Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haseeb Shah
dblp:223/4749
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4493-9488ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | q-exponential family for policy optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | q-exponential family for policy optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy learning
policy parameterization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | q-exponential family for policy optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
real-time recurrent learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scalable Real-Time Recurrent Learning Using Columnar-Constructive Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Open-World Extension to Knowledge Graph Completion Models · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An Open-World Extension to Knowledge Graph Completion Models · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | q-exponential family for policy optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scalable Real-Time Recurrent Learning Using Columnar-Constructive Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tsallis advantage weighted actor-critic · 0.9student's t-distribution · 0.9q-exponential family · 0.9columnar-constructive networks · 0.7backpropagation through time · 0.7word embeddings · 0.4transe · 0.4embedding transformation · 0.4distmult · 0.4complex · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | q-exponential family for policy optimizationabstractPolicy optimization methods benefit from a simple and tractable policy parametrization, usually the Gaussian for continuous action spaces. In this paper, we consider a broader policy family that remains tractable: the $q$-exponential family.
This family of policies is flexible, allowing the specification of both heavy-tailed policies ($q>1$) and light-tailed policies ($q<1$). This paper examines the interplay between $q$-exponential policies for several actor-critic algorithms conducted on both online and offline problems. We find that heavy-tailed policies are more effective in general and can consistently improve on Gaussian.
In particular, we find the Student's t-distribution to be more stable than the Gaussian across settings and that a heavy-tailed $q$-Gaussian for Tsallis Advantage Weighted Actor-Critic consistently performs well in offline benchmark problems.
In summary, we find that the Student's t policy a strong candidate for drop-in replacement to the Gaussian.
Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/lingweizhu/qexp}. Lingwei Zhu, Haseeb Shah, Han Wang 0066, Yukie Nagai, Martha White |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | GVFs in the real world: making predictions online for water treatmentabstractAbstract In this paper we investigate the use of reinforcement-learning based prediction approaches for a real drinking-water treatment plant. Developing such a prediction system is a critical step on the path to optimizing and automating water treatment. Before that, there are many questions to answer about the predictability of the data, suitable neural network architectures, how to overcome partial observability and more. We first describe this dataset, and highlight challenges with seasonality, nonstationarity, partial observability, and heterogeneity across sensors and operation modes of the plant. We then describe General Value Function (GVF) predictions—discounted cumulative sums of observations–and highlight why they might be preferable to classical n-step predictions common in time series prediction. We discuss how to use offline data to appropriately pre-train our temporal difference learning (TD) agents that learn these GVF predictions, including how to select hyperparameters for online fine-tuning in deployment. We find that the TD-prediction agent obtains an overall lower normalized mean-squared error than the n-step prediction agent. Finally, we show the importance of learning in deployment, by comparing a TD agent trained purely offline with no online updating to a TD agent that learns online. This final result is one of the first to motivate the importance of adapting predictions in real-time, for non-stationary high-volume systems in the real world. Muhammad Kamran Janjua, Haseeb Shah, Martha White, Erfan Miahi, Marlos C. Machado, Adam White 0001 |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2023 | Scalable Real-Time Recurrent Learning Using Columnar-Constructive NetworksabstractConstructing states from sequences of observations is an important component of reinforcement learning agents. One solution for state construction is to use recurrent neural networks. Back-propagation through time (BPTT), and real-time recurrent learning (RTRL) are two popular gradient-based methods for recurrent learning. BPTT requires complete trajectories of observations before it can compute the gradients and is unsuitable for online updates. RTRL can do online updates but scales poorly to large networks. In this paper, we propose two constraints that make RTRL scalable. We show that by either decomposing the network into independent modules or learning the network in stages, we can make RTRL scale linearly with the number of parameters. Unlike prior scalable gradient estimation algorithms, such as UORO and Truncated-BPTT, our algorithms do not add noise or bias to the gradient estimate. Instead, they trade off the functional capacity of the network for computationally efficient learning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach over Truncated-BPTT on a prediction benchmark inspired by animal learning and by doing policy evaluation of pre-trained policies for Atari 2600 games. Khurram Javed, Haseeb Shah, Richard S. Sutton, Martha White |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | An Open-World Extension to Knowledge Graph Completion ModelsabstractWe present a novel extension to embedding-based knowledge graph completion models which enables them to perform open-world link prediction, i.e. to predict facts for entities unseen in training based on their textual description. Our model combines a regular link prediction model learned from a knowledge graph with word embeddings learned from a textual corpus. After training both independently, we learn a transformation to map the embeddings of an entity’s name and description to the graph-based embedding space.In experiments on several datasets including FB20k, DBPedia50k and our new dataset FB15k-237-OWE, we demonstrate competitive results. Particularly, our approach exploits the full knowledge graph structure even when textual descriptions are scarce, does not require a joint training on graph and text, and can be applied to any embedding-based link prediction model, such as TransE, ComplEx and DistMult. Haseeb Shah, Johannes Villmow, Adrian Ulges, Ulrich Schwanecke, Faisal Shafait |
AAAI | 1 |