Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianshang Liu
dblp:222/7965
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 61% Vision and language · 30% Image recognition and object detection · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multimodal sentence summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-modal Sentence Summarization with Modality Attention and Image Filtering · IJCAI 2018 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language generation
multimodal summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-modal Sentence Summarization with Modality Attention and Image Filtering · IJCAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-modal Sentence Summarization with Modality Attention and Image Filtering · IJCAI 2018 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
multimodal evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MSMO: Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output · EMNLP 2018 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
multimodal summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | MSMO: Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output · EMNLP 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual feature extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Multi-modal Sentence Summarization with Modality Attention and Image Filtering · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal attention model · 0.3modality attention · 0.3image filtering · 0.3attention mechanism · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | MSMO: Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal OutputabstractMultimodal summarization has drawn much attention due to the rapid growth of multimedia data.The output of the current multimodal summarization systems is usually represented in texts.However, we have found through experiments that multimodal output can significantly improve user satisfaction for informativeness of summaries.In this paper, we propose a novel task, multimodal summarization with multimodal output (MSMO).To handle this task, we first collect a large-scale dataset for MSMO research.We then propose a multimodal attention model to jointly generate text and select the most relevant image from the multimodal input.Finally, to evaluate multimodal outputs, we construct a novel multimodal automatic evaluation (MMAE) method which considers both intramodality salience and intermodality relevance.The experimental results show the effectiveness of MMAE. Junnan Zhu, Haoran Li 0001, Tianshang Liu, Yu Zhou 0001, Jiajun Zhang 0001, Chengqing Zong |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2018 | Multi-modal Sentence Summarization with Modality Attention and Image FilteringabstractIn this paper, we introduce a multi-modal sentence summarization task that produces a short summary from a pair of sentence and image. This task is more challenging than sentence summarization. It not only needs to effectively incorporate visual features into standard text summarization framework, but also requires to avoid noise of image. To this end, we propose a modality-based attention mechanism to pay different attention to image patches and text units, and we design image filters to selectively use visual information to enhance the semantics of the input sentence. We construct a multimodal sentence summarization dataset and extensive experiments on this dataset demonstrate that our models significantly outperform conventional models which only employ text as input. Further analyses suggest that sentence summarization task can benefit from visually grounded representations from a variety of aspects. Haoran Li 0001, Junnan Zhu, Tianshang Liu, Jiajun Zhang 0001, Chengqing Zong |
IJCAI | 3 |