Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eduard Talamàs

dblp:222/2250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9128-0532ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 77% Algorithms and data structures · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
robust mechanism design
0.912025
Robust Market Interventions · EC 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.312025
Robust Market Interventions · EC 2025
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods
0.312025
Robust Market Interventions · EC 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical problem solving
0.212024
Artificial Intelligence in the Knowledge Economy · EC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

equilibrium analysis · 1.5spectral methods · 0.9convex optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robust Market Interventions
abstract
We study when interventions can robustly increase market surplus despite imprecise information about economic primitives, in a setting with many strategic firms possessing market power. The key sufficient condition, recoverable structure, requires large-scale product complementarities. The analysis works by decomposing the incidence of interventions in terms of principal components of a Slutsky matrix. Under recoverable structure, a noisy signal of this matrix reveals enough about these principal components to design robust interventions. Our results demonstrate the utility of spectral methods for analyzing imperfectly observed strategic interactions with many agents.
Andrea Galeotti, Benjamin Golub, Sanjeev Goyal, Omer Tamuz, Eduard Talamàs
EC5
2024 Artificial Intelligence in the Knowledge Economy
abstract
This paper provides a new framework for studying the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the organization of knowledge work. We incorporate AI into an economy where humans endogenously form hierarchical firms: Less knowledgeable agents become "workers" solving routine problems, while more knowledgeable agents become "solvers" handling exceptions. We model AI as an algorithm that uses compute to mimic humans. We compare the equilibrium before and after AI's introduction, distinguishing between "basic" AI (with knowledge equivalent to pre-AI workers) and "advanced" AI (with knowledge equivalent to pre-AI solvers). We show that basic AI increases the knowledge content of human work, leading to smaller, less productive, and less decentralized firms. In contrast, advanced AI decreases the knowledge content of human work, resulting in larger, more productive, and more decentralized firms. In any case, the most knowledgeable humans benefit from AI, while the least knowledgeable benefit only when AI is sufficiently advanced. We discuss how these effects depend on AI's autonomy and the availability of compute. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05481
Enrique Ide, Eduard Talamàs
EC2