Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clemens Meyer
dblp:222/1978
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
conditional variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
probabilistic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision-making |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
u-net · 0.7generative segmentation · 0.7conditional variational autoencoder · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous ImagesabstractMany real-world vision problems suffer from inherent ambiguities. In clinical applications for example, it might not be clear from a CT scan alone which particular region is cancer tissue. Therefore a group of graders typically produces a set of diverse but plausible segmentations. We consider the task of learning a distribution over segmentations given an input. To this end we propose a generative segmentation model based on a combination of a U-Net with a conditional variational autoencoder that is capable of efficiently producing an unlimited number of plausible hypotheses. We show on a lung abnormalities segmentation task and on a Cityscapes segmentation task that our model reproduces the possible segmentation variants as well as the frequencies with which they occur, doing so significantly better than published approaches. These models could have a high impact in real-world applications, such as being used as clinical decision-making algorithms accounting for multiple plausible semantic segmentation hypotheses to provide possible diagnoses and recommend further actions to resolve the present ambiguities. Simon Kohl, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Clemens Meyer, Jeffrey De Fauw, Joseph R. Ledsam, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Olaf Ronneberger |
NeurIPS | 3 |