Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Louis C. Tiao
dblp:222/3231
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 41% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 36% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 7% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Spherical Inducing Features for Orthogonally-Decoupled Gaussian Processes · ICML 2023 Variational Inference for Graph Convolutional Networks in the Absence of Graph Data and Adversarial Settings · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Spherical Inducing Features for Orthogonally-Decoupled Gaussian Processes · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Spherical Inducing Features for Orthogonally-Decoupled Gaussian Processes · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guarantees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
expected improvement |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio Estimation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Variational Inference for Graph Convolutional Networks in the Absence of Graph Data and Adversarial Settings · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Variational Inference for Graph Convolutional Networks in the Absence of Graph Data and Adversarial Settings · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Variational Inference for Graph Convolutional Networks in the Absence of Graph Data and Adversarial Settings · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spherical inducing features · 0.7orthogonal decomposition · 0.7neural network activation · 0.7gaussian process · 0.6approximate bayesian inference · 0.6BORE · 0.6density ratio estimation · 0.5binary classification · 0.5continuous relaxation · 0.4concrete distribution · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Spherical Inducing Features for Orthogonally-Decoupled Gaussian ProcessesabstractDespite their many desirable properties, Gaussian processes (GPs) are often compared unfavorably to deep neural networks (NNs) for lacking the ability to learn representations. Recent efforts to bridge the gap between GPs and deep NNs have yielded a new class of inter-domain variational GPs in which the inducing variables correspond to hidden units of a feedforward NN. In this work, we examine some practical issues associated with this approach and propose an extension that leverages the orthogonal decomposition of GPs to mitigate these limitations. In particular, we introduce spherical inter-domain features to construct more flexible data-dependent basis functions for both the principal and orthogonal components of the GP approximation and show that incorporating NN activation features under this framework not only alleviates these shortcomings but is more scalable than alternative strategies. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Louis C. Tiao, Vincent Dutordoir, Victor Picheny |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guaranteesabstractBayesian optimisation (BO) algorithms have shown remarkable success in applications involving expensive black-box functions. Traditionally BO has been set as a sequential decision-making process which estimates the utility of query points via an acquisition function and a prior over functions, such as a Gaussian process. Recently, however, a reformulation of BO via density-ratio estimation (BORE) allowed reinterpreting the acquisition function as a probabilistic binary classifier, removing the need for an explicit prior over functions and increasing scalability. In this paper, we present a theoretical analysis of BORE's regret and an extension of the algorithm with improved uncertainty estimates. We also show that BORE can be naturally extended to a batch optimisation setting by recasting the problem as approximate Bayesian inference. The resulting algorithms come equipped with theoretical performance guarantees and are assessed against other batch and sequential BO baselines in a series of experiments. Rafael Oliveira 0001, Louis C. Tiao, Fabio Ramos 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio EstimationabstractBayesian optimization (BO) is among the most effective and widely-used blackbox optimization methods. BO proposes solutions according to an explore-exploit trade-off criterion encoded in an acquisition function, many of which are computed from the posterior predictive of a probabilistic surrogate model. Prevalent among these is the expected improvement (EI). The need to ensure analytical tractability of the predictive often poses limitations that can hinder the efficiency and applicability of BO. In this paper, we cast the computation of EI as a binary classification problem, building on the link between class-probability estimation and density-ratio estimation, and the lesser-known link between density-ratios and EI. By circumventing the tractability constraints, this reformulation provides numerous advantages, not least in terms of expressiveness, versatility, and scalability. Louis C. Tiao, Aaron Klein, Matthias W. Seeger, Edwin V. Bonilla, Cédric Archambeau, Fabio Ramos 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Variational Inference for Graph Convolutional Networks in the Absence of Graph Data and Adversarial SettingsabstractWe propose a framework that lifts the capabilities of graph convolutional networks (GCNs) to scenarios where no input graph is given and increases their robustness to adversarial attacks. We formulate a joint probabilistic model that considers a prior distribution over graphs along with a GCN-based likelihood and develop a stochastic variational inference algorithm to estimate the graph posterior and the GCN parameters jointly. To address the problem of propagating gradients through latent variables drawn from discrete distributions, we use their continuous relaxations known as Concrete distributions. We show that, on real datasets, our approach can outperform state-of-the-art Bayesian and non-Bayesian graph neural network algorithms on the task of semi-supervised classification in the absence of graph data and when the network structure is subjected to adversarial perturbations. Pantelis Elinas, Edwin V. Bonilla, Louis C. Tiao |
NeurIPS | 3 |