Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clemens Meyer

dblp:222/1978 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 67% Generative modeling · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
conditional variational autoencoder
0.312018
A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
probabilistic segmentation
0.312018
A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.312018
A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision-making
0.112018
A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

u-net · 0.7generative segmentation · 0.7conditional variational autoencoder · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images
abstract
Many real-world vision problems suffer from inherent ambiguities. In clinical applications for example, it might not be clear from a CT scan alone which particular region is cancer tissue. Therefore a group of graders typically produces a set of diverse but plausible segmentations. We consider the task of learning a distribution over segmentations given an input. To this end we propose a generative segmentation model based on a combination of a U-Net with a conditional variational autoencoder that is capable of efficiently producing an unlimited number of plausible hypotheses. We show on a lung abnormalities segmentation task and on a Cityscapes segmentation task that our model reproduces the possible segmentation variants as well as the frequencies with which they occur, doing so significantly better than published approaches. These models could have a high impact in real-world applications, such as being used as clinical decision-making algorithms accounting for multiple plausible semantic segmentation hypotheses to provide possible diagnoses and recommend further actions to resolve the present ambiguities.
Simon Kohl, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Clemens Meyer, Jeffrey De Fauw, Joseph R. Ledsam, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Olaf Ronneberger
NeurIPS3