Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heli Ben-Hamu
dblp:222/1739
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Generative modeling · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Reinforcement learning · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 77% Visual content generation and editing · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings · ICML 2023 Flow Matching for Generative Modeling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerated Sampling from Masked Diffusion Models via Entropy Bounded Unmasking · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerated Sampling from Masked Diffusion Models via Entropy Bounded Unmasking · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
controlled generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Provably Powerful Graph Networks · NeurIPS 2019 Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
inverse problem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifolds · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
normalizing flows on manifolds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifolds · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
invariant network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surface Networks via General Covers · ICCV 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis › shape recognition
shape classification and retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surface Networks via General Covers · ICCV 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Provably Powerful Graph Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Visual content generation and editing
3d shape generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-chart generative surface modeling · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-chart generative surface modeling · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
symmetry-aware representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Design · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
entropy bounded unmasking · 0.9adaptive sampler · 0.9gradient projection · 0.8differentiation through flow · 0.8simulation-free training · 0.7optimal transport coupling · 0.7flow matching · 0.7continuous normalizing flow · 0.7group equivariance · 0.6frame averaging · 0.6weisfeiler-lehman test · 0.4spherical parameterization · 0.4invariant and equivariant networks · 0.4covering map · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4multi-chart representation · 0.3generative adversarial network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerated Sampling from Masked Diffusion Models via Entropy Bounded UnmaskingabstractRecent masked diffusion models (MDMs) have shown competitive performance compared to autoregressive models (ARMs) for language modeling. While most literature has focused on performance enhancing sampling procedures, efficient sampling from MDMs has been scarcely explored. We make the observation that often a given sequence of partially masked tokens determines the values of multiple unknown tokens deterministically, meaning that a single prediction of a masked model holds additional information unused by standard sampling procedures.
Based on this observation, we introduce *EB-Sampler*, a simple drop-in replacement for existing samplers, utilizing an **E**ntropy **B**ounded unmasking procedure that dynamically unmasks multiple tokens in one function evaluation with predefined approximate error tolerance. We formulate the EB-Sampler as part of a broad family of adaptive samplers for which we provide an error analysis that motivates our algorithmic choices. EB-Sampler accelerates sampling from current state of the art MDMs by roughly 2-3x on standard coding and math reasoning benchmarks without loss in performance. We also validate the same procedure works well on smaller reasoning tasks including maze navigation and sudoku, tasks ARMs often struggle with. Heli Ben-Hamu, Itai Gat, Daniel Severo 0001, Niklas Nolte, Brian Karrer |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled GenerationabstractTaming the generation outcome of state of the art Diffusion and Flow-Matching (FM) models without having to re-train a task-specific model unlocks a powerful tool for solving inverse problems, conditional generation, and controlled generation in general. In this work we introduce *D-Flow*, a simple framework for controlling the generation process by differentiating through the flow, optimizing for the source (noise) point. We motivate this framework by our key observation stating that for Diffusion/FM models trained with Gaussian probability paths, differentiating through the generation process projects gradient on the data manifold, implicitly injecting the prior into the optimization process. We validate our framework on linear and non-linear controlled generation problems including: image and audio inverse problems and conditional molecule generation reaching state of the art performance across all. Heli Ben-Hamu, Omri Puny, Itai Gat, Brian Karrer, Uriel Singer, Yaron Lipman |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Flow Matching for Generative Modeling
Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, Matt Le 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch CouplingsabstractSimulation-free methods for training continuous-time generative models construct probability paths that go between noise distributions and individual data samples. Recent works, such as Flow Matching, derived paths that are optimal for each data sample. However, these algorithms rely on independent data and noise samples, and do not exploit underlying structure in the data distribution for constructing probability paths. We propose Multisample Flow Matching, a more general framework that uses non-trivial couplings between data and noise samples while satisfying the correct marginal constraints. At small overhead costs, this generalization allows us to (i) reduce gradient variance during training, (ii) obtain straighter flows for the learned vector field, which allows us to generate high-quality samples using fewer function evaluations, and (iii) obtain transport maps with low cost in high dimensions, which has applications beyond generative modeling. Importantly, we do so in a completely simulation-free manner with a simple minimization objective. We show that our proposed methods improve sample consistency on downsampled ImageNet data sets, and lead to better low-cost sample generation. Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Heli Ben-Hamu, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Brandon Amos, Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Design
Omri Puny, Matan Atzmon, Edward J. Smith, Ishan Misra, Aditya Grover, Heli Ben-Hamu, Yaron Lipman |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2022 | Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on ManifoldsabstractContinuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs) are a class of generative models that transform a prior distribution to a model distribution by solving an ordinary differential equation (ODE). We propose to train CNFs on manifolds by minimizing probability path divergence (PPD), a novel family of divergences between the probability density path generated by the CNF and a target probability density path. PPD is formulated using a logarithmic mass conservation formula which is a linear first order partial differential equation relating the log target probabilities and the CNF’s defining vector field. PPD has several key benefits over existing methods: it sidesteps the need to solve an ODE per iteration, readily applies to manifold data, scales to high dimensions, and is compatible with a large family of target paths interpolating pure noise and data in finite time. Theoretically, PPD is shown to bound classical probability divergences. Empirically, we show that CNFs learned by minimizing PPD achieve state-of-the-art results in likelihoods and sample quality on existing low-dimensional manifold benchmarks, and is the first example of a generative model to scale to moderately high dimensional manifolds. Heli Ben-Hamu, Samuel Cohen, Joey Bose, Brandon Amos, Maximilian Nickel, Aditya Grover, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yaron Lipman |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Surface Networks via General CoversabstractDeveloping deep learning techniques for geometric data is an active and fruitful research area. This paper tackles the problem of sphere-type surface learning by developing a novel surface-to-image representation. Using this representation we are able to quickly adapt successful CNN models to the surface setting. The surface-image representation is based on a covering map from the image domain to the surface. Namely, the map wraps around the surface several times, making sure that every part of the surface is well represented in the image. Differently from previous surface-to-image representations, we provide a low distortion coverage of all surface parts in a single image. Specifically, for the use case of learning spherical signals, our representation provides a low distortion alternative to several popular spherical parameterizations used in deep learning. We have used the surface-to-image representation to apply standard CNN architectures to 3D models including spherical signals. We show that our method achieves state of the art or comparable results on the tasks of shape retrieval, shape classification and semantic shape segmentation. Niv Haim, Nimrod Segol, Heli Ben-Hamu, Haggai Maron, Yaron Lipman |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2019 | Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks
Haggai Maron, Heli Ben-Hamu, Nadav Shamir, Yaron Lipman |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2019 | Provably Powerful Graph NetworksabstractRecently, the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) graph isomorphism test was used to measure the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNN). It was shown that the popular message passing GNN cannot distinguish between graphs that are indistinguishable by the $1$-WL test \citep{morris2019,xu2019}. Unfortunately, many simple instances of graphs are indistinguishable by the $1$-WL test. In search for more expressive graph learning models we build upon the recent $k$-order invariant and equivariant graph neural networks \citep{maron2019} and present two results: First, we show that such $k$-order networks can distinguish between non-isomorphic graphs as good as the $k$-WL tests, which are provably stronger than the $1$-WL test for $k>2$. This makes these models strictly stronger than message passing models. Unfortunately, the higher expressiveness of these models comes with a computational cost of processing high order tensors. Second, setting our goal at building a provably stronger, \emph{simple} and \emph{scalable} model we show that a reduced $2$-order network containing just scaled identity operator, augmented with a single quadratic operation (matrix multiplication) has a provable $3$-WL expressive power. Differently put, we suggest a simple model that interleaves applications of standard Multilayer-Perceptron (MLP) applied to the feature dimension and matrix multiplication. We validate this model by presenting state of the art results on popular graph classification and regression tasks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first practical invariant/equivariant model with guaranteed $3$-WL expressiveness, strictly stronger than message passing models. Haggai Maron, Heli Ben-Hamu, Hadar Serviansky, Yaron Lipman |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Multi-chart generative surface modelingabstractThis paper introduces a 3D shape generative model based on deep neural networks. A new image-like ( i.e. , tensor) data representation for genus-zero 3D shapes is devised. It is based on the observation that complicated shapes can be well represented by multiple parameterizations (charts), each focusing on a different part of the shape. The new tensor data representation is used as input to Generative Adversarial Networks for the task of 3D shape generation. The 3D shape tensor representation is based on a multi-chart structure that enjoys a shape covering property and scale-translation rigidity. Scale-translation rigidity facilitates high quality 3D shape learning and guarantees unique reconstruction. The multi-chart structure uses as input a dataset of 3D shapes (with arbitrary connectivity) and a sparse correspondence between them. The output of our algorithm is a generative model that learns the shape distribution and is able to generate novel shapes, interpolate shapes, and explore the generated shape space. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated for the task of anatomic shape generation including human body and bone (teeth) shape generation. Heli Ben-Hamu, Haggai Maron, Itay Kezurer, Gal Avineri, Yaron Lipman |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |