Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adithya Pratapa
dblp:222/9370
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Language models and text generation · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data valuation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
gradient projection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › training data attribution
influence function |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
scalable training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Background Summarization of Event Timelines · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphosyntactic analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › retrieval-augmented generation
evidence-grounded reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Constrained Fact Verification for FEVER · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Constrained Fact Verification for FEVER · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
code-switching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Language Modeling for Code-Mixing: The Role of Linguistic Theory based Synthetic Data · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Word Embeddings for Code-Mixed Language Processing · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Word Embeddings for Code-Mixed Language Processing · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic data generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Language Modeling for Code-Mixing: The Role of Linguistic Theory based Synthetic Data · ACL (1) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Word Embeddings for Code-Mixed Language Processing · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Background Summarization of Event Timelines · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
multilingual language modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Language Modeling for Code-Mixing: The Role of Linguistic Theory based Synthetic Data · ACL (1) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval and re-ranking · 1.3auxiliary hierarchical loss · 1.3influence functions · 0.9gradient projection · 0.9zero-shot prompting · 0.7instruction fine-tuning · 0.7morphosyntactic well-formedness metrics · 0.5unsupervised rule extraction · 0.4morphological analysis · 0.4constrained inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence FunctionsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are trained on a vast amount of human-written data, but data providers often remain uncredited. In response to this issue, data valuation (or data attribution), which quantifies the contribution or value of each data to the model output, has been discussed as a potential solution. Nevertheless, applying existing data valuation methods to recent LLMs and their vast training datasets has been largely limited by prohibitive compute and memory costs. In this work, we focus on influence functions, a popular gradient-based data valuation method, and significantly improve its scalability with an efficient gradient projection strategy called LoGra that leverages the gradient structure in backpropagation. We then provide a theoretical motivation of gradient projection approaches to influence functions to promote trust in the data valuation process. Lastly, we lower the barrier to implementing data valuation systems by introducing LogIX, a software package that can transform existing training code into data valuation code with minimal effort. In our data valuation experiments, LoGra achieves competitive accuracy against more expensive baselines while showing up to 6,500x improvement in throughput and 5x reduction in GPU memory usage when applied to Llama3-8B-Instruct and the 1B-token dataset. Sang Keun Choe, Hwijeen Ahn, Juhan Bae, Kewen Zhao, Youngseog Chung, Adithya Pratapa, Willie Neiswanger, Emma Strubell, Teruko Mitamura, Jeff G. Schneider, Eduard H. Hovy, Roger B. Grosse, Eric P. Xing |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | Hierarchical Event GroundingabstractEvent grounding aims at linking mention references in text corpora to events from a knowledge base (KB). Previous work on this task focused primarily on linking to a single KB event, thereby overlooking the hierarchical aspects of events. Events in documents are typically described at various levels of spatio-temporal granularity. These hierarchical relations are utilized in downstream tasks of narrative understanding and schema construction. In this work, we present an extension to the event grounding task that requires tackling hierarchical event structures from the KB. Our proposed task involves linking a mention reference to a set of event labels from a subevent hierarchy in the KB. We propose a retrieval methodology that leverages event hierarchy through an auxiliary hierarchical loss. On an automatically created multilingual dataset from Wikipedia and Wikidata, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the hierarchical loss against retrieve and re-rank baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate the systems' ability to aid hierarchical discovery among unseen events. Code is available at https://github.com/JefferyO/Hierarchical-Event-Grounding Jiefu Ou, Adithya Pratapa, Rishubh Gupta, Teruko Mitamura |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Background Summarization of Event TimelinesabstractGenerating concise summaries of news events is a challenging natural language processing task.While journalists often curate timelines to highlight key sub-events, newcomers to a news event face challenges in catching up on its historical context.In this paper, we address this need by introducing the task of background news summarization, which complements each timeline update with a background summary of relevant preceding events.We construct a dataset by merging existing timeline datasets and asking human annotators to write a background summary for each timestep of each news event.We establish strong baseline performance using state-of-the-art summarization systems and propose a query-focused variant to generate background summaries.To evaluate background summary quality, we present a question-answering-based evaluation metric, Background Utility Score (BUS), which measures the percentage of questions about a current event timestep that a background summary answers.Our experiments show the effectiveness of instruction fine-tuned systems such as Flan-T5, in addition to strong zero-shot performance using GPT-3.5. 1 Adithya Pratapa, Kevin Small, Markus Dreyer |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2021 | Cross-document Event Identity via Dense AnnotationabstractIn this paper, we study the identity of textual events from different documents.While the complex nature of event identity is previously studied (Hovy et al., 2013), the case of events across documents is unclear.Prior work on cross-document event coreference has two main drawbacks.First, they restrict the annotations to a limited set of event types.Second, they insufficiently tackle the concept of event identity.Such annotation setup reduces the pool of event mentions and prevents one from considering the possibility of quasiidentity relations.We propose a dense annotation approach for cross-document event coreference, comprising a rich source of event mentions and a dense annotation effort between related document pairs.To this end, we design a new annotation workflow with careful quality control and an easy-to-use annotation interface.In addition to the links, we further collect overlapping event contexts, including time, location, and participants, to shed some light on the relation between identity decisions and context.We present an open-access dataset for cross-document event coreference, CDEC-WN, collected from English Wikinews and open-source our annotation toolkit to encourage further research on cross-document tasks. 1 Adithya Pratapa, Zhengzhong Liu 0001, Kimihiro Hasegawa, Yukari Yamakawa, Shikun Zhang, Teruko Mitamura |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2021 | Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated TextsabstractAdithya Pratapa, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Shruti Rijhwani, Aditi Chaudhary, David R. Mortensen, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021. Adithya Pratapa, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Shruti Rijhwani, Aditi Chaudhary, David R. Mortensen, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Automatic Extraction of Rules Governing Morphological AgreementabstractAditi Chaudhary, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Adithya Pratapa, David R. Mortensen, Zaid Sheikh, Yulia Tsvetkov, Graham Neubig. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Aditi Chaudhary, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Adithya Pratapa, David R. Mortensen, Zaid Sheikh, Yulia Tsvetkov, Graham Neubig |
EMNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Constrained Fact Verification for FEVERabstractFact-verification systems are well explored in the NLP literature with growing attention owing to shared tasks like FEVER.Though the task requires reasoning on extracted evidence to verify a claim's factuality, there is little work on understanding the reasoning process.In this work, we propose a new methodology for fact-verification, specifically FEVER, that enforces a closed-world reliance on extracted evidence.We present an extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art verification models under these constraints. Adithya Pratapa, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Kavya Nerella |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Language Modeling for Code-Mixing: The Role of Linguistic Theory based Synthetic DataabstractAdithya Pratapa, Gayatri Bhat, Monojit Choudhury, Sunayana Sitaram, Sandipan Dandapat, Kalika Bali. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018. Adithya Pratapa, Gayatri Bhat, Monojit Choudhury, Sunayana Sitaram, Sandipan Dandapat, Kalika Bali |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Word Embeddings for Code-Mixed Language ProcessingabstractWe compare three existing bilingual word embedding approaches, and a novel approach of training skip-grams on synthetic code-mixed text generated through linguistic models of code-mixing, on two tasks -sentiment analysis and POS tagging for code-mixed text.Our results show that while CVM and CCA based embeddings perform as well as the proposed embedding technique on semantic and syntactic tasks respectively, the proposed approach provides the best performance for both tasks overall.Thus, this study demonstrates that existing bilingual embedding techniques are not ideal for code-mixed text processing and there is a need for learning multilingual word embedding from the code-mixed text. Adithya Pratapa, Monojit Choudhury, Sunayana Sitaram |
EMNLP | 1 |