Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aaron Maschinot

dblp:222/2591 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5614-7843ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Generative modeling · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% 3D vision · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visual content generation and editing · 84% Computational photography and imaging · 16%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › masked generative modeling
masked generative transformer
0.712023
Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked token prediction
0.712023
Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.712023
Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers · ICML 2023
Visual content generation and editing
image editing
0.622023
Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019
Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
image extrapolation
0.412019
Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d face reconstruction
0.312018
Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model Regression · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d face modeling
3d morphable model
0.312018
Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model Regression · CVPR 2018
Computational photography and imaging › panoramic imaging
panorama generation
0.112019
Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension · ICCV 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.3masked modeling · 1.3large language model embedding · 1.3semantic conditioning · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.8contrastive loss · 0.4unsupervised learning · 0.3regression network · 0.3differentiable rendering · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers
abstract
We present Muse, a text-to-image Transformermodel that achieves state-of-the-art image genera-tion performance while being significantly moreefficient than diffusion or autoregressive models.Muse is trained on a masked modeling task indiscrete token space: given the text embeddingextracted from a pre-trained large language model(LLM), Muse learns to predict randomly maskedimage tokens. Compared to pixel-space diffusionmodels, such as Imagen and DALL-E 2, Muse issignificantly more efficient due to the use of dis-crete tokens and requires fewer sampling itera-tions; compared to autoregressive models such asParti, Muse is more efficient due to the use of par-allel decoding. The use of a pre-trained LLM en-ables fine-grained language understanding, whichtranslates to high-fidelity image generation andthe understanding of visual concepts such as ob-jects, their spatial relationships, pose, cardinalityetc. Our 900M parameter model achieves a newSOTA on CC3M, with an FID score of 6.06. TheMuse 3B parameter model achieves an FID of7.88 on zero-shot COCO evaluation, along with aCLIP score of 0.32. Muse also directly enables anumber of image editing applications without theneed to fine-tune or invert the model: inpainting,outpainting, and mask-free editing. More resultsand videos demonstrating editing are available at https://muse-icml.github.io/
Huiwen Chang, Han Zhang 0010, Jarred Barber, Aaron Maschinot, José Lezama, Lu Jiang 0004, Ming-Hsuan Yang 0001, Kevin Murphy 0002, William T. Freeman, Michael Rubinstein, Yuanzhen Li, Dilip Krishnan
ICML4
2020 Supervised Contrastive Learning
abstract
Contrastive learning applied to self-supervised representation learning has seen a resurgence in recent years, leading to state of the art performance in the unsupervised training of deep image models. Modern batch contrastive approaches subsume or significantly outperform traditional contrastive losses such as triplet, max-margin and the N-pairs loss. In this work, we extend the self-supervised batch contrastive approach to the fully-supervised setting, allowing us to effectively leverage label information. Clusters of points belonging to the same class are pulled together in embedding space, while simultaneously pushing apart clusters of samples from different classes. We analyze two possible versions of the supervised contrastive (SupCon) loss, identifying the best-performing formulation of the loss. On ResNet-200, we achieve top-1 accuracy of 81.4% on the ImageNet dataset, which is 0.8% above the best number reported for this architecture. We show consistent outperformance over cross-entropy on other datasets and two ResNet variants. The loss shows benefits for robustness to natural corruptions, and is more stable to hyperparameter settings such as optimizers and data augmentations. In reduced data settings, it outperforms cross-entropy significantly. Our loss function is simple to implement and reference TensorFlow code is released at https://t.ly/supcon.
Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang 0050, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu 0001, Dilip Krishnan
NeurIPS7
2019 Boundless: Generative Adversarial Networks for Image Extension
abstract
Image extension models have broad applications in image editing, computational photography and computer graphics. While image inpainting has been extensively studied in the literature, it is challenging to directly apply the state-of-the-art inpainting methods to image extension as they tend to generate blurry or repetitive pixels with inconsistent semantics. We introduce semantic conditioning to the discriminator of a generative adversarial network (GAN), and achieve strong results on image extension with coherent semantics and visually pleasing colors and textures. We also show promising results in extreme extensions, such as panorama generation.
Dilip Krishnan, Piotr Teterwak, Aaron Sarna, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu 0001, David Belanger 0002, William T. Freeman
ICCV4
2018 Unsupervised Training for 3D Morphable Model Regression
abstract
We present a method for training a regression network from image pixels to 3D morphable model coordinates using only unlabeled photographs. The training loss is based on features from a facial recognition network, computed on-the-fly by rendering the predicted faces with a differentiable renderer. To make training from features feasible and avoid network fooling effects, we introduce three objectives: a batch distribution loss that encourages the output distribution to match the distribution of the morphable model, a loopback loss that ensures the network can correctly reinterpret its own output, and a multi-view identity loss that compares the features of the predicted 3D face and the input photograph from multiple viewing angles. We train a regression network using these objectives, a set of unlabeled photographs, and the morphable model itself, and demonstrate state-of-the-art results.
Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Aaron Maschinot, Aaron Sarna, Daniel Vlasic, William T. Freeman
CVPR3