Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Igal Shprincis
dblp:222/1224
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › associative retrieval
cluster hypothesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval
focused retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › relevance judgment
graded relevance |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cluster hypothesis tests · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance JudgmentsabstractThe cluster hypothesis is a fundamental concept in ad hoc retrieval. Heretofore, cluster hypothesis tests were applied to documents using binary relevance judgments. We present novel tests that utilize graded and focused relevance judgments; the latter are markups of relevant text in relevant documents. Empirical exploration reveals that the cluster hypothesis holds not only for documents, but also for passages, as measured by the proposed tests. Furthermore, the hypothesis holds to a higher extent for highly relevant documents and for those that contain a high fraction of relevant text. Eilon Sheetrit, Anna Shtok, Oren Kurland, Igal Shprincis |
SIGIR | 4 |