Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jack Jewson
dblp:222/3206
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 92% Time series and sequential data · 8% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | An Optimization-centric View on Bayes' Rule: Reviewing and Generalizing Variational Inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | An Optimization-centric View on Bayes' Rule: Reviewing and Generalizing Variational Inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Statistical Inference through β-Divergence One Posterior Sampling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Statistical Inference through β-Divergence One Posterior Sampling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
collapsed variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Optimization-centric View on Bayes' Rule: Reviewing and Generalizing Variational Inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
change-point detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › generalized bayesian inference
robust bayesian inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
structured variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Data stream processing
streaming analytics |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-Divergences · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
β-divergence · 1.3one posterior sampling · 1.3structural variational approximation · 0.7general bayesian inference · 0.7beta-divergence · 0.7deep gaussian process · 0.6bayesian neural network · 0.6PAC-Bayesian inference · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Differentially Private Statistical Inference through β-Divergence One Posterior Sampling
Jack Jewson, Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Christopher C. Holmes |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Mitigating statistical bias within differentially private synthetic dataabstractIncreasing interest in privacy-preserving machine learning has led to new and evolved approaches for generating private synthetic data from undisclosed real data. However, mechanisms of privacy preservation can significantly reduce the utility of synthetic data, which in turn impacts downstream tasks such as learning predictive models or inference. We propose several re-weighting strategies using privatised likelihood ratios that not only mitigate statistical bias of downstream estimators but also have general applicability to differentially private generative models. Through large-scale empirical evaluation, we show that private importance weighting provides simple and effective privacy-compliant augmentation for general applications of synthetic data. Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Harry Wilde, Jack Jewson, Arnaud Doucet, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Christopher C. Holmes |
UAI | 3 |
| 2022 | An Optimization-centric View on Bayes' Rule: Reviewing and Generalizing Variational InferenceabstractWe advocate an optimization-centric view of Bayesian inference. Our inspiration is the representation of Bayes' rule as infinite-dimensional optimization (Csiszar, 1975; Donsker and Varadhan, 1975; Zellner, 1988). Equipped with this perspective, we study Bayesian inference when one does not have access to (1) well-specified priors, (2) well-specified likelihoods, (3) infinite computing power. While these three assumptions underlie the standard Bayesian paradigm, they are typically inappropriate for modern Machine Learning applications. We propose addressing this through an optimization-centric generalization of Bayesian posteriors that we call the Rule of Three (RoT). The RoT can be justified axiomatically and recovers Bayesian, PAC-Bayesian and VI posteriors as special cases. While the RoT is primarily a conceptual and theoretical device, it also encompasses a novel sub-class of tractable posteriors which we call Generalized Variational Inference (GVI) posteriors. Just as the RoT, GVI posteriors are specified by three arguments: a loss, a divergence and a variational family. They also possess a number of desirable properties, including modularity, Frequentist consistency and an interpretation as approximate ELBO. We explore applications of GVI posteriors, and show that they can be used to improve robustness and posterior marginals on Bayesian Neural Networks and Deep Gaussian Processes. Jeremias Knoblauch, Jack Jewson, Theodoros Damoulas |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Foundations of Bayesian Learning from Synthetic DataabstractThere is significant growth and interest in the use of synthetic data as an enabler for machine learning in environments where the release of real data is restricted due to privacy or availability constraints. Despite a large number of methods for synthetic data generation, there are comparatively few results on the statistical properties of models learnt on synthetic data, and fewer still for situations where a researcher wishes to augment real data with another party’s synthesised data. We use a Bayesian paradigm to characterise the updating of model parameters when learning in these settings, demonstrating that caution should be taken when applying conventional learning algorithms without appropriate consideration of the synthetic data generating process and learning task at hand. Recent results from general Bayesian updating support a novel and robust approach to Bayesian synthetic-learning founded on decision theory that outperforms standard approaches across repeated experiments on supervised learning and inference problems. Harrison Wilde, Jack Jewson, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Christopher C. Holmes |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2018 | Doubly Robust Bayesian Inference for Non-Stationary Streaming Data with \beta-DivergencesabstractWe present the very first robust Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection algorithm through General Bayesian Inference (GBI) with $\beta$-divergences. The resulting inference procedure is doubly robust for both the predictive and the changepoint (CP) posterior, with linear time and constant space complexity. We provide a construction for exponential models and demonstrate it on the Bayesian Linear Regression model. In so doing, we make two additional contributions: Firstly, we make GBI scalable using Structural Variational approximations that are exact as $\beta \to 0$. Secondly, we give a principled way of choosing the divergence parameter $\beta$ by minimizing expected predictive loss on-line. Reducing False Discovery Rates of \CPs from up to 99\% to 0\% on real world data, this offers the state of the art. Jeremias Knoblauch, Jack Jewson, Theodoros Damoulas |
NeurIPS | 2 |