Modern systems that deal with inference in texts need automatized methods to extract meaning representations (MRs) from texts at scale. Open Information Extraction (IE) is a prominent way of extracting all potential relations from a given text in a comprehensive manner. Previous work in this area has mainly focused on the extraction of isolated relational tuples. Ignoring the cohesive nature of texts where important contextual information is spread across clauses or sentences, state-of-the-art Open IE approaches are thus prone to generating a loose arrangement of tuples that lack the expressiveness needed to infer the true meaning of complex assertions. To overcome this limitation, we present a method that allows existing Open IE systems to enrich their output with additional meta information. By leveraging the semantic hierarchy of minimal propositions generated by the discourse-aware Text Simplification (TS) approach presented in Niklaus et al. (2019), we propose a mechanism to extract semantically typed relational tuples from complex source sentences. Based on this novel type of output, we introduce a lightweight semantic representation for Open IE in the form of normalized and context-preserving relational tuples. It extends the shallow semantic representation of state-of-the-art approaches in the form of predicate-argument structures by capturing intra-sentential rhetorical structures and hierarchical relationships between the relational tuples. In that way, the semantic context of the extracted tuples is preserved, resulting in more informative and coherent predicate-argument structures which are easier to interpret. In addition, in a comparative analysis, we show that the semantic hierarchy of minimal propositions benefits Open IE approaches in a second dimension: the canonical structure of the simplified sentences is easier to process and analyze, and thus facilitates the extraction of relational tuples, resulting in an improved precision (up to 32%) and recall (up to 30%) of the extracted relations on a large benchmark corpus.

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) bear the opportunity to analyze the argumentation quality of texts. This can be leveraged to provide students with individual and adaptive feedback in their personal learning journey. To test if individual feedback on students' argumentation will help them to write more convincing texts, we developed AL, an adaptive IT tool that provides students with feedback on the argumentation structure of a given text. We compared AL with 54 students to a proven argumentation support tool. We found students using AL wrote more convincing texts with better formal quality of argumentation compared to the ones using the traditional approach. The measured technology acceptance provided promising results to use this tool as a feedback application in different learning settings. The results suggest that learning applications based on NLP may have a beneficial use for developing better writing and reasoning for students in traditional learning settings.

We present an approach for recursively splitting and rephrasing complex English sentences into a novel semantic hierarchy of simplified sentences, with each of them presenting a more regular structure that may facilitate a wide variety of artificial intelligence tasks, such as machine translation (MT) or information extraction (IE).Using a set of hand-crafted transformation rules, input sentences are recursively transformed into a twolayered hierarchical representation in the form of core sentences and accompanying contexts that are linked via rhetorical relations.In this way, the semantic relationship of the decomposed constituents is preserved in the output, maintaining its interpretability for downstream applications.Both a thorough manual analysis and automatic evaluation across three datasets from two different domains demonstrate that the proposed syntactic simplification approach outperforms the state of the art in structural text simplification.Moreover, an extrinsic evaluation shows that when applying our framework as a preprocessing step the performance of state-of-the-art Open IE systems can be improved by up to 346% in precision and 52% in recall.To enable reproducible research, all code is provided online.

We introduce DisSim, a discourse-aware sentence splitting framework for English and German whose goal is to transform syntactically complex sentences into an intermediate representation that presents a simple and more regular structure which is easier to process for downstream semantic applications. For this purpose, we turn input sentences into a two-layered semantic hierarchy in the form of core facts and accompanying contexts, while identifying the rhetorical relations that hold between them. In that way, we preserve the coherence structure of the input and, hence, its interpretability for downstream tasks.

We present an Open Information Extraction (IE) approach that uses a two-layered transformation stage consisting of a clausal disembedding layer and a phrasal disembedding layer, together with rhetorical relation identification. In that way, we convert sentences that present a complex linguistic structure into simplified, syntactically sound sentences, from which we can extract propositions that are represented in a two-layered hierarchy in the form of core relational tuples and accompanying contextual information which are semantically linked via rhetorical relations. In a comparative evaluation, we demonstrate that our reference implementation Graphene outperforms state-of-the-art Open IE systems in the construction of correct n-ary predicate-argument structures. Moreover, we show that existing Open IE approaches can benefit from the transformation process of our framework.

We provide a detailed overview of the various approaches that were proposed to date to solve the task of Open Information Extraction. We present the major challenges that such systems face, show the evolution of the suggested approaches over time and depict the specific issues they address. In addition, we provide a critique of the commonly applied evaluation procedures for assessing the performance of Open IE systems and highlight some directions for future work.