Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ion Martinikorena

dblp:223/2508 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
head pose estimation
0.412020
Low Cost Gaze Estimation: Knowledge-Based Solutions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing
eye tracking
0.412020
Low Cost Gaze Estimation: Knowledge-Based Solutions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Wearable and physiological sensing › eye tracking
gaze estimation
0.412020
Low Cost Gaze Estimation: Knowledge-Based Solutions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interpolation model · 0.9geometric modeling · 0.9compound model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Low Cost Gaze Estimation: Knowledge-Based Solutions
abstract
Eye tracking technology in low resolution scenarios is not a completely solved issue to date. The possibility of using eye tracking in a mobile gadget is a challenging objective that would permit to spread this technology to non-explored fields. In this paper, a knowledge based approach is presented to solve gaze estimation in low resolution settings. The understanding of the high resolution paradigm permits to propose alternative models to solve gaze estimation. In this manner, three models are presented: a geometrical model, an interpolation model and a compound model, as solutions for gaze estimation for remote low resolution systems. Since this work considers head position essential to improve gaze accuracy, a method for head pose estimation is also proposed. The methods are validated in an optimal framework, I2Head database, which combines head and gaze data. The experimental validation of the models demonstrates their sensitivity to image processing inaccuracies, critical in the case of the geometrical model. Static and extreme movement scenarios are analyzed showing the higher robustness of compound and geometrical models in the presence of user's displacement. Accuracy values of about 3° have been obtained, increasing to values close to 5° in extreme displacement settings, results fully comparable with the state-of-the-art.
Ion Martinikorena, Andoni Larumbe-Bergera, Mikel Ariz, Sonia Porta, Rafael Cabeza, Arantxa Villanueva
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2018 Fast and robust ellipse detection algorithm for head-mounted eye tracking systems
abstract
In head-mounted eye tracking systems, the correct detection of pupil position is a key factor in estimating gaze direction. However, this is a challenging issue when the videos are recorded in real-world conditions, due to the many sources of noise and artifacts that exist in these scenarios, such as rapid changes in illumination, reflections, occlusions and an elliptical appearance of the pupil. Thus, it is an indispensable prerequisite that a pupil detection algorithm is robust in these challenging conditions. In this work, we present one pupil center detection method based on searching the maximum contribution point to the radial symmetry of the image. Additionally, two different center refinement steps were incorporated with the aim of adapting the algorithm to images with highly elliptical pupil appearances. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using a dataset consisting of 225,569 head-mounted annotated eye images from publicly available sources. The results are compared with the better algorithm found in the bibliography, with our algorithm being shown as superior.
Ion Martinikorena, Rafael Cabeza, Arantxa Villanueva, Iñaki Urtasun, Andoni Larumbe-Bergera
Mach. Vis. Appl.1