EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chandramouli Shama Sastry
dblp:223/6317
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Vision and language · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024 Symbolic Music Generation with Non-Differentiable Rule Guided Diffusion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024 Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples with Gram Matrices · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
neural network training acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competition · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
compositionality |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion-based data augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
guided diffusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symbolic Music Generation with Non-Differentiable Rule Guided Diffusion · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Audio and music processing › music generation
symbolic music generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Symbolic Music Generation with Non-Differentiable Rule Guided Diffusion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples with Gram Matrices · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
preconditioning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competition · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust Classifiers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic control guidance · 1.5latent diffusion · 1.5schedule-free adamw · 0.9hyperparameter tuning · 0.9distributed shampoo · 0.9reverse diffusion · 0.8forward diffusion · 0.8deepaugment · 0.8benchmark dataset construction · 0.8augmix · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerating neural network training: An analysis of the AlgoPerf competitionabstractThe goal of the AlgoPerf: Training Algorithms competition is to evaluate practical speed-ups in neural network training achieved solely by improving the underlying training algorithms. In the external tuning ruleset, submissions must provide workload-agnostic hyperparameter search spaces, while in the self-tuning ruleset they must be completely hyperparameter-free. In both rulesets, submissions are compared on time-to-result across multiple deep learning workloads, training on fixed hardware. This paper presents the inaugural AlgoPerf competition's results, which drew 18 diverse submissions from 10 teams. Our investigation reveals several key findings: (1) The winning submission in the external tuning ruleset, using Distributed Shampoo, demonstrates the effectiveness of non-diagonal preconditioning over popular methods like Adam, even when compared on wall-clock runtime. (2) The winning submission in the self-tuning ruleset, based on the Schedule Free AdamW algorithm, demonstrates a new level of effectiveness for completely hyperparameter-free training algorithms. (3) The top-scoring submissions were surprisingly robust to workload changes. We also discuss the engineering challenges encountered in ensuring a fair comparison between different training algorithms. These results highlight both the significant progress so far, and the considerable room for further improvements. Priya Kasimbeg, Frank Schneider 0001, Runa Eschenhagen, Juhan Bae, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Mark Saroufim, Boyuan Feng, Less Wright, Edward Z. Yang, Zachary Nado, Sourabh Medapati, Philipp Hennig, Michael G. Rabbat, George E. Dahl |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2025 | Test-Time Training for Speech-based Depression Detection
Sri Harsha Dumpala, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Rudolf Uher, Sageev Oore |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2024 | Symbolic Music Generation with Non-Differentiable Rule Guided DiffusionabstractWe study the problem of symbolic music generation (e.g., generating piano rolls), with a technical focus on non-differentiable rule guidance. Musical rules are often expressed in symbolic form on note characteristics, such as note density or chord progression, many of which are non-differentiable which pose a challenge when using them for guided diffusion. We propose Stochastic Control Guidance (SCG), a novel guidance method that only requires forward evaluation of rule functions that can work with pre-trained diffusion models in a plug-and-play way, thus achieving training-free guidance for non-differentiable rules for the first time. Additionally, we introduce a latent diffusion architecture for symbolic music generation with high time resolution, which can be composed with SCG in a plug-and-play fashion. Compared to standard strong baselines in symbolic music generation, this framework demonstrates marked advancements in music quality and rule-based controllability, outperforming current state-of-the-art generators in a variety of settings. For detailed demonstrations, code and model checkpoints, please visit our [project website](https://scg-rule-guided-music.github.io/). Yujia Huang, Adishree Ghatare, Yuanzhe Liu 0001, Ziniu Hu, Qinsheng Zhang, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Siddharth Gururani, Sageev Oore, Yisong Yue |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | XANE: eXplainable Acoustic Neural Embeddings
Sri Harsha Dumpala, Dushyant Sharma, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Stanislav Yu. Kruchinin, James Fosburgh, Patrick A. Naylor |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2024 | SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical AlterationsabstractDespite their remarkable successes, state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), including vision-and-language models (VLMs) and unimodal language models (ULMs), fail to understand precise semantics. For example, semantically equivalent sentences expressed using different lexical compositions elicit diverging representations. The degree of this divergence and its impact on encoded semantics is not very well understood. In this paper, we introduce the SUGARCREPE++ dataset to analyze the sensitivity of VLMs and ULMs to lexical and semantic alterations. Each sample in SUGARCREPE++ dataset consists of an image and a corresponding triplet of captions: a pair of semantically equivalent but lexically different positive captions and one hard negative caption. This poses a 3-way semantic (in)equivalence problem to the language models. We comprehensively evaluate VLMs and ULMs that differ in architecture, pre-training objectives and datasets to benchmark the performance of SUGARCREPE++ dataset. Experimental results highlight the difficulties of VLMs in distinguishing between lexical and semantic variations, particularly to object attributes and spatial relations. Although VLMs with larger pre-training datasets, model sizes, and multiple pre-training objectives achieve better performance on SUGARCREPE++, there is a significant opportunity for improvement. We demonstrate that models excelling on compositionality datasets may not perform equally well on SUGARCREPE++. This indicates that compositionality alone might not be sufficient to fully understand semantic and lexical alterations. Given the importance of the property that the SUGARCREPE++ dataset targets, it serves as a new challenge to the vision-and-language community. Data and code is available at https://github.com/Sri-Harsha/scpp. Sri Harsha Dumpala, Aman Jaiswal, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Evangelos E. Milios, Sageev Oore, Hassan Sajjad 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | DiffAug: A Diffuse-and-Denoise Augmentation for Training Robust ClassifiersabstractWe introduce DiffAug, a simple and efficient diffusion-based augmentation technique to train image classifiers for the crucial yet challenging goal of improved classifier robustness. Applying DiffAug to a given example consists of one forward-diffusion step followed by one reverse-diffusion step. Using both ResNet-50 and Vision Transformer architectures, we comprehensively evaluate classifiers trained with DiffAug and demonstrate the surprising effectiveness of single-step reverse diffusion in improving robustness to covariate shifts, certified adversarial accuracy and out of distribution detection. When we combine DiffAug with other augmentations such as AugMix and DeepAugment we demonstrate further improved robustness. Finally, building on this approach, we also improve classifier-guided diffusion wherein we observe improvements in: (i) classifier-generalization, (ii) gradient quality (i.e., improved perceptual alignment) and (iii) image generation performance. We thus introduce a computationally efficient technique for training with improved robustness that does not require any additional data, and effectively complements existing augmentation approaches. Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Sri Harsha Dumpala, Sageev Oore |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | On Combining Global and Localized Self-Supervised Models of Speech
Sri Harsha Dumpala, Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Rudolf Uher, Sageev Oore |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2021 | Controlling BigGAN Image Generation with a Segmentation Network
Aman Jaiswal, Harpreet Singh Sodhi, Mohamed Muzamil H, Rajveen Singh Chandhok, Sageev Oore, Chandramouli Shama Sastry |
DS | 6 |
| 2020 | Detecting Out-of-Distribution Examples with Gram MatricesabstractWhen presented with Out-of-Distribution (OOD) examples, deep neural networks yield confident, incorrect predictions; detecting OOD examples is challenging, and the potential risks are high. In this paper, we propose to detect OOD examples by identifying inconsistencies between activity patterns and predicted class. We find that characterizing activity patterns by Gram matrices and identifying anomalies in Gram matrix values can yield high OOD detection rates. We identify anomalies in the Gram matrices by simply comparing each value with its respective range observed over the training data. Unlike many approaches, this can be used with any pre-trained softmax classifier and neither requires access to OOD data for fine-tuning hyperparameters, nor does it require OOD access for inferring parameters. We empirically demonstrate applicability across a variety of architectures and vision datasets and, for the important and surprisingly hard task of detecting far out-of-distribution examples, it generally performs better than or equal to state-of-the-art OOD detection methods (including those that do assume access to OOD examples). Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Sageev Oore |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Active neural learners for text with dual supervision
Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Evangelos E. Milios |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 1 |
| 2017 | Visualizing Textbook Concepts: Beyond Word Co-occurrences
Chandramouli Shama Sastry, Darshan Siddesh Jagaluru, Kavi Mahesh |
CICLing (1) | 1 |