Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eilon Sheetrit

dblp:222/1246 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5732-1890ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › associative retrieval
cluster hypothesis
0.722018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Utilizing Inter-Passage Similarities for Focused Retrieval · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval
focused retrieval
0.722018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Utilizing Inter-Passage Similarities for Focused Retrieval · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval
0.722018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Utilizing Inter-Passage Similarities for Focused Retrieval · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.722018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Utilizing Inter-Passage Similarities for Focused Retrieval · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation › relevance judgment
graded relevance
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment
0.312018
Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments · SIGIR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cluster hypothesis tests · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Product Query Recommendation for Enriching Suggested Q&As
abstract
To help customers who are still in the exploration phase, Web search engines and e-commerce websites often provide relevant Q&As in widgets, such as ‘People Also Ask’ and ‘Customers Also Ask Alexa’, with additional information. In this work, we propose to enrich this customer experience by rendering related products under each Q&A based on an automated online query recommendation. We define what are the tenets for high-quality query recommendations and explain why this challenge is different from the existing query re-writing, query expansion and keyphrase generation methods. We describe a data collection method which uses customer co-click information on a proprietary website in order to successfully guide our model into generating query recommendations that satisfy all tenets. Offline and online evaluation results demonstrate that our proposed approach generates superior query recommendations and brings much more customer engagement over strong baselines.
Eilon Sheetrit, Omar Alonso, Avihai Mejer
CHIIR2
2020 A passage-based approach to learning to rank documents
Eilon Sheetrit, Anna Shtok, Oren Kurland
Inf. Retr. J.1
2019 Cluster-Based Focused Retrieval
abstract
The focused retrieval task is to rank documents' passages by their presumed relevance to a query. Inspired by work on cluster-based document retrieval, we present a novel cluster-based focused retrieval method. The method is based on ranking clusters of similar passages using a learning-to-rank approach and transforming the cluster ranking to passage ranking. Empirical evaluation demonstrates the clear merits of the method.
Eilon Sheetrit, Oren Kurland
CIKM1
2018 Utilizing Inter-Passage Similarities for Focused Retrieval
abstract
Our main goal is studying the merits of using inter-passage similarities for the task of focused retrieval; i.e., ranking passages in documents by their relevance to an information need expressed by a query. As an initial research direction we study the cluster hypothesis for passage (focused) retrieval. We propose a novel suite of cluster hypothesis tests that employ inter-passage similarities and demonstrate that the cluster hypothesis holds for passages. In addition, we present several future directions we intend to pursue.
Eilon Sheetrit
SIGIR1
2018 Testing the Cluster Hypothesis with Focused and Graded Relevance Judgments
abstract
The cluster hypothesis is a fundamental concept in ad hoc retrieval. Heretofore, cluster hypothesis tests were applied to documents using binary relevance judgments. We present novel tests that utilize graded and focused relevance judgments; the latter are markups of relevant text in relevant documents. Empirical exploration reveals that the cluster hypothesis holds not only for documents, but also for passages, as measured by the proposed tests. Furthermore, the hypothesis holds to a higher extent for highly relevant documents and for those that contain a high fraction of relevant text.
Eilon Sheetrit, Anna Shtok, Oren Kurland, Igal Shprincis
SIGIR1