EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Takahiro Miyoshi
dblp:222/7907
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
ensemble forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamically Forming a Group of Human Forecasters and Machine Forecaster for Forecasting Economic Indicators · IJCAI 2018 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dynamically Forming a Group of Human Forecasters and Machine Forecaster for Forecasting Economic Indicators · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.7ensemble · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Dynamically Forming a Group of Human Forecasters and Machine Forecaster for Forecasting Economic IndicatorsabstractHow can human forecasts and a machine forecast be combined in inflation forecast tasks? A machine-learning-based forecaster makes a forecast based on a statistical model constructed from past time-series data, while humans take varied information such as economic policies into account. Combination methods for different forecasts have been studied such as ensemble and consensus methods. These methods, however, always use the same manner of combination regardless of the situation (input), which makes it difficult to use the advantages of different types of forecasters. To overcome this drawback, we propose an ensemble method for estimating the expected error of a machine forecast and dynamically determining the optimal number of humans included in the ensemble. We evaluated the proposed method by using the seven datasets on U.S. inflation and confirmed that it attained the highest forecast accuracy for four datasets and the same accuracy as the highest one of traditional methods for two datasets. Takahiro Miyoshi, Shigeo Matsubara |
IJCAI | 1 |