Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunfei Niu
dblp:222/7979
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 65% Generative modeling · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning › multi-view clustering
incomplete multi-view clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning
multi-view clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › matrix factorization
multi-view matrix factorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Multi-View Concept Learning · IJCAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning
multi-view representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Multi-View Concept Learning · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative adversarial network · 0.4adversarial learning · 0.4semi-supervised learning · 0.3non-negative factorization · 0.3block coordinate descent · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view ClusteringabstractMulti-view clustering aims to leverage information from multiple views to improve clustering. Most previous works assumed that each view has complete data. However, in real-world datasets, it is often the case that a view may contain some missing data, resulting in the incomplete multi-view clustering problem. Previous methods for this problem have at least one of the following drawbacks: (1) employing shallow models, which cannot well handle the dependence and discrepancy among different views; (2) ignoring the hidden information of the missing data; (3) dedicated to the two-view case. To eliminate all these drawbacks, in this work we present an Adversarial Incomplete Multi-view Clustering (AIMC) method. Unlike most existing methods which only learn a new representation with existing views, AIMC seeks the common latent space of multi-view data and performs missing data inference simultaneously. In particular, the element-wise reconstruction and the generative adversarial network (GAN) are integrated to infer the missing data. They aim to capture overall structure and get a deeper semantic understanding respectively. Moreover, an aligned clustering loss is designed to obtain a better clustering structure. Experiments conducted on three datasets show that AIMC performs well and outperforms baseline methods. Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao 0019, Hongchang Wu, Yunfei Niu, Beilei Ling |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 2018 | Deep Multi-View Concept LearningabstractMulti-view data is common in real-world datasets, where different views describe distinct perspectives. To better summarize the consistent and complementary information in multi-view data, researchers have proposed various multi-view representation learning algorithms, typically based on factorization models. However, most previous methods were focused on shallow factorization models which cannot capture the complex hierarchical information. Although a deep multi-view factorization model has been proposed recently, it fails to explicitly discern consistent and complementary information in multi-view data and does not consider conceptual labels. In this work we present a semi-supervised deep multi-view factorization method, named Deep Multi-view Concept Learning (DMCL). DMCL performs nonnegative factorization of the data hierarchically, and tries to capture semantic structures and explicitly model consistent and complementary information in multi-view data at the highest abstraction level. We develop a block coordinate descent algorithm for DMCL. Experiments conducted on image and document datasets show that DMCL performs well and outperforms baseline methods. Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao 0019, Yunfei Niu, Quan Wang 0006, Zhiheng Wang 0001 |
IJCAI | 4 |