Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Damianos Tranos

dblp:222/1726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 93% Learning theory · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
directed exploration
0.312018
Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.312018
Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.312018
Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
regret lower bounds
0.112018
Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 0.3markov decision process · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We address reinforcement learning problems with finite state and action spaces where the underlying MDP has some known structure that could be potentially exploited to minimize the exploration rates of suboptimal (state, action) pairs. For any arbitrary structure, we derive problem-specific regret lower bounds satisfied by any learning algorithm. These lower bounds are made explicit for unstructured MDPs and for those whose transition probabilities and average reward functions are Lipschitz continuous w.r.t. the state and action. For Lipschitz MDPs, the bounds are shown not to scale with the sizes S and A of the state and action spaces, i.e., they are smaller than c log T where T is the time horizon and the constant c only depends on the Lipschitz structure, the span of the bias function, and the minimal action sub-optimality gap. This contrasts with unstructured MDPs where the regret lower bound typically scales as SA log T. We devise DEL (Directed Exploration Learning), an algorithm that matches our regret lower bounds. We further simplify the algorithm for Lipschitz MDPs, and show that the simplified version is still able to efficiently exploit the structure.
Jungseul Ok, Alexandre Proutière, Damianos Tranos
NeurIPS3