Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jevgenij Huebert

dblp:222/5857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 61% Program analysis · 30% Software testing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
graph transformation
0.312018
Multi-granular conflict and dependency analysis in software engineering based on graph transformation · ICSE 2018
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.312018
Multi-granular conflict and dependency analysis in software engineering based on graph transformation · ICSE 2018
Program analysis
static analysis
0.312018
Multi-granular conflict and dependency analysis in software engineering based on graph transformation · ICSE 2018
Software testing › software testing evaluation
test result analysis
0.112018
Multi-granular conflict and dependency analysis in software engineering based on graph transformation · ICSE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.3graph transformation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Multi-granular conflict and dependency analysis in software engineering based on graph transformation
abstract
Conflict and dependency analysis (CDA) of graph transformation has been shown to be a versatile foundation for understanding interactions in many software engineering domains, including software analysis and design, model-driven engineering, and testing. In this paper, we propose a novel static CDA technique that is multi-granular in the sense that it can detect all conflicts and dependencies on multiple granularity levels. Specifically, we provide an efficient algorithm suite for computing binary, coarse-grained, and fine-grained conflicts and dependencies: Binary granularity indicates the presence or absence of conflicts and dependencies, coarse granularity focuses on root causes for conflicts and dependencies, and fine granularity shows each conflict and dependency in full detail. Doing so, we can address specific performance and usability requirements that we identified in a literature survey of CDA usage scenarios. In an experimental evaluation, our algorithm suite computes conflicts and dependencies rapidly. Finally, we present a user study, in which the participants found our coarse-grained results more understandable than the fine-grained ones reported in a state-of-the-art tool. Our overall contribution is twofold: (i) we significantly speed up the computation of fine-grained and binary CDA results and, (ii) complement them with coarse-grained ones, which offer usability benefits for numerous use cases.
Leen Lambers, Daniel Strüber 0001, Gabriele Taentzer, Kristopher Born, Jevgenij Huebert
ICSE5