Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanat Anand
dblp:222/3268
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 73% Malware analysis · 27% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Malware analysis › malware defense
malware propagation containment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Uncovering Algebraic Structures in the MPC Landscape · EUROCRYPT (2) 2019 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Brief Announcement: On Secure m-Party Computation, Commuting Permutation Systems and Unassisted Non-Interactive MPC · ICALP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information-theoretic security · 0.7algebraic characterization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Uncovering Algebraic Structures in the MPC Landscape
Navneet Agarwal, Sanat Anand, Manoj Prabhakaran 0001 |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 2 |
| 2018 | Brief Announcement: On Secure m-Party Computation, Commuting Permutation Systems and Unassisted Non-Interactive MPCabstractA fundamental problem in the theory of secure multi-party computation (MPC) is to characterize functions with more than 2 parties which admit MPC protocols with information-theoretic security against passive corruption. This question has seen little progress since the work of Chor and Ishai (2001), which demonstrated difficulties in resolving it. In this work, we make significant progress towards resolving this question in the important case of aggregating functionalities, in which m parties P1,...,Pm hold inputs x1,...,xm and an aggregating party P0 must learn f(x1,...,xm). We give a necessary condition and a slightly stronger sufficient condition for f to admit a secure protocol. Both the conditions are stated in terms of an algebraic structure we introduce called Commuting Permutations Systems (CPS), which may be of independent combinatorial interest. When our sufficiency condition is met, we obtain a perfectly secure protocol with minimal interaction, that fits the model of Non-Interactive MPC or NIMPC (Beimel et al., 2014), but without the need for a trusted party to generate correlated randomness. We define Unassisted Non-Interactive MPC (UNIMPC) to capture this variant. We also present an NIMPC protocol for all functionalities, which is simpler and more efficient than the one given in the prior work. Navneet Agarwal, Sanat Anand, Manoj Prabhakaran 0001 |
ICALP | 2 |