Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oscar Leong
dblp:223/4352
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1737-3981ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 58% Learning theory · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 66% Information theory · 12% Computational complexity · 12% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
flow-based prior |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem
linear inverse problem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Image and video processing
compressive sensing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Image and video processing › mathematical imaging
inverse imaging |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
empirical risk minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
generative prior |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
phase retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset bias · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tweedie's formula · 1.5trajectory matching · 1.5flow matching · 1.5dual brunn-minkowski theory · 1.5deep neural network · 1.5regularization · 0.9invertible neural network · 0.9empirical risk minimization · 0.9gradient descent · 0.3generative neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Score-based Diffusion Models for Photoacoustic Tomography Image ReconstructionabstractPhotoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a rapidly-evolving medical imaging modality that combines optical absorption contrast with ultrasound imaging depth. One challenge in PAT is image reconstruction with inadequate acoustic signals due to limited sensor coverage or due to the density of the transducer array. Such cases call for solving an ill-posed inverse reconstruction problem. In this work, we use score-based diffusion models to solve the inverse problem of reconstructing an image from limited PAT measurements. The proposed approach allows us to incorporate an expressive prior learned by a diffusion model on simulated vessel structures while still being robust to varying transducer sparsity conditions. Sreemanti Dey, Snigdha Saha, Berthy Feng, Manxiu Cui, Laure Delisle, Oscar Leong, Lihong V. Wang, Katherine L. Bouman |
ICASSP | 6 |
| 2024 | The Star Geometry of Critic-Based Regularizer LearningabstractVariational regularization is a classical technique to solve statistical inference tasks and inverse problems, with modern data-driven approaches parameterizing regularizers via deep neural networks showcasing impressive empirical performance. Recent works along these lines learn task-dependent regularizers. This is done by integrating information about the measurements and ground-truth data in an unsupervised, critic-based loss function, where the regularizer attributes low values to likely data and high values to unlikely data. However, there is little theory about the structure of regularizers learned via this process and how it relates to the two data distributions. To make progress on this challenge, we initiate a study of optimizing critic-based loss functions to learn regularizers over a particular family of regularizers: gauges (or Minkowski functionals) of star-shaped bodies. This family contains regularizers that are commonly employed in practice and shares properties with regularizers parameterized by deep neural networks. We specifically investigate critic-based losses derived from variational representations of statistical distances between probability measures. By leveraging tools from star geometry and dual Brunn-Minkowski theory, we illustrate how these losses can be interpreted as dual mixed volumes that depend on the data distribution. This allows us to derive exact expressions for the optimal regularizer in certain cases. Finally, we identify which neural network architectures give rise to such star body gauges and when do such regularizers have favorable properties for optimization. More broadly, this work highlights how the tools of star geometry can aid in understanding the geometry of unsupervised regularizer learning. Oscar Leong, Eliza O'Reilly, Yong Sheng Soh |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory MatchingabstractGenerative models based on flow matching have attracted significant attention for their simplicity and superior performance in high-resolution image synthesis. By leveraging the instantaneous change-of-variables formula, one can directly compute image likelihoods from a learned flow, making them enticing candidates as priors for downstream tasks such as inverse problems. In particular, a natural approach would be to incorporate such image probabilities in a maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation problem. A major obstacle, however, lies in the slow computation of the log-likelihood, as it requires backpropagating through an ODE solver, which can be prohibitively slow for high-dimensional problems. In this work, we propose an iterative algorithm to approximate the MAP estimator efficiently to solve a variety of linear inverse problems. Our algorithm is mathematically justified by the observation that the MAP objective can be approximated by a sum of $N$ ``local MAP'' objectives, where $N$ is the number of function evaluations. By leveraging Tweedie's formula, we show that we can perform gradient steps to sequentially optimize these objectives. We validate our approach for various linear inverse problems, such as super-resolution, deblurring, inpainting, and compressed sensing, and demonstrate that we can outperform other methods based on flow matching. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/YasminZhang/ICTM}. Yasi Zhang, Peiyu Yu, Yaxuan Zhu, Yingshan Chang, Feng Gao 0013, Ying Nian Wu, Oscar Leong |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | Alternating Phase Langevin Sampling with Implicit Denoiser Priors for Phase RetrievalabstractPhase retrieval is the nonlinear inverse problem of recovering a true signal from its Fourier magnitude measurements. It arises in many applications such as astronomical imaging, X-Ray crystallography, microscopy, and more. The problem is highly ill-posed due to the phase-induced ambiguities and the large number of possible images that can fit to the given measurements. Thus, there’s a rich history of enforcing structural priors to improve solutions including sparsity priors and deep-learning-based generative models. However, such priors are often limited in their representational capacity or generalizability to slightly different distributions. Recent advancements in using denoisers as regularizers for non-convex optimization algorithms have shown promising performance and generalization. We present a way of leveraging the prior implicitly learned by a denoiser to solve phase retrieval problems by incorporating it in a classical alternating minimization framework. Compared to performant denoising-based algorithms for phase retrieval, we showcase competitive performance with Fourier measurements on in-distribution images and notable improvement on out-of-distribution images. Rohun Agrawal, Oscar Leong |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2023 | Image Reconstruction without Explicit PriorsabstractWe consider solving ill-posed imaging inverse problems without access to an explicit image prior or ground-truth examples. An overarching challenge in inverse problems is that there are many undesired images that fit to the observed measurements, thus requiring image priors to constrain the space of possible solutions to more plausible reconstructions. However, in many applications it is difficult or potentially impossible to obtain ground-truth images to learn an image prior. Thus, inaccurate priors are often used, which inevitably result in biased solutions. Rather than solving an inverse problem using priors that encode the explicit structure of any one image, we propose to solve a set of inverse problems jointly by incorporating prior constraints on the collective structure of the underlying images. The key assumption of our work is that the ground-truth images we aim to reconstruct share common, low-dimensional structure. We show that such a set of inverse problems can be solved simultaneously by learning a shared image generator with a low-dimensional latent space. The parameters of the generator and latent embedding are learned by maximizing a proxy for the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO). Once learned, the generator and latent embeddings can be combined to provide reconstructions for each inverse problem. The framework we propose can handle general forward model corruptions, and we show that measurements derived from only a few ground-truth images (O(10)) are sufficient for image reconstruction without explicit priors. Angela F. Gao, Oscar Leong, He Sun 0010, Katherine L. Bouman |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2020 | Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biasabstractTrained generative models have shown remarkable performance as priors for inverse problems in imaging – for example, Generative Adversarial Network priors permit recovery of test images from 5-10x fewer measurements than sparsity priors. Unfortunately, these models may be unable to represent any particular image because of architectural choices, mode collapse, and bias in the training dataset. In this paper, we demonstrate that invertible neural networks, which have zero representation error by design, can be effective natural signal priors at inverse problems such as denoising, compressive sensing, and inpainting. Given a trained generative model, we study the empirical risk formulation of the desired inverse problem under a regularization that promotes high likelihood images, either directly by penalization or algorithmically by initialization. For compressive sensing, invertible priors can yield higher accuracy than sparsity priors across almost all undersampling ratios, and due to their lack of representation error, invertible priors can yield better reconstructions than GAN priors for images that have rare features of variation within the biased training set, including out-of-distribution natural images. We additionally compare performance for compressive sensing to unlearned methods, such as the deep decoder, and we establish theoretical bounds on expected recovery error in the case of a linear invertible model. Muhammad Asim 0005, Max Daniels, Oscar Leong, Ali Ahmed 0004, Paul Hand |
ICML | 3 |
| 2018 | Phase Retrieval Under a Generative PriorabstractWe introduce a novel deep-learning inspired formulation of the \textit{phase retrieval problem}, which asks to recover a signal $y_0 \in \R^n$ from $m$ quadratic observations, under structural assumptions on the underlying signal. As is common in many imaging problems, previous methodologies have considered natural signals as being sparse with respect to a known basis, resulting in the decision to enforce a generic sparsity prior. However, these methods for phase retrieval have encountered possibly fundamental limitations, as no computationally efficient algorithm for sparse phase retrieval has been proven to succeed with fewer than $O(k^2\log n)$ generic measurements, which is larger than the theoretical optimum of $O(k \log n)$. In this paper, we sidestep this issue by considering a prior that a natural signal is in the range of a generative neural network $G : \R^k \rightarrow \R^n$. We introduce an empirical risk formulation that has favorable global geometry for gradient methods, as soon as $m = O(k)$, under the model of a multilayer fully-connected neural network with random weights. Specifically, we show that there exists a descent direction outside of a small neighborhood around the true $k$-dimensional latent code and a negative multiple thereof. This formulation for structured phase retrieval thus benefits from two effects: generative priors can more tightly represent natural signals than sparsity priors, and this empirical risk formulation can exploit those generative priors at an information theoretically optimal sample complexity, unlike for a sparsity prior. We corroborate these results with experiments showing that exploiting generative models in phase retrieval tasks outperforms both sparse and general phase retrieval methods. Paul Hand, Oscar Leong, Vladislav Voroninski |
NeurIPS | 2 |