Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aleksandra Kalinowska

dblp:222/2002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Robot manipulation · 23%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 74% Human-robot interaction · 15% Accessibility and assistive technology · 11%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.512021
Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.512021
Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
data-driven control
0.412019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.412019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.412019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019
Wearable and physiological sensing
gait analysis
0.412019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019
Wearable and physiological sensing › gait analysis
gait phase detection
0.412019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019
Human-robot interaction › educational robotics
robot teaching
0.112021
Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do · ICRA 2021
Accessibility and assistive technology › locomotion assistance
gait assistance
0.112019
Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

negative demonstrations · 1.0learning from demonstration · 1.0ergodic metric · 1.0hybrid system identification · 0.8data-driven dynamics identification · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Situated Communication in Multi-Step Interactions: Time is a Key Pressure in Communication Emergence
Aleksandra Kalinowska, Elnaz Davoodi, Kory W. Mathewson, Todd D. Murphey, Patrick M. Pilarski
CogSci1
2021 Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do
abstract
With growing access to versatile robotics, it is beneficial for end users to be able to teach robots tasks without needing to code a control policy. One possibility is to teach the robot through successful task executions. However, near-optimal demonstrations of a task can be difficult to provide and even successful demonstrations can fail to capture task aspects key to robust skill replication. Here, we propose a learning from demonstration (LfD) approach that enables learning of robust task definitions without the need for near-optimal demonstrations. We present a novel algorithmic framework for learning tasks based on the ergodic metric—a measure of information content in motion. Moreover, we make use of negative demonstrations—demonstrations of what not to do—and show that they can help compensate for imperfect demonstrations, reduce the number of demonstrations needed, and highlight crucial task elements improving robot performance. In a proof-of-concept example of cart-pole inversion, we show that negative demonstrations alone can be sufficient to successfully learn and recreate a skill. Through a human subject study with 24 participants, we show that consistently more information about a task can be captured from combined positive and negative (posneg) demonstrations than from the same amount of just positive demonstrations. Finally, we demonstrate our learning approach on simulated tasks of target reaching and table cleaning with a 7-DoF Franka arm. Our results point towards a future with robust, data-efficient LfD for novice users.
Aleksandra Kalinowska, Ahalya Prabhakar, Kathleen Fitzsimons, Todd D. Murphey
ICRA1
2019 Data-Driven Gait Segmentation for Walking Assistance in a Lower-Limb Assistive Device
abstract
Hybrid systems, such as bipedal walkers, are challenging to control because of discontinuities in their nonlinear dynamics. Little can be predicted about the systems' evolution without modeling the guard conditions that govern transitions between hybrid modes, so even systems with reliable state sensing can be difficult to control. We propose an algorithm that allows for determining the hybrid mode of a system in real-time using data-driven analysis. The algorithm is used with data-driven dynamics identification to enable model predictive control based entirely on data. Two examples-a simulated hopper and experimental data from a bipedal walker-are used. In the context of the first example, we are able to closely approximate the dynamics of a hybrid SLIP model and then successfully use them for control in simulation. In the second example, we demonstrate gait partitioning of human walking data, accurately differentiating between stance and swing, as well as selected subphases of swing. We identify contact events, such as heel strike and toe-off, without a contact sensor using only kinematics data from the knee and hip joints, which could be particularly useful in providing online assistance during walking. Our algorithm does not assume a predefined gait structure or gait phase transitions, lending itself to segmentation of both healthy and pathological gaits. With this flexibility, impairment-specific rehabilitation strategies or assistance could be designed.
Aleksandra Kalinowska, Thomas A. Berrueta, Adam Zoss, Todd D. Murphey
ICRA1