EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vitali Petsiuk
dblp:222/3091
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9565-4511ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 66% Image recognition and object detection · 20% Generative modeling · 14% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | Guided Zoom: Zooming into Network Evidence to Refine Fine-Grained Model Decisions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Black-Box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Maps · CVPR 2021 Why Do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models · ECCV (11) 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models · ECCV (88) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
generative model safety |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models · ECCV (88) 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Zoom: Zooming into Network Evidence to Refine Fine-Grained Model Decisions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › post-hoc explanation
model-agnostic explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Black-Box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Maps · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Zoom: Zooming into Network Evidence to Refine Fine-Grained Model Decisions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Black-Box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Maps · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Black-Box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Maps · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Why Do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models · ECCV (11) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
latent space manipulation · 0.8concept arithmetic · 0.8similarity metric · 0.5saliency map · 0.5perturbation-based explanation · 0.5guided zoom · 0.5evidence grounding · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models
Vitali Petsiuk, Kate Saenko |
ECCV (88) | 1 |
| 2021 | Black-Box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency MapsabstractWe propose D-RISE, a method for generating visual explanations for the predictions of object detectors. Utilizing the proposed similarity metric that accounts for both localization and categorization aspects of object detection allows our method to produce saliency maps that show image areas that most affect the prediction. D-RISE can be considered "black-box" in the software testing sense, as it only needs access to the inputs and outputs of an object detector. Compared to gradient-based methods, D-RISE is more general and agnostic to the particular type of object detector being tested, and does not need knowledge of the inner workings of the model. We show that D-RISE can be easily applied to different object detectors including one-stage detectors such as YOLOv3 and two-stage detectors such as Faster-RCNN. We present a detailed analysis of the generated visual explanations to highlight the utilization of context and possible biases learned by object detectors. Vitali Petsiuk, Rajiv Jain, Varun Manjunatha, Vlad I. Morariu, Ashutosh Mehra 0002, Vicente Ordonez, Kate Saenko |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Guided Zoom: Zooming into Network Evidence to Refine Fine-Grained Model DecisionsabstractIn state-of-the-art deep single-label classification models, the top- k (k=2,3,4, ...) accuracy is usually significantly higher than the top-1 accuracy. This is more evident in fine-grained datasets, where differences between classes are quite subtle. Exploiting the information provided in the top k predicted classes boosts the final prediction of a model. We propose Guided Zoom, a novel way in which explainability could be used to improve model performance. We do so by making sure the model has "the right reasons" for a prediction. The reason/evidence upon which a deep neural network makes a prediction is defined to be the grounding, in the pixel space, for a specific class conditional probability in the model output. Guided Zoom examines how reasonable the evidence used to make each of the top- k predictions is. Test time evidence is deemed reasonable if it is coherent with evidence used to make similar correct decisions at training time. This leads to better informed predictions. We explore a variety of grounding techniques and study their complementarity for computing evidence. We show that Guided Zoom results in an improvement of a model's classification accuracy and achieves state-of-the-art classification performance on four fine-grained classification datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/andreazuna89/Guided-Zoom. Sarah Adel Bargal, Andrea Zunino, Vitali Petsiuk, Jianming Zhang 0001, Kate Saenko, Vittorio Murino, Stan Sclaroff |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2020 | Why Do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Bryan A. Plummer, Mariya I. Vasileva, Vitali Petsiuk, Kate Saenko, David A. Forsyth |
ECCV (11) | 3 |
| 2019 | Guided Zoom: Questioning Network Evidence for Fine-grained Classification
Sarah Adel Bargal, Andrea Zunino, Vitali Petsiuk, Jianming Zhang 0001, Kate Saenko, Vittorio Murino, Stan Sclaroff |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2018 | RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models
Vitali Petsiuk, Abir Das, Kate Saenko |
BMVC | 1 |