Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pryanshu Arora
dblp:223/4576
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness evaluation
fairness testing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018 |
Software testing › test generation
directed test generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic search · 0.7metamorphic testing · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Road context-aware intrusion detection system for autonomous cars: work-in-progressabstractThe necessity of intrusion detection system (IDS) is concrete for automobiles, and is particularly critical for unmanned, autonomous ones. However, limited work has been done to detect intrusions in an autonomous car while existing IDSs have limitations against strong adversaries. We hence consider the very nature of autonomous car and propose to utilize the road context to build a Road context-aware IDS (RAIDS). We hypothesize that given a computer-controlled car, the pattern and data of frames transmitted on the in-vehicle communication network should be relatively regular and obtainable when the car is cruising through continuous road contexts. Accordingly we design RAIDS and implement a preliminary prototype that discerns and identifies anomalous frames fabricated or suspended by adversaries. Evaluation results show that RAIDS effectively detects intrusions that are beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art IDS. Tanya Srivastava, Pryanshu Arora, Chundong Wang 0001, Sudipta Chattopadhyay 0001 |
EMSOFT | 2 |
| 2018 | Automated directed fairness testingabstractFairness is a critical trait in decision making. As machine-learning models are increasingly being used in sensitive application domains (e.g. education and employment) for decision making, it is crucial that the decisions computed by such models are free of unintended bias. But how can we automatically validate the fairness of arbitrary machine-learning models? For a given machine-learning model and a set of sensitive input parameters, our Aeqitas approach automatically discovers discriminatory inputs that highlight fairness violation. At the core of Aeqitas are three novel strategies to employ probabilistic search over the input space with the objective of uncovering fairness violation. Our Aeqitas approach leverages inherent robustness property in common machine-learning models to design and implement scalable test generation methodologies. An appealing feature of our generated test inputs is that they can be systematically added to the training set of the underlying model and improve its fairness. To this end, we design a fully automated module that guarantees to improve the fairness of the model. We implemented Aeqitas and we have evaluated it on six stateof- the-art classifiers. Our subjects also include a classifier that was designed with fairness in mind. We show that Aeqitas effectively generates inputs to uncover fairness violation in all the subject classifiers and systematically improves the fairness of respective models using the generated test inputs. In our evaluation, Aeqitas generates up to 70% discriminatory inputs (w.r.t. the total number of inputs generated) and leverages these inputs to improve the fairness up to 94%. Sakshi Udeshi, Pryanshu Arora, Sudipta Chattopadhyay 0001 |
ASE | 2 |