Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pryanshu Arora

dblp:223/4576 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.312018
Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness evaluation
fairness testing
0.312018
Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018
Software testing › test generation
directed test generation
0.312018
Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018
Software testing
test generation
0.312018
Automated directed fairness testing · ASE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic search · 0.7metamorphic testing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Road context-aware intrusion detection system for autonomous cars: work-in-progress
abstract
The necessity of intrusion detection system (IDS) is concrete for automobiles, and is particularly critical for unmanned, autonomous ones. However, limited work has been done to detect intrusions in an autonomous car while existing IDSs have limitations against strong adversaries. We hence consider the very nature of autonomous car and propose to utilize the road context to build a Road context-aware IDS (RAIDS). We hypothesize that given a computer-controlled car, the pattern and data of frames transmitted on the in-vehicle communication network should be relatively regular and obtainable when the car is cruising through continuous road contexts. Accordingly we design RAIDS and implement a preliminary prototype that discerns and identifies anomalous frames fabricated or suspended by adversaries. Evaluation results show that RAIDS effectively detects intrusions that are beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art IDS.
Tanya Srivastava, Pryanshu Arora, Chundong Wang 0001, Sudipta Chattopadhyay 0001
EMSOFT2
2018 Automated directed fairness testing
abstract
Fairness is a critical trait in decision making. As machine-learning models are increasingly being used in sensitive application domains (e.g. education and employment) for decision making, it is crucial that the decisions computed by such models are free of unintended bias. But how can we automatically validate the fairness of arbitrary machine-learning models? For a given machine-learning model and a set of sensitive input parameters, our Aeqitas approach automatically discovers discriminatory inputs that highlight fairness violation. At the core of Aeqitas are three novel strategies to employ probabilistic search over the input space with the objective of uncovering fairness violation. Our Aeqitas approach leverages inherent robustness property in common machine-learning models to design and implement scalable test generation methodologies. An appealing feature of our generated test inputs is that they can be systematically added to the training set of the underlying model and improve its fairness. To this end, we design a fully automated module that guarantees to improve the fairness of the model. We implemented Aeqitas and we have evaluated it on six stateof- the-art classifiers. Our subjects also include a classifier that was designed with fairness in mind. We show that Aeqitas effectively generates inputs to uncover fairness violation in all the subject classifiers and systematically improves the fairness of respective models using the generated test inputs. In our evaluation, Aeqitas generates up to 70% discriminatory inputs (w.r.t. the total number of inputs generated) and leverages these inputs to improve the fairness up to 94%.
Sakshi Udeshi, Pryanshu Arora, Sudipta Chattopadhyay 0001
ASE2