Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mengyang Yang
dblp:223/0813
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-9236-4938ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 44% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 28% Cloud and datacenter computing · 22% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Datacenter networks · 50% Optical networks · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Datacenter networks
datacenter interconnect |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mosaic: Breaking the Optics versus Copper Trade-off with a Wide-and-Slow Architecture and MicroLEDs · SIGCOMM 2025 |
Optical networks
optical link |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mosaic: Breaking the Optics versus Copper Trade-off with a Wide-and-Slow Architecture and MicroLEDs · SIGCOMM 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Storage systems › optical storage
holographic memory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
spatial multiplexing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Storage systems › storage device technology
storage density |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Energy-efficient computing
storage energy efficiency |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
microLED · 1.7workload-driven optimization · 0.9physics modeling · 0.9machine learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mosaic: Breaking the Optics versus Copper Trade-off with a Wide-and-Slow Architecture and MicroLEDsabstractLink technologies in today's data center networks impose a fundamental trade-off between reach, power, and reliability. Copper links are power-efficient and reliable but have very limited reach (< 2 m). Optical links offer longer reach but at the expense of high power consumption and lower reliability. As network speeds increase, this trade-off becomes more pronounced, constraining future scalability. Kaoutar Benyahya, Ariel Gomez Diaz, Vassily Lyutsarev, Marianna Pantouvaki, Kai Shi 0003, Shawn Yohanes Siew, Hitesh Ballani, Thomas Burridge, Daniel Cletheroe, Thomas Karagiannis, Antony I. T. Rowstron, Mengyang Yang, Paolo Costa |
SIGCOMM | 14 |
| 2025 | Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challengesabstractHolographic Storage is an old idea that has always promised high density and fast random access, but has never been commercially competitive with Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid State Devices (SSDs). In Project HSD at Microsoft Research we asked the question: “Does holographic storage finally make sense for cloud storage?” This article describes our journey toward answering this question. We achieved 1.8× higher density than the previous state-of-the-art, using commodity components available today and leveraging machine learning to compensate for the noise and distortions introduced by commodity components. This uncovered two new challenges which are the focus of this article: achieving high end-to-end energy efficiency without sacrificing capacity, and spatial multiplexing without mechanical movement. Improving end-to-end energy efficiency requires joint optimization across low-level media parameters and higher-level system parameters that govern background maintenance operations such as read refresh and garbage collection. We developed new physics models of the media; analytic and simulation models of the media access and background media maintenance; and workload-driven optimization to find optimal parameter combinations. These techniques resulted in a 14× improvement over the previous approach for typical workloads without sacrificing capacity. We also designed the first scalable and mechanical movement free spatial multiplexing system for holographic storage. Despite these advances, we conclude that currently, holographic storage is still far from the combination of density, capacity scaling, and energy efficiency needed to compete with the incumbent technologies. We need fundamental advances in the physical media that improve energy efficiency by another 1–2 orders of magnitude without reducing data density. Further advances in optics are also required to achieve spatial multiplexing that is simultaneously scalable, low-loss, and high-density. Nathanael Cheriere, Jiaqi Chu, Grace Brennan, Pashmina Cameron, Pedro Da Costa, Jannes Gladrow, Guilherme Ilunga, Douglas J. Kelly, Joowon Lim, Giorgio Maltese, Tony Mason, Greg O'Shea, Soujanya Ponnapalli, Michael Rudow, Alan Sanders, Theano Stavrinos, Xingbo Wu, Mengyang Yang, Dushyanth Narayanan, Benn C. Thomsen, Antony I. T. Rowstron |
ACM Trans. Storage | 19 |
| 2018 | Glass: A New Media for a New Era?
Patrick Anderson 0001, Richard Black, Ausra Cerkauskaite, Andromachi Chatzieleftheriou, James Clegg, Chris Dainty, Raluca Diaconu, Rokas Drevinskas, Austin Donnelly, Alexander L. Gaunt, Andreas Georgiou, Ariel Gomez Diaz, Peter G. Kazansky, David Lara Alabazares, Sergey Legtchenko, Sebastian Nowozin, Aaron Ogus, Douglas Phillips, Antony I. T. Rowstron, Masaaki Sakakura, Ioan A. Stefanovici, Benn C. Thomsen, Hugh Williams, Mengyang Yang |
HotStorage | 25 |