Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Igal Shprincis

dblp:222/1224 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › associative retrieval
cluster hypothesis
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval
focused retrieval
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation › relevance judgment
graded relevance
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cluster hypothesis tests · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments
abstract
The cluster hypothesis is a fundamental concept in ad hoc retrieval. Heretofore, cluster hypothesis tests were applied to documents using binary relevance judgments. We present novel tests that utilize graded and focused relevance judgments; the latter are markups of relevant text in relevant documents. Empirical exploration reveals that the cluster hypothesis holds not only for documents, but also for passages, as measured by the proposed tests. Furthermore, the hypothesis holds to a higher extent for highly relevant documents and for those that contain a high fraction of relevant text.
Eilon Sheetrit, Anna Shtok, Oren Kurland, Igal Shprincis
SIGIR4