Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Striner

dblp:223/4510 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › biomedical text mining
clinical text analysis
0.712023
MDACE: MIMIC Documents Annotated with Code Evidence · ACL (1) 2023
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical text annotation
0.712023
MDACE: MIMIC Documents Annotated with Code Evidence · ACL (1) 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

annotation · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MDACE: MIMIC Documents Annotated with Code Evidence
abstract
Hua Cheng, Rana Jafari, April Russell, Russell Klopfer, Edmond Lu, Benjamin Striner, Matthew Gormley. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Rana Jafari, April Russell, Russell Klopfer, Edmond Lu, Benjamin Striner, Matthew R. Gormley
ACL (1)6
2021 Using Reinforcement Learning With Partial Vehicle Detection for Intelligent Traffic Signal Control
abstract
Intelligent Traffic Signal Control (ITSC) systems have attracted the attention of researchers and the general public alike as a means of alleviating traffic congestion. Recently, the vehicular wireless technologies have enabled a cost-efficient way to achieve ITSC by detecting vehicles using Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) wireless communications. Traditional ITSC algorithms, in most cases, assume that every vehicle is detected, such as by a camera or a loop detector, but a V2I implementation would detect only those vehicles equipped with wireless communications capability. We examine a family of transportation systems, which we will refer to as `Partially Detected Intelligent Transportation Systems'. An algorithm that can perform well under a small detection rate is highly desirable due to gradual increasing penetration rates of the underlying technologies such as Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) technology. Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach in Artificial Intelligence (AI) could provide indispensable tools for such problems where only a small portion of vehicles are detected by the ITSC system. In this paper, we report a new RL algorithm for Partially Detected Intelligent Traffic Signal Control (PD-ITSC) systems. The performance of this system is studied under different car flows, detection rates, and types of the road network. Our system is able to efficiently reduce the average waiting time of vehicles at an intersection, even with a low detection rate, thus reducing the travel time of vehicles.
Rusheng Zhang, Akihiro Ishikawa, Benjamin Striner, Ozan K. Tonguz
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.4
2019 Partially Detected Intelligent Traffic Signal Control: Environmental Adaptation
abstract
Partially Detected Intelligent Traffic Signal Control(PD-ITSC) systems that can optimize traffic signals based on limited detected information could be a cost-efficient solution for mitigating traffic congestion in the future. In this paper, we focus on a particular problem in PD-ITSC - adaptation to changing environments. To this end, we investigate different reinforcement learning algorithms, including Q-Learning, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C), and Actor-Criticwith Kronecker-Factored Trust-Region (ACKTR). Our findings suggest that RL algorithms can find optimal strategies under partial vehicle detection; however, policy-based algorithms can adapt to changing environments more efficiently than value-based algorithms. We use these findings to draw conclusions about the value of different models for PD-ITSC systems.
Rusheng Zhang, Romain Leteurtre, Benjamin Striner, Ammar S. Alanazi, Abdullah Alghafis, Ozan K. Tonguz
ICMLA3