Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Artyom Gadetsky

dblp:222/2900 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 26% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised adaptation
0.912025
Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
unsupervised fine-tuning
0.912025
Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.812024
Fine-grained Classes and How to Find Them · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
foundation model representation
0.812024
Let Go of Your Labels with Unsupervised Transfer · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning
0.712023
The Pursuit of Human Labeling: A New Perspective on Unsupervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
gumbel-max trick
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent structure discovery
0.512021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discrete latent variable model
0.412020
Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.412020
Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods
0.412020
Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction
0.412020
Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model adaptation
0.312025
Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification
0.212024
Let Go of Your Labels with Unsupervised Transfer · ICML 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.212023
The Pursuit of Human Labeling: A New Perspective on Unsupervised Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation
0.112021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient estimation
score function estimator
0.112021
Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.112020
Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

control variates · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.9modular learning · 0.8maximal margin classifier · 0.8clustering · 0.8self-supervised pretrained representation · 0.7linear classifier · 0.7score function estimator · 0.5gumbel-max trick · 0.5black-box optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Large (Vision) Language Models are Unsupervised In-Context Learners
abstract
Recent advances in large language and vision-language models have enabled zero-shot inference, allowing models to solve new tasks without task-specific training. Various adaptation techniques such as prompt engineering, In-Context Learning (ICL), and supervised fine-tuning can further enhance the model’s performance on a downstream task, but they require substantial manual effort to construct effective prompts or labeled examples. In this work, we introduce a joint inference framework for fully unsupervised adaptation, eliminating the need for manual prompt engineering and labeled examples. Unlike zero-shot inference, which makes independent predictions, the joint inference makes predictions simultaneously for all inputs in a given task. Since direct joint inference involves computationally expensive optimization, we develop efficient approximation techniques, leading to two unsupervised adaptation methods: unsupervised fine-tuning and unsupervised ICL. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods across diverse tasks and models, including language-only Llama-3.1 on natural language processing tasks, reasoning-oriented Qwen2.5-Math on grade school math problems, vision-language OpenFlamingo on vision tasks, and the API-only access GPT-4o model on massive multi-discipline tasks. Our experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over the standard zero-shot approach, including 39% absolute improvement on the challenging GSM8K math reasoning dataset. Remarkably, despite being fully unsupervised, our framework often performs on par with supervised approaches that rely on ground truth labels.
Artyom Gadetsky, Andrei Atanov, Yulun Jiang, Zhitong Gao, Ghazal Hosseini Mighan, Amir Zamir, Maria Brbic
ICLR1
2024 Let Go of Your Labels with Unsupervised Transfer
abstract
Foundation vision-language models have enabled remarkable zero-shot transferability of the pre-trained representations to a wide range of downstream tasks. However, to solve a new task, zero-shot transfer still necessitates human guidance to define visual categories that appear in the data. Here, we show that fully unsupervised transfer emerges when searching for the labeling of a dataset that induces maximal margin classifiers in representation spaces of different foundation models. We present TURTLE, a fully unsupervised method that effectively employs this guiding principle to uncover the underlying labeling of a downstream dataset without any supervision and task-specific representation learning. We evaluate TURTLE on a diverse benchmark suite of 26 datasets and show that it achieves new state-of-the-art unsupervised performance. Furthermore, TURTLE, although being fully unsupervised, outperforms zero-shot transfer baselines on a wide range of datasets. In particular, TURTLE matches the average performance of CLIP zero-shot on 26 datasets by employing the same representation space, spanning a wide range of architectures and model sizes. By guiding the search for the underlying labeling using the representation spaces of two foundation models, TURTLE surpasses zero-shot transfer and unsupervised prompt tuning baselines, demonstrating the surprising power and effectiveness of unsupervised transfer.
Artyom Gadetsky, Yulun Jiang, Maria Brbic
ICML1
2024 Fine-grained Classes and How to Find Them
abstract
In many practical applications, coarse-grained labels are readily available compared to fine-grained labels that reflect subtle differences between classes. However, existing methods cannot leverage coarse labels to infer fine-grained labels in an unsupervised manner. To bridge this gap, we propose FALCON, a method that discovers fine-grained classes from coarsely labeled data without any supervision at the fine-grained level. FALCON simultaneously infers unknown fine-grained classes and underlying relationships between coarse and fine-grained classes. Moreover, FALCON is a modular method that can effectively learn from multiple datasets labeled with different strategies. We evaluate FALCON on eight image classification tasks and a single-cell classification task. FALCON outperforms baselines by a large margin, achieving 22% improvement over the best baseline on the tieredImageNet dataset with over 600 fine-grained classes.
Matej Grcic, Artyom Gadetsky, Maria Brbic
ICML2
2023 The Pursuit of Human Labeling: A New Perspective on Unsupervised Learning
abstract
We present HUME, a simple model-agnostic framework for inferring human labeling of a given dataset without any external supervision. The key insight behind our approach is that classes defined by many human labelings are linearly separable regardless of the representation space used to represent a dataset. HUME utilizes this insight to guide the search over all possible labelings of a dataset to discover an underlying human labeling. We show that the proposed optimization objective is strikingly well-correlated with the ground truth labeling of the dataset. In effect, we only train linear classifiers on top of pretrained representations that remain fixed during training, making our framework compatible with any large pretrained and self-supervised model. Despite its simplicity, HUME outperforms a supervised linear classifier on top of self-supervised representations on the STL-10 dataset by a large margin and achieves comparable performance on the CIFAR-10 dataset. Compared to the existing unsupervised baselines, HUME achieves state-of-the-art performance on four benchmark image classification datasets including the large-scale ImageNet-1000 dataset. Altogether, our work provides a fundamentally new view to tackle unsupervised learning by searching for consistent labelings between different representation spaces.
Artyom Gadetsky, Maria Brbic
NeurIPS1
2021 Leveraging Recursive Gumbel-Max Trick for Approximate Inference in Combinatorial Spaces
abstract
Structured latent variables allow incorporating meaningful prior knowledge into deep learning models. However, learning with such variables remains challenging because of their discrete nature. Nowadays, the standard learning approach is to define a latent variable as a perturbed algorithm output and to use a differentiable surrogate for training. In general, the surrogate puts additional constraints on the model and inevitably leads to biased gradients. To alleviate these shortcomings, we extend the Gumbel-Max trick to define distributions over structured domains. We avoid the differentiable surrogates by leveraging the score function estimators for optimization. In particular, we highlight a family of recursive algorithms with a common feature we call stochastic invariant. The feature allows us to construct reliable gradient estimates and control variates without additional constraints on the model. In our experiments, we consider various structured latent variable models and achieve results competitive with relaxation-based counterparts.
Kirill Struminsky, Artyom Gadetsky, Denis Rakitin, Danil Karpushkin, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS2
2020 Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce Distribution
abstract
Learning models with discrete latent variables using stochastic gradient descent remains a challenge due to the high variance of gradient estimates. Modern variance reduction techniques mostly consider categorical distributions and have limited applicability when the number of possible outcomes becomes large. In this work, we consider models with latent permutations and propose control variates for the Plackett-Luce distribution. In particular, the control variates allow us to optimize black-box functions over permutations using stochastic gradient descent. To illustrate the approach, we consider a variety of causal structure learning tasks for continuous and discrete data. We show that our method outperforms competitive relaxation-based optimization methods and is also applicable to non-differentiable score functions.
Artyom Gadetsky, Kirill Struminsky, Christopher Robinson, Novi Quadrianto, Dmitry P. Vetrov
AAAI1