-of-the-art software commonly used by different initiatives (TREC, NTCIR, CLEF, FIRE, etc.). Also, those instances can be easily adapted to satisfy future customization needs of researchers, as: implementing and experimenting with new metrics, even based on new notions of relevance; using different formats for system output and "qrels''; and in general visualizing, comparing, and managing retrieval evaluation results.
Kevin Roitero, Eddy Maddalena, Yannick Ponte, Stefano Mizzaro
SIGIR3