Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kuntal Kumar Pal
dblp:222/3430
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1278-3252ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 51% Question answering and dialogue systems · 34% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 15% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › reverse engineering
binary reverse engineering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | "Len or index or count, anything but v1": Predicting Variable Names in Decompilation Output with Transfer Learning · SP 2024 |
Systems and software security › reverse engineering
decompilation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | "Len or index or count, anything but v1": Predicting Variable Names in Decompilation Output with Transfer Learning · SP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering › knowledge-grounded question answering
open book question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Careful Selection of Knowledge to Solve Open Book Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019 |
Program analysis
binary analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | "Len or index or count, anything but v1": Predicting Variable Names in Decompilation Output with Transfer Learning · SP 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot task generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.5pre-training · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5BERT · 1.5weighted scoring · 0.8passage selection · 0.8language model · 0.8information gain based re-ranking · 0.8large language model · 0.6declarative instructions · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | "Len or index or count, anything but v1": Predicting Variable Names in Decompilation Output with Transfer LearningabstractBinary reverse engineering is an arduous and tedious task performed by skilled and expensive human analysts. Information about the source code is irrevocably lost in the compilation process. While modern decompilers attempt to generate C-style source code from a binary, they cannot recover lost variable names. Prior works have explored machine learning techniques for predicting variable names in decompiled code. However, the state-of-the-art systems, DIRE and DIRTY, generalize poorly to functions in the testing set that are not included in the training set—31.8% for DIRE on DIRTY’s data set and 36.9% for DIRTY on DIRTY’s data set.In this paper, we present VarBERT, a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to predict meaningful variable names in decompilation output. An advantage of VarBERT is that we can pre-train on human source code and then fine-tune the model to the task of predicting variable names. We also create a new data set VarCorpus, which significantly expands the size and variety of the data set. Our evaluation of VarBERT on VarCorpus, demonstrates a significant improvement in predicting the developer’s original variable names for O2 optimized binaries achieving accuracies of 54.43% for IDA and 54.49% for Ghidra. VarBERT is strictly better than state-of-the-art techniques: On a subset of VarCorpus, VarBERT could predict the developer’s original variable names 50.70% of the time, while DIRE and DIRTY predicted original variable names 35.94% and 38.00% of the time, respectively. Kuntal Kumar Pal, Ati Priya Bajaj, Pratyay Banerjee, Audrey Dutcher, Mutsumi Nakamura, Zion Leonahenahe Basque, Saurabh Arjun Sawant, Ujjwala Anantheswaran, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Adam Doupé, Chitta Baral, Ruoyu Wang 0001 |
SP | 1 |
| 2023 | "John is 50 years old, can his son be 65?" Evaluating NLP Models' Understanding of FeasibilityabstractHimanshu Gupta, Neeraj Varshney, Swaroop Mishra, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Saurabh Arjun Sawant, Kevin Scaria, Siddharth Goyal, Chitta Baral. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023. Neeraj Varshney, Swaroop Mishra, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Saurabh Arjun Sawant, Kevin Scaria, Siddharth Goyal, Chitta Baral |
EACL | 4 |
| 2022 | Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksabstractYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Anjana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Lai, Ishan Purohit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Patel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Keyur Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit, Xudong Shen. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022. Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Anjana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Gary Lai, Ishan Purohit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Patel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma 0001, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit |
EMNLP | 19 |
| 2021 | Biomedical Named Entity Recognition via Knowledge Guidance and Question AnsweringabstractIn this work, we formulated the named entity recognition (NER) task as a multi-answer knowledge guided question-answer task (KGQA) and showed that the knowledge guidance helps to achieve state-of-the-art results for 11 of 18 biomedical NER datasets. We prepended five different knowledge contexts—entity types, questions, definitions, and examples—to the input text and trained and tested BERT-based neural models on such input sequences from a combined dataset of the 18 different datasets. This novel formulation of the task (a) improved named entity recognition and illustrated the impact of different knowledge contexts, (b) reduced system confusion by limiting prediction to a single entity-class for each input token (i.e.,B,I,Oonly) compared to multiple entity-classes in traditional NER (i.e.,Bentity1,Bentity2,Ientity1,I,O), (c) made detection of nested entities easier, and (d) enabled the models to jointly learn NER-specific features from a large number of datasets. We performed extensive experiments of this KGQA formulation on the biomedical datasets, and through the experiments, we showed when knowledge improved named entity recognition. We analyzed the effect of the task formulation, the impact of the different knowledge contexts, the multi-task aspect of the generic format, and the generalization ability of KGQA. We also probed the model to better understand the key contributors for these improvements. Pratyay Banerjee, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Murthy V. Devarakonda, Chitta Baral |
ACM Trans. Comput. Heal. | 2 |
| 2019 | Careful Selection of Knowledge to Solve Open Book Question AnsweringabstractOpen book question answering is a type of natural language based QA (NLQA) where questions are expected to be answered with respect to a given set of open book facts, and common knowledge about a topic. Recently a challenge involving such QA, OpenBookQA, has been proposed. Unlike most other NLQA that focus on linguistic understanding, OpenBookQA requires deeper reasoning involving linguistic understanding as well as reasoning with common knowledge. In this paper we address QA with respect to the OpenBookQA dataset and combine state of the art language models with abductive information retrieval (IR), information gain based re-ranking, passage selection and weighted scoring to achieve 72.0% accuracy, an 11.6% improvement over the current state of the art. Pratyay Banerjee, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral |
ACL (1) | 2 |