Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xisen Jin
dblp:222/9324
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
9as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 9 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 39% Learning paradigms · 27% Language models and text generation · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanations · NeurIPS 2021 Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Models · ICLR 2020 Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model Refinement · ICML 2024 Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model Refinement · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2024 | Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2021 What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model Refinement · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering
knowledge integration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
compositional explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
memory replay |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
model refinement |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious correlation mitigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional Explanations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
task-free continual learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Models · ICLR 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
hate speech detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model explanation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Models · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
post-hoc explanation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › pre-trained model continual learning
vision-language model continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Visually Grounded Continual Learning of Compositional Phrases · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › grounded language learning
visually grounded language learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Visually Grounded Continual Learning of Compositional Phrases · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Knowledge graphs › temporal knowledge graph
temporal knowledge graph reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Recurrent Event Network: Autoregressive Structure Inferenceover Temporal Knowledge Graphs · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sequicity: Simplifying Task-oriented Dialogue Systems with Single Sequence-to-Sequence Architectures · ACL (1) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 0.9replay · 0.8logit analysis · 0.8classifier · 0.8weight merging · 0.7knowledge fusion · 0.7memory replay · 0.5logic rule parsing · 0.5gradient-based example editing · 0.5recurrent neural network · 0.4neighborhood aggregation · 0.4autoregressive model · 0.4BERT · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Demystifying Language Model Forgetting with Low-rank Example AssociationsabstractLarge Language models (LLMs) suffer from forgetting of upstream knowledge when fine-tuned. Despite efforts on mitigating forgetting, few have investigated how forgotten upstream examples are dependent on newly learned tasks. Insights on such dependencies enable efficient and targeted mitigation of forgetting. In this paper, we empirically analyze forgetting that occurs in $N$ upstream examples of language modeling or instruction-tuning after fine-tuning LLMs on one of $M$ new tasks, visualized in $M\times N$ matrices. We show that the matrices are often well-approximated with low-rank matrices, indicating the dominance of simple associations between the learned tasks and forgotten upstream examples. Leveraging the analysis, we predict forgetting of upstream examples when fine-tuning LLMs on unseen tasks with matrix completion over the empirical associations. This enables fast identification of most forgotten examples without expensive inference on the entire upstream data. Despite simplicity, the approach outperforms prior approaches that learn semantic relationships of learned tasks and upstream examples with LMs. We demonstrate the practical utility of our analysis by showing statistically significantly reduced forgetting as we upweight predicted examples for replay during fine-tuning. Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model RefinementabstractLanguage models deployed in the wild make errors. However, simply updating the model with the corrected error instances causes catastrophic forgetting---the updated model makes errors on instances learned during the instruction tuning or upstream training phase. Randomly replaying upstream data yields unsatisfactory performance and often comes with high variance and poor controllability. To this end, we try to forecast upstream examples that will be forgotten due to a model update for improved controllability of the replay process and interpretability. We train forecasting models given a collection of online learned examples and corresponding forgotten upstream pre-training examples. We propose a partially interpretable forecasting model based on the observation that changes in pre-softmax logit scores of pretraining examples resemble that of online learned examples, which performs decently on BART but fails on T5 models. We further show a black-box classifier based on inner products of example representations achieves better forecasting performance over a series of setups. Finally, we show that we reduce forgetting of upstream pretraining examples by replaying examples that are forecasted to be forgotten, demonstrating the practical utility of forecasting example forgetting. Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models
Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Pengxiang Cheng 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Lifelong Pretraining: Continually Adapting Language Models to Emerging CorporaabstractXisen Jin, Dejiao Zhang, Henghui Zhu, Wei Xiao, Shang-Wen Li, Xiaokai Wei, Andrew Arnold, Xiang Ren. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Xisen Jin, Dejiao Zhang, Henghui Zhu, Wei Xiao 0001, Shang-Wen Li 0001, Xiaokai Wei, Andrew O. Arnold, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2021 | On Transferability of Bias Mitigation Effects in Language Model Fine-TuningabstractXisen Jin, Francesco Barbieri, Brendan Kennedy, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Leonardo Neves, Xiang Ren. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Xisen Jin, Francesco Barbieri, Brendan Kennedy 0001, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Leonardo Neves, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2021 | Gradient-based Editing of Memory Examples for Online Task-free Continual LearningabstractWe explore task-free continual learning (CL), in which a model is trained to avoid catastrophic forgetting in the absence of explicit task boundaries or identities. Among many efforts on task-free CL, a notable family of approaches are memory-based that store and replay a subset of training examples. However, the utility of stored seen examples may diminish over time since CL models are continually updated. Here, we propose Gradient based Memory EDiting (GMED), a framework for editing stored examples in continuous input space via gradient updates, in order to create more "challenging" examples for replay. GMED-edited examples remain similar to their unedited forms, but can yield increased loss in the upcoming model updates, thereby making the future replays more effective in overcoming catastrophic forgetting. By construction, GMED can be seamlessly applied in conjunction with other memory-based CL algorithms to bring further improvement. Experiments validate the effectiveness of GMED, and our best method significantly outperforms baselines and previous state-of-the-art on five out of six datasets. Xisen Jin, Arka Sadhu, Junyi Du, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Refining Language Models with Compositional ExplanationsabstractPre-trained language models have been successful on text classification tasks, but are prone to learning spurious correlations from biased datasets, and are thus vulnerable when making inferences in a new domain. Prior work reveals such spurious patterns via post-hoc explanation algorithms which compute the importance of input features. Further, the model is regularized to align the importance scores with human knowledge, so that the unintended model behaviors are eliminated. However, such a regularization technique lacks flexibility and coverage, since only importance scores towards a pre-defined list of features are adjusted, while more complex human knowledge such as feature interaction and pattern generalization can hardly be incorporated. In this work, we propose to refine a learned language model for a target domain by collecting human-provided compositional explanations regarding observed biases. By parsing these explanations into executable logic rules, the human-specified refinement advice from a small set of explanations can be generalized to more training examples. We additionally introduce a regularization term allowing adjustments for both importance and interaction of features to better rectify model behavior. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach on two text classification tasks by showing improved performance in target domain as well as improved model fairness after refinement. Huihan Yao, Qinyuan Ye, Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc ExplanationabstractHate speech classifiers trained on imbalanced datasets struggle to determine if group identifiers like "gay" or "black" are used in offensive or prejudiced ways.Such biases manifest in false positives when these identifiers are present, due to models' inability to learn the contexts which constitute a hateful usage of identifiers.We extract post-hoc explanations from fine-tuned BERT classifiers to detect bias towards identity terms.Then, we propose a novel regularization technique based on these explanations that encourages models to learn from the context of group identifiers in addition to the identifiers themselves.Our approach improved over baselines in limiting false positives on out-of-domain data while maintaining or improving in-domain performance. Brendan Kennedy 0001, Xisen Jin, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, Morteza Dehghani, Xiang Ren 0001 |
ACL | 2 |
| 2020 | Visually Grounded Continual Learning of Compositional PhrasesabstractHumans acquire language continually with much more limited access to data samples at a time, as compared to contemporary NLP systems.To study this human-like language acquisition ability, we present VisCOLL, a visually grounded language learning task, which simulates the continual acquisition of compositional phrases from streaming visual scenes.In the task, models are trained on a paired image-caption stream which has shifting object distribution; while being constantly evaluated by a visually-grounded masked language prediction task on held-out test sets.VisCOLL compounds the challenges of continual learning (i.e., learning from continuously shifting data distribution) and compositional generalization (i.e., generalizing to novel compositions).To facilitate research on VisCOLL, we construct two datasets, COCO-shift and Flickrshift, and benchmark them using different continual learning methods.Results reveal that SoTA continual learning approaches provide little to no improvements on VisCOLL, since storing examples of all possible compositions is infeasible.We conduct further ablations and analysis to guide future work 1 . Xisen Jin, Junyi Du, Arka Sadhu, Ramakant Nevatia, Xiang Ren 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Recurrent Event Network: Autoregressive Structure Inferenceover Temporal Knowledge GraphsabstractKnowledge graph reasoning is a critical task in natural language processing.The task becomes more challenging on temporal knowledge graphs, where each fact is associated with a timestamp.Most existing methods focus on reasoning at past timestamps and they are not able to predict facts happening in the future.This paper proposes Recurrent Event Network (RE-NET), a novel autoregressive architecture for predicting future interactions.The occurrence of a fact (event) is modeled as a probability distribution conditioned on temporal sequences of past knowledge graphs.Specifically, our RE-NET employs a recurrent event encoder to encode past facts, and uses a neighborhood aggregator to model the connection of facts at the same timestamp.Future facts can then be inferred in a sequential manner based on the two modules.We evaluate our proposed method via link prediction at future times on five public datasets.Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the strength of RE-NET, especially on multi-step inference over future timestamps, and achieve state-of-the-art performance on all five datasets 1 . Woojeong Jin 0001, Meng Qu, Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Models
Xisen Jin, Zhongyu Wei, Junyi Du, Xiangyang Xue 0001, Xiang Ren 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2018 | Sequicity: Simplifying Task-oriented Dialogue Systems with Single Sequence-to-Sequence Architecturesabstract10.18653/v1/P18-1133 Wenqiang Lei, Xisen Jin, Min-Yen Kan, Zhaochun Ren, Xiangnan He 0001, Dawei Yin 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | Explicit State Tracking with Semi-Supervisionfor Neural Dialogue GenerationabstractThe task of dialogue generation aims to automatically provide responses given previous utterances. Tracking dialogue states is an important ingredient in dialogue generation for estimating users' intention. However, the expensive nature of state labeling and the weak interpretability make the dialogue state tracking a challenging problem for both task-oriented and non-task-oriented dialogue generation: For generating responses in task-oriented dialogues, state tracking is usually learned from manually annotated corpora, where the human annotation is expensive for training; for generating responses in non-task-oriented dialogues, most of existing work neglects the explicit state tracking due to the unlimited number of dialogue states. Xisen Jin, Wenqiang Lei, Zhaochun Ren, Hongshen Chen, Shangsong Liang, Yihong Eric Zhao, Dawei Yin 0001 |
CIKM | 1 |