Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Sandhya Sankaranarayanan

dblp:222/5874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 61% Empirical software engineering · 30% Software testing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair		 0.312018
Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs? · ICSE 2018
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories		 0.312018
Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs? · ICSE 2018
Debugging and program repair › automated program repair
patch quality		 0.312018
Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs? · ICSE 2018
Software testing
test suite		 0.112018
Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs? · ICSE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs?
abstract
Automated program repair techniques use a buggy program and a partial specification (typically a test suite) to produce a program variant that satisfies the specification. While prior work has studied patch quality [10, 11] and maintainability [2], it has not examined whether automated repair techniques are capable of repairing defects that developers consider important or that are hard for developers to repair manually. This paper tackles those questions.
Manish Motwani, Sandhya Sankaranarayanan, René Just, Yuriy Brun
 ICSE2
2018 Do automated program repair techniques repair hard and important bugs?
Manish Motwani, Sandhya Sankaranarayanan, René Just, Yuriy Brun
 Empir. Softw. Eng.2