Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manish Ahuja
dblp:223/0263
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9857-9297ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing › edge-cloud computing
edge-cloud deployment |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
hybrid cloud |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
multi-cloud |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022 |
Software testing
metamorphic testing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling › resource scheduling
application placement |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture Recommendation · ASE 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.7metamorphic testing · 0.7deep learning · 0.7multicriteria decision analysis · 0.6multi-criteria decision analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MCDA Framework for Edge-Aware Multi-Cloud Hybrid Architecture RecommendationabstractDeploying applications on hybrid clouds with computational artifacts distributed over public backends and private edges involve several constraints. Designing such deployment requires application architects to solve several challenges, spanning over hard regulatory policy constraints as well as business policy constraints such as enablement of privacy by on-prem processing of data to the extent the business wants, backend support of privacy enabling technologies (PET), sustainability in terms of green energy utilization, latency sensitivity of the application. In this paper, we propose to optimize hybrid cloud application architectures, while taking all those factors into consideration, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first of its kind. Manish Ahuja, Sukhavasi Narendranath, Swapnajeet Gon Choudhury, Kaushik Amar Das, Kapil Singi, Kuntal Dey, Vikrant S. Kaulgud |
ASE | 1 |
| 2018 | Identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testingabstractWe have recently witnessed tremendous success of Machine Learning (ML) in practical applications. Computer vision, speech recognition and language translation have all seen a near human level performance. We expect, in the near future, most business applications will have some form of ML. However, testing such applications is extremely challenging and would be very expensive if we follow today's methodologies. In this work, we present an articulation of the challenges in testing ML based applications. We then present our solution approach, based on the concept of Metamorphic Testing, which aims to identify implementation bugs in ML based image classifiers. We have developed metamorphic relations for an application based on Support Vector Machine and a Deep Learning based application. Empirical validation showed that our approach was able to catch 71% of the implementation bugs in the ML applications. Anurag Dwarakanath, Manish Ahuja, Samarth Sikand, Raghotham M. Rao, R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, Neville Dubash, Sanjay Podder |
ISSTA | 2 |