Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Damianos Tranos
dblp:222/1726
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 93% Learning theory · 7% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
directed exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
regret lower bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 0.3markov decision process · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Exploration in Structured Reinforcement LearningabstractWe address reinforcement learning problems with finite state and action spaces where the underlying MDP has some known structure that could be potentially exploited to minimize the exploration rates of suboptimal (state, action) pairs. For any arbitrary structure, we derive problem-specific regret lower bounds satisfied by any learning algorithm. These lower bounds are made explicit for unstructured MDPs and for those whose transition probabilities and average reward functions are Lipschitz continuous w.r.t. the state and action. For Lipschitz MDPs, the bounds are shown not to scale with the sizes S and A of the state and action spaces, i.e., they are smaller than c log T where T is the time horizon and the constant c only depends on the Lipschitz structure, the span of the bias function, and the minimal action sub-optimality gap. This contrasts with unstructured MDPs where the regret lower bound typically scales as SA log T. We devise DEL (Directed Exploration Learning), an algorithm that matches our regret lower bounds. We further simplify the algorithm for Lipschitz MDPs, and show that the simplified version is still able to efficiently exploit the structure. Jungseul Ok, Alexandre Proutière, Damianos Tranos |
NeurIPS | 3 |