Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Manish Ahuja

dblp:223/0263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9857-9297ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Edge and fog computing › edge-cloud computing
edge-cloud deployment
0.612022
MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
hybrid cloud
0.612022
MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
multi-cloud
0.612022
MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022
Software testing
metamorphic testing
0.312018
Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling › resource scheduling
application placement
0.212022
MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.212022
MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112018
Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.7metamorphic testing · 0.7deep learning · 0.7multicriteria decision analysis · 0.6multi-criteria decision analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation
abstract
Deploying applications on hybrid clouds with computational artifacts distributed over public backends and private edges involve several constraints. Designing such deployment requires application architects to solve several challenges, spanning over hard regulatory policy constraints as well as business policy constraints such as enablement of privacy by on-prem processing of data to the extent the business wants, backend support of privacy enabling technologies (PET), sustainability in terms of green energy utilization, latency sensitivity of the application. In this paper, we propose to optimize hybrid cloud application architectures, while taking all those factors into consideration, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first of its kind.
Manish Ahuja, Sukhavasi Narendranath, Swapnajeet Gon Choudhury, Kaushik Amar Das, Kapil Singi, Kuntal Dey, Vikrant S. Kaulgud
ASE1
2018 Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing
abstract
We have recently witnessed tremendous success of Machine Learning (ML) in practical applications. Computer vision, speech recognition and language translation have all seen a near human level performance. We expect, in the near future, most business applications will have some form of ML. However, testing such applications is extremely challenging and would be very expensive if we follow today's methodologies. In this work, we present an articulation of the challenges in testing ML based applications. We then present our solution approach, based on the concept of Metamorphic Testing, which aims to identify implementation bugs in ML based image classifiers. We have developed metamorphic relations for an application based on Support Vector Machine and a Deep Learning based application. Empirical validation showed that our approach was able to catch 71% of the implementation bugs in the ML applications.
Anurag Dwarakanath, Manish Ahuja, Samarth Sikand, Raghotham M. Rao, R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, Neville Dubash, Sanjay Podder
ISSTA2