EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Bompaire
dblp:222/2161
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 48% Data mining · 37% Recommender systems · 16% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 59% Graph learning · 18% Learning theory · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 78% Computational science and engineering · 22% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Sparse and low-rank multivariate Hawkes processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 tick: a Python Library for Statistical Learning, with an emphasis on Hawkes Processes and Time-Dependent Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
maximum inner product search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reward Optimizing Recommendation using Deep Learning and Fast Maximum Inner Product Search · KDD 2022 |
Information retrieval
similarity search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reward Optimizing Recommendation using Deep Learning and Fast Maximum Inner Product Search · KDD 2022 |
Computational finance and economics
online advertising |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User Interactions · KDD 2021 |
Computational finance and economics › online advertising
real-time bidding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User Interactions · KDD 2021 |
Data mining
causal inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User Interactions · KDD 2021 |
Data mining › causal inference
causal modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User Interactions · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
matrix regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse and low-rank multivariate Hawkes processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process › hawkes process
multivariate hawkes process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse and low-rank multivariate Hawkes processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph inference
network structure inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sparse and low-rank multivariate Hawkes processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
hawkes process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | tick: a Python Library for Statistical Learning, with an emphasis on Hawkes Processes and Time-Dependent Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
statistical software |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | tick: a Python Library for Statistical Learning, with an emphasis on Hawkes Processes and Time-Dependent Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Information retrieval
user interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User Interactions · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value estimation · 1.0causal models · 1.0simulation · 0.9off-policy learning · 0.9counterfactual learning · 0.9time-dependent models · 0.6statistical learning · 0.6maximum inner product search · 0.6deep learning · 0.6trace norm penalization · 0.4matrix martingale concentration inequality · 0.4least squares loss · 0.4l1 penalization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Reward Optimizing Recommendation using Deep Learning and Fast Maximum Inner Product SearchabstractHow can we build and optimize a recommender system that must rapidly fill slates (i.e. banners) of personalized recommendations? The combination of deep learning stacks with fast maximum inner product search (MIPS) algorithms have shown it is possible to deploy flexible models in production that can rapidly deliver personalized recommendations to users. Albeit promising, this methodology is unfortunately not sufficient to build a recommender system which maximizes the reward, e.g. the probability of click. Usually instead a proxy loss is optimized and A/B testing is used to test if the system actually improved performance. This tutorial takes participants through the necessary steps to model the reward and directly optimize the reward of recommendation engines built upon fast search algorithms to produce high-performance reward-optimizing recommender systems. Imad Aouali, Amine Benhalloum, Martin Bompaire, Achraf Ait Sidi Hammou, Benjamin Heymann, David Rohde, Otmane Sakhi, Flavian Vasile, Maxime Vono |
KDD | 3 |
| 2021 | Causal Models for Real Time Bidding with Repeated User InteractionsabstractA large portion of online advertising displays are sold through an auction mechanism called Real Time Bidding (RTB). Each auction corresponds to a display opportunity, for which the competing advertisers need to precisely estimate the economical value in order to bid accordingly. This estimate is typically taken as the advertiser's payoff for the target event -- such as a purchase on the merchant website attributed to this display -- times this event estimated probability. However, this greedy approach is too naive when several displays are shown to the same user. The purpose of the present paper is to discuss how such an estimation should be made when a user has already been shown one or more displays. Intuitively, while a user is more likely to make a purchase if the number of displays increases, the marginal effect of each display is expected to be decreasing. In this work, we first frame this bidding problem with repeated user interactions by using causal models to value each display individually. Then, based on this approach, we introduce a simple rule to improve the value estimate. This change shows both interesting qualitative properties that follow our previous intuition as well as quantitative improvements on a public data set and online in a production environment. Martin Bompaire, Alexandre Gilotte, Benjamin Heymann |
KDD | 1 |
| 2020 | Joint Policy-Value Learning for RecommendationabstractConventional approaches to recommendation often do not explicitly take into account information on previously shown recommendations and their recorded responses. One reason is that, since we do not know the outcome of actions the system did not take, learning directly from such logs is not a straightforward task. Several methods for off-policy or counterfactual learning have been proposed in recent years, but their efficacy for the recommendation task remains understudied. Due to the limitations of offline datasets and the lack of access of most academic researchers to online experiments, this is a non-trivial task. Simulation environments can provide a reproducible solution to this problem. Olivier Jeunen, David Rohde, Flavian Vasile, Martin Bompaire |
KDD | 4 |
| 2020 | Sparse and low-rank multivariate Hawkes processesabstractWe consider the problem of unveiling the implicit network structure of node interactions (such as user interactions in a social network), based only on high-frequency timestamps. Our inference is based on the minimization of the least-squares loss associated with a multivariate Hawkes model, penalized by $\ell_1$ and trace norm of the interaction tensor. We provide a first theoretical analysis for this problem, that includes sparsity and low-rank inducing penalizations. This result involves a new data-driven concentration inequality for matrix martingales in continuous time with observable variance, which is a result of independent interest and a broad range of possible applications since it extends to matrix martingales former results restricted to the scalar case. A consequence of our analysis is the construction of sharply tuned $\ell_1$ and trace-norm penalizations, that leads to a data-driven scaling of the variability of information available for each users. Numerical experiments illustrate the significant improvements achieved by the use of such data-driven penalizations. Emmanuel Bacry, Martin Bompaire, Stéphane Gaïffas, Jean-François Muzy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2017 | tick: a Python Library for Statistical Learning, with an emphasis on Hawkes Processes and Time-Dependent Models
Emmanuel Bacry, Martin Bompaire, Philip Deegan, Stéphane Gaïffas, Søren Poulsen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |